Order by the Chief Judge of the Supreme court of MS to hold the case in abayance until the Federal judge decides on the motion to remand to the state court
Posted on | May 5, 2012 | 6 Comments
MS Order by the Chief Justice to hold in abeyance
Comment from Orly:
my guess is that the Federal judge Wingate will not remand. The Dem AG and the Dem party are too sure in him. He will keep the case and will probably rule for Obama, no matter what I bring forward. Typically, from what I’ve seen, these judges couldn’t care less about the truth, the evidence and the damage they cause to the country. It will probably go to the 5th. There we’ll have to see.
A positive development, is that I got word that Mr. Sorensen in AL filed a judicial misconduct complaint against Judge Leigh in AL. If you recall, she was that nasty judge, who did not even respond to pro hac vice request from me, did not allow plaintiffs ny time extensions to get a layer and respond, she attacked mr Sorensen and others with sanctions. She really deserves to be thrown off the bench. She should be also sued for violation of the civil rights of the citizens under the color of authority. There are a few judges that need to be prosecuted together with her. Federal judge in GA Clay D. Land is one of them.
Comments
6 Responses to “Order by the Chief Judge of the Supreme court of MS to hold the case in abayance until the Federal judge decides on the motion to remand to the state court”
Leave a Reply












Alan Keyes - Loyal to Liberty
FedUpUSA.Net
Rick Baker Show
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

The People's Senator. 






May 5th, 2012 @ 6:01 am
“my guess is that the Federal judge Coleman will not remand”
COLEMAN was the senior Mississippi state judge who was assigned as the special judge in the state case, and who recused himself. WINGATE is the federal judge assigned to the case in the U.S. District Court for Southern District of Mississippi. You might want to edit your post.
May 5th, 2012 @ 7:06 am
you are right FLo, it was a typo, I corrected it
May 5th, 2012 @ 7:27 am
Do you have a link to the case Mr. Sorensen is filing against Judge Helen Shores Lee? Or is it yet to be filed?
May 6th, 2012 @ 8:09 am
“She [the judge] should be also sued for violation of the civil rights of the citizens under the color of authority.”
Unfortunately, while the Civil Rights act says you can sue “Every person,” judges have “interpreted” the word “every” to exclude themselves. (And prosecutors.) They have given themselves absolute immunity. But “absolute immunity corrupts absolutely.”
Unfortunately, Congress bolstered that with the 1996 Federal Courts Improvement Act when Congress put judges are above the law.
The way the law is currently written and interpreted, a judge could murder someone in court, but as long as he does it with his robe on, he is immune.
We have to chip away at this. The Supreme Court building says “Equal Justice under law” and that means “Every person.”
For the best treatise on this unfortunate state of law, see the Ninth Circuit’s Section 1983 Outline at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/guides/Section_1983/Sec_1983_Outline.pdf
May 6th, 2012 @ 1:29 pm
Couldn’t you file a motion to reconsider with the Mississippi supreme court?
May 6th, 2012 @ 3:20 pm
you need to pick your battles.