Pressure on Obama is building. Congressman Nathan Deal and others to demand from Obama proof of eligibility
Posted on | November 5, 2009 | 15 Comments
Thursday, November 5, 2009
Congressmen ask for Obama’s birth certificate – U.S. Rep. Nathan Deal and “several colleagues” to ask Obama to release birth certificate
The occasion was an online chat the congressman had with supporters this morning. And the question came from Tom Crawford of Capitol Impact.
Do you believe that Barack Obama is a native-born American citizen who is eligible to serve as president? I am asking because your comments on this issue have been a little ambiguous. I would appreciate your clearing this up.
At 9:17 a.m., Deal tapped out this:
I am joining several of my colleagues in the House in writing a letter to the President asking that he release a copy of his birth certificate so we can have an answer to this question.
Comments
15 Responses to “Pressure on Obama is building. Congressman Nathan Deal and others to demand from Obama proof of eligibility”
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
November 5th, 2009 @ 6:21 pm
Do you believe that Barack Obama is a native-born American citizen who is eligible to serve as president? I am asking because your comments on this issue have been a little ambiguous. I would appreciate your clearing this up.
THE PHRASE IS “NATURAL BORN” Not native born.
November 5th, 2009 @ 6:47 pm
Can’t these Congressmen ever get this straight?
They’re falling into the same Obama-laid “red-herring” trap.
The issue is NOT “native born” or “native born citizen”, IT IS “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” — A TOTALLY DIFFERENT THING; thus Obama may have been born in Hawaii (“native born”) but he CANNOT BE A “natural born citizen” under Article 2 of the Constitution because his dad was Kenyan/British citizen on Baby O’s birth.
November 5th, 2009 @ 6:50 pm
Does this commentator not know the difference between native born and natural born. Naturalized means became a citizen through immigration. Native is an American Indian. Does Obama now claim he is an American Indian? Just curious as to what Indian Nation he is a member.
November 5th, 2009 @ 7:19 pm
i only pray this is not simply more lip service.. since i dont know this person i can only hope his motives for saying this is on the up and up
will
November 5th, 2009 @ 7:40 pm
ihv>> birth cert would be nice but i wanna see all his records as well.. passports, college records finiancial statement as to how his college was paid…
but at least that would be a start
will
November 5th, 2009 @ 8:03 pm
“Do you believe that Barack Obama is a native-born American citizen who is eligible to serve as president?”
Uhhh, READ the Constitution! NOWHERE does it require the POTUS to be a “NATIVE-born” citizen.
NATURAL born citizen!!! Born to TWO U.S. citizen parents on U.S. soil. BLOOD & DIRT – why is that so hard to get through the thick heads???
Sounds like a bone is being tossed if you ask me.
November 5th, 2009 @ 9:09 pm
I cannot understand why I assume educated people cannot know the difference between native born citizen and natural born citizen. I only have a high school education and I know the difference.. I looked it up. It wasn’t so hard. There is no way BO can be a natural born citizen according to the oonstitution.
November 5th, 2009 @ 9:30 pm
Questioners better get up to speed on this, because if it turns out somehow that Obama WAS born in Hawaii or the US, the fact that he is STILL not eligible (because not a natural-born citizen) will be lost amid the general gloating on the other side.
People should mention more the fact that it is ALREADY proven that he is not eligible. His not being born in the US would merely be icing on the cake.
November 6th, 2009 @ 12:15 am
I agree with all of you. What in ‘Natural Born’ citizen do these people not understand? There ought to be a class on U.S. Constitution 101 which all these Senators and Congressmen have to attend before they even take office.
Let me tell you what happened to me recently. Around the first of October, I wrote an article in Letters to the Editor to be published in my local newspaper about the meaning of ‘natural born’ citizen and how come BHO doesn’t qualify to be POTUS. I waited for a couple of weeks to see if it was going to ever be published, but you can guess the answer. I sent a request to the editor asking him why my article didn’t get published and here is his reply to me. “You’re attempting to make allegations of fact that have been disapproven in several courts. We’re not going to keep doing that repeatedly.” Well, that infuriated me to no end, so I sent him back my reply. I asked him first, “In what courts are you referring to?” I went on to give him all the facts about what’s been going on with all the lawsuits and the recent Judge Carter’s ruling. I explained that BHO has never gone to trial yet for discovery of his vital records to prove if he’s a ligitmate POTUS. “All have been dismissed for lack of standing,” I told him. I asked him why doesn’t he become a true journalist and investigate BHO? Haven’t had a reply back from him yet and don’t expect one.
I hope someone is able to set Congressman Deal straight and that we not only want BHO’s LONG-FORM birth certificate but all his vital records.
Thank you again our Lady Liberty for your determination on seeing this thru until the very end. You aren’t going to let him get away with highjacking the United States of America.
November 6th, 2009 @ 1:44 am
From the Canadian Free Press, this site might explain the inexplicable. There are dark forces suppressing even Fox News today…
https://pinroot.wordpress.com/2009/10/24/who-is-behind-quashing-the-birth-certificate-issue/
November 6th, 2009 @ 1:48 am
Here’s some tantalizing excerpts:
NOW WE KNOW WHY
In an explosive interview by Dr. Laurie Roth on her syndicated West Coast radio show on August 7th, Douglas Hagmann—a respected journalist, director of the Northeast Intelligence Network and longtime private investigator, and Judi McLeod, a prolific journalist and the managing editor of Canada Free Press—the reason for the media blackout about the birth-certificate issue was nothing less than organized Mafia-like dire threats to members of the media issued not only from the heads of major TV and radio stations but also from Federal Communication Commission officials!
According to Hagmann and McLeod, who conducted a nine-month investigation and documented their findings scrupulously, after Obama was elected but before he was inaugurated:
A major TV talk-show host reported that he was ordered not to raise the birth certificate issue or risk losing his job.
FCC officials threatened to yank broadcasting licenses, break up conglomerates, and make the enactment of the Fairness Doctrine “look mild” in comparison to other consequences.
In at least one corporate TV headquarters, memos were circulated to all on-air employees not to mention the birth certificate issue, as well as other specific subjects like Obama’s Illinois lawyer’s license, his college records, etc., under both implied and explicit threats.
During the interview, Hagmann and McLeod—who never mentioned a particular network by name—alluded to e-mails and other evidence in their possession, copies of which, they said, were secreted in several locations. But they did tantalize listeners with descriptions of meeting with “sources” outside of St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York City, a high-placed contact looking nervously over his shoulder, references to directives and warnings given by “those at the top,” and the undisguised threat of one executive to his underlings: “This is serious, and so will the consequences be if anyone chooses not to be a team player with this.”
November 6th, 2009 @ 1:57 am
https://pinroot.wordpress.com/2009/10/24/who-is-behind-quashing-the-birth-certificate-issue/
This website from the Canadian Free Press might explain the inexplicable. Here’s an excerpt…
NOW WE KNOW WHY
“In an explosive interview by Dr. Laurie Roth on her syndicated West Coast radio show on August 7th, Douglas Hagmann—a respected journalist, director of the Northeast Intelligence Network and longtime private investigator, and Judi McLeod, a prolific journalist and the managing editor of Canada Free Press—the reason for the media blackout about the birth-certificate issue was nothing less than organized Mafia-like dire threats to members of the media issued not only from the heads of major TV and radio stations but also from Federal Communication Commission officials!
According to Hagmann and McLeod, who conducted a nine-month investigation and documented their findings scrupulously, after Obama was elected but before he was inaugurated:
A major TV talk-show host reported that he was ordered not to raise the birth certificate issue or risk losing his job.
FCC officials threatened to yank broadcasting licenses, break up conglomerates, and make the enactment of the Fairness Doctrine “look mild” in comparison to other consequences.
In at least one corporate TV headquarters, memos were circulated to all on-air employees not to mention the birth certificate issue, as well as other specific subjects like Obama’s Illinois lawyer’s license, his college records, etc., under both implied and explicit threats.
During the interview, Hagmann and McLeod—who never mentioned a particular network by name—alluded to e-mails and other evidence in their possession, copies of which, they said, were secreted in several locations. But they did tantalize listeners with descriptions of meeting with “sources” outside of St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York City, a high-placed contact looking nervously over his shoulder, references to directives and warnings given by “those at the top,” and the undisguised threat of one executive to his underlings: “This is serious, and so will the consequences be if anyone chooses not to be a team player with this.”
November 6th, 2009 @ 2:09 pm
I suggested to Orly that one of the Congress people should read the charges against Obama into the congressional record. That would force the Supreme Court to pay attention, and would force Congress’ hand.
If the Pentagon Papers hadn’t been read into the record by Sen. Mike Gavel, years ago, nothing would have been done about that corruption. I figure if it worked once, it may work again. We only need ONE Congress person with the guts to do it.
November 6th, 2009 @ 11:58 pm
I fear that ALL 535 Members of Congress know the terrible truth and their silence (or obfuscation) proves their complicity in the crime.
November 7th, 2009 @ 10:32 am
That thought is scary as hell, but I fear you may be right.