Keyes Responsed to opposition Q.O.
Posted on | January 9, 2010 | 4 Comments
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
4 Responses to “Keyes Responsed to opposition Q.O.”
-
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — Indiana Trial of Obama, 2nd Copy
Evidence on Barack Obama
Obama File with Exhibits
Affidavit of Paul Irey
Obama file Exhibits 1 - 7
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 1
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 2
Obama file Exhibits 9-13
Obama file Exhibits 14-21
Request for Docs under FOIA and Emergency Motion for Reconsideration
Exhibits sent to Inspector Generals and CongressPetition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
URGENT! PLEASE SIGN PETITION TO CONGRESS
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Subscribe today to stay in touch with our progress. Send this channel out to your email lists. Thank you for your support. CHANNEL (Google Plus) SUBSCRIBE TO YOUTUBE

Official Facebook
Recent Posts
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687

--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------

Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------

--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
Pages
- #409755 (no title)
- …Defendant Obama defaulted in Grinols et al v Obama et al
- …Grinols Subpoenas
- ..Grinols Order, Summons, TRO, Complaint
- .Affidavit of Mike Zullo
- 1. Judd v Obama
- 2. Farrar v Obama
- 3. Taitz v Sebelius
- 4. Taitz v Indiana, IN Judge Orders Trial
- 5. Taitz v Astrue
- 6. Mississippi Filed Complaint Update
- 7. Taitz Walters v Sec of State Kansas
- Videos
- Video: Orly before NH Election Committee










January 9th, 2010 @ 9:36 pm
The pressure and recognition mount. Below are two paragraphs from a report today on WND.COM. Kudos:
From WND.COM
(https://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=121393)
BORN IN THE USA?
Obama eligibility attorney charges case rife with fraud
Asks court for ‘evidentiary hearing for possible criminal prosecution’
Orly Taitz, who has, among other cases, one pending at the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on behalf of a member of the military wondering whether orders from Obama as commander-in-chief are valid, said the possibility of fraud is one of several concerns in the case.
“There is such a high probability of criminal acts of identity theft and Social Security fraud committed by the respondent that the undersigned requests this honorable court to use its inherent powers to order Sua Sponte an evidentiary hearing on this particular issue for possible criminal prosecution,” she wrote in her latest arguments that also request the case be moved to Washington, D.C.
Note: SUA SPONTE: from
https://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=2032
SUA SPONTE: (sooh-uh spahn-tay) adj. Latin for “of one’s own will,” meaning on one’s own volition, usually referring to a judge’s order made without a request by any party to the case. These include an order transferring a case to another judge due to a conflict of interest or the judge’s determination that his/her court does not have jurisdiction over the case.
January 10th, 2010 @ 2:30 am
Article II Section 8 requirement number 9 states offenses against The Law of Nations are to be defined and Punished. Now that it is established that The Law of Nations in turn establishes that a natural born citizen is one born in the country of parentS who are it’s citizenS, Orly does have some basis for her claims.
January 10th, 2010 @ 9:14 am
James,
Where in the US CONSTITUTION is that?
I checked Article II Sec. 8( there is no section 8 Of Article II in US Constitution that I can find)Article II has only 4 sections.
I’m not trying to be argumentitive,Ijust need clearification on where you have found this, better to eductae myself (our selves) with where it is written.
Is it the Law of Nations? Which boof( chapter, page etc…as i can’t locate it, guess I’m missing something.
Thanks for the assist.
Ed
January 10th, 2010 @ 4:40 pm
Article 1, section 8 mentions the Law of Nations as reference