“Go after the leprechaun O’Reilly, tell fox to remove this fraud”
Posted on | October 28, 2009 | 3 Comments
| susan rajchel |
Submitted on 2009/10/27 at 11:31pm
Everyone go after the leprechaun, O’reilly, tell Fox to remove this fraud, he is no better than MSNBC and Beck should take his prime spot his ratings are far more reaching! |
Will Al.Koontz from nsea report the truth to the public? |
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
3 Responses to ““Go after the leprechaun O’Reilly, tell fox to remove this fraud””












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

October 28th, 2009 @ 1:06 am
While you are in Fox….check out that story about MoveOn.org pressuring the Dems to pass the public option in the health care bill or they threaten loss of support from the MoveOn.org members. Well, we all know that George Soros is behind that website. Can we safely say that it isn’t Obama running the show, but Soros making the decisions concerning our country? I always suspected that Obama was just a puppet for somebody (or several somebodies) higher up with BIG money. Guess they are no longer afraid to come out in the open with it now. Soros has wanted to take America down for a very long time.
October 28th, 2009 @ 1:19 am
Right on, Rajchel. I have written him scads of emails already. At one point, when I was a premium member of his O’Reilly Club, it became very clear to me that he was a latent “double agent” if you will. He continually made Obama look like a worthy candidate during the campaign. I finally wrote a personal note to him saying if he did not stop giving little support “plugs” to Obama, I would resign my membership. And I did. Now I will inform FOX that this hidden Obama supporter is not worthy of broadcasting on FOX. They would improve their ratings if they send him packing to CNN or MSNBC or one of the Big Three. Let him do his damage to our sovereignty somewhere else. Calling O’Reilly a phony would be tantamount to awarding him a high compliment. We should recommend him for the next Nobel Peace Prize for his constant support of Obama, trying to keep him palatable to the American people.
October 28th, 2009 @ 1:43 am
I am so disgusted with that idiot O’Reilly
O’Reilly finally “lowers” himself to mention the Birthers issue. He is a (NOT) know-it-all conceited prig. How’s that for the word of the day?
After months of ignoring the BO eligibility question, O’Reilly talked about Orly Taitz getting fined for frivolous lawsuits and in that superior snotty way he has, he announced that she represented a member of the military who didn’t want to go to Afghanistan so tried to say BO wasn’t eligible to give orders. It freaks me out that either A. He would SAY that to belittle the issue or B. He really doesn’t know any better. Come on, either way, NO EXCUSE. Then the 2 female legal heads he has on both slobberingly agreed with him – stating with all their attorney-type-gravitas that “we all know he was born in the US – he has a Hawaiian birth cert.” . Complete fools – are they really that stupid? Do they really NOT KNOW the matter has NOTHING TO DO with WHERE he was born, but WHO his father was? Or again, are they part of this game that even FOX NEWS is playing, right along with the other networks?? I’ve listed two links below to go to and some very intelligent comments from an active duty soldier:
https://legalwatch.blogtownhall.com/
Pieter writes:
As far as the birth certificate questions, natural born, and whatever else is bugging you about Mr. Obama’s candidacy…it’s the courts or nothing (ambiguity).
The Presidency and the Constitution
Additional thoughts from a dumb active duty American Soldier-
1. We live in a constitutional republic. Period. Republics derive their validity based on the rule of law. Folks who cry “will of the people” and pick and choose which rules are to be obeyed or ignored are treading a path of potential tyranny (at the very least an illegitimate government). Ask yourself if you want President Bush to hold a third term contrary to the 22nd Amendment.
2. Mr. Obama’s birth certificate issue is a clever ploy to obfuscate the true measure of his eligibility to be President. He is/was a constitutional lawyer; he’s stated that he is a “native” born American with dual citizenship; There should be no doubt he understood ambiguity existed as to his constitutional eligibility to hold the office of the President regarding Article II. The obligation is upon those that SEEK public office to prove eligibility beyond a shadow of a doubt (to self and constituency). To swear an oath to protect, uphold, and defend the Constitution to hold that office with knowing that ambiguity existed is criminal and disingenuous.
3. Who should care that candidates meet eligibility requirements to hold office? Why is it important that requirements are created, expected, and complied? What are the consequences in this situation for malfeasance / misfeasance regarding the highest guiding document of our Nation? What would our founding fathers say about this current situation? https://federalistblog.us/2007/09/revisiting_subject_to_the_jurisdiction.html