OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

O’Reilly is a conceited prig

Posted on | October 28, 2009 | 5 Comments

Dawn Duff

I am so disgusted with that idiot O’Reilly
O’Reilly finally “lowers” himself to mention the Birthers issue. He is a (NOT) know-it-all conceited prig. How’s that for the word of the day?
After months of ignoring the BO eligibility question, O’Reilly talked about Orly Taitz getting fined for frivolous lawsuits and in that superior snotty way he has, he announced that she represented a member of the military who didn’t want to go to Afghanistan so tried to say BO wasn’t eligible to give orders. It freaks me out that either A. He would SAY that to belittle the issue or B. He really doesn’t know any better. Come on, either way, NO EXCUSE. Then the 2 female legal heads he has on both slobberingly agreed with him – stating with all their attorney-type-gravitas that “we all know he was born in the US – he has a Hawaiian birth cert.” . Complete fools – are they really that stupid? Do they really NOT KNOW the matter has NOTHING TO DO with WHERE he was born, but WHO his father was? Or again, are they part of this game that even FOX NEWS is playing, right along with the other networks?? I’ve listed two links below to go to and some very intelligent comments from an active duty soldier:
https://legalwatch.blogtownhall.com/
Pieter writes:
As far as the birth certificate questions, natural born, and whatever else is bugging you about Mr. Obama’s candidacy…it’s the courts or nothing (ambiguity).
The Presidency and the Constitution
Additional thoughts from a dumb active duty American Soldier-
1. We live in a constitutional republic. Period. Republics derive their validity based on the rule of law. Folks who cry “will of the people” and pick and choose which rules are to be obeyed or ignored are treading a path of potential tyranny (at the very least an illegitimate government). Ask yourself if you want President Bush to hold a third term contrary to the 22nd Amendment.
2. Mr. Obama’s birth certificate issue is a clever ploy to obfuscate the true measure of his eligibility to be President. He is/was a constitutional lawyer; he’s stated that he is a “native” born American with dual citizenship; There should be no doubt he understood ambiguity existed as to his constitutional eligibility to hold the office of the President regarding Article II. The obligation is upon those that SEEK public office to prove eligibility beyond a shadow of a doubt (to self and constituency). To swear an oath to protect, uphold, and defend the Constitution to hold that office with knowing that ambiguity existed is criminal and disingenuous.
3. Who should care that candidates meet eligibility requirements to hold office? Why is it important that requirements are created, expected, and complied? What are the consequences in this situation for malfeasance / misfeasance regarding the highest guiding document of our Nation? What would our founding fathers say about this current situation? https://federalistblog.us/2007/09/revisiting_subject_to_the_jurisdiction.html
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

5 Responses to “O’Reilly is a conceited prig”

  1. sick of corruption
    October 28th, 2009 @ 12:28 pm

    FOLKS THE BEST GUY TO READ ON HOW TO learn true OBJECTIVITY IS JOEL SKOUSEN site called world affairs brief.. FORMER MILITARY AND GREAT ABOUT WEEDING OUT THE B.S. AND HE IS A CONSTITUTIONAL MAN..just fyi helped me a lot

  2. Jules Sarran
    October 28th, 2009 @ 2:07 pm

    Dang right. I’m just about totally fed up with O’reilly.
    I should have known something was up when he coddled Obama.

  3. Brenda D Steed
    October 28th, 2009 @ 2:08 pm

    Yes he brushed over it, did not give Dr. Taitz a chance to defend herself and the picture they showed of her full face was not really very flattering. I wrote O’Reilly and told him this is a constitutional matter and serious and should be treated as such, along with respect for Dr. Taitz and what she and all of us are trying to achieve, the Truth.

    I have had mixed feelings about FOX, I had a feeling they were playing two ends against the middle. I think I will boycott him anyways he is too cocky. Also I found out that some middle eastern millionaire holds a lot of shares of FOX and he threatened to pull his stock outif they did not support Obama. What with Soros threatening to pull out, he owns the dems and him throwing his weight around with the medical care reform, we are in great shape.

    How we got in this mess I’ll never know…

  4. Jane-101
    October 28th, 2009 @ 6:23 pm

    I may be completely out of my tree, but I’m starting to have some hunches about how Fox reports on the eligibility issue. My mother used to work for a psychologist and she’d tell me “it’s not what they say but WHY they say it.” I’ve heard Glenn Beck say on his tv and radio show that there are things he believes that he will never say but will never say anything he doesn’t believe. I have noticed him bring up the “birther” issue a couple times on his radio show (almost cryptically) with no comment about it but doesn’t knock the issue. I also remember Dr. Taitz saying someone from Glenn Beck was a friend on her facebook page. I do know that Beck employs quite a few researchers to stay on these trails and to expose them when he knows it’s appropriate and can be completely backed up with proof. I had read about a month ago from a Canadian paper and from an internet interview that the major networks were told NOT to bring up the Obama eligibility issue (not sure how true that is). The Fox situation was found out through a receptionist who saw a memo (wish I could find that interview link again) either about the issue or when the 4 main personalities on Fox were called in for a meeting on it. Again, I’m unsure how true that part is but the word was that they were advised to not bring up the issue. I heard Beck say on his radio show he fears some media will be forced off air; that there are things he couldn’t say right out but would resort to saying them “cryptically”. I’ve also heard Rush Limbaugh cryptically bringing up the “birther” issue occasionally with no bad comments. Beck and O’Reilly have a mutual respect for one another and it’s possible there could be underlying reasons why they’d “rile up” the public on the eligibility issue. As I started out with this, I could be out of my tree, but it wouldn’t surprise me if they’d use a bit of “reverse psychology” to make people mad in order for the issue to be brought up (especially if they were ordered not to). Just think…..with all these letters I’m seeing posted here to the O’Reilly Factor asking him to bring you on the show, what better way to make an excuse to bring you on? Just bringing up the issue at all may cause the next couple thousand viewers who may not be aware of you to start doing a search. Most Americans do care about the Constitution and certainly do not want a bloodless Communist coup in Washington, D.C. Let’s hope and pray that they are attempting to bring up the issue in any way they can.

  5. Jane-101
    October 28th, 2009 @ 6:26 pm

    And to top that off, November is a major sweeps month. They may be setting up the issue to boost their viewership.