OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Who would be an ideal additional plaintiff?

Posted on | October 8, 2009 | 6 Comments

Hundreds of people have contacted me asking to be additional plaintiffs in legal actions against Obama due to his illegitimacy for presidency. All of these people are taxpayers and, according to Flast v Cohen, they all do have standing.

 I am  trying to bring resolution to this issue as soon as possible and I prefer to add people who have additional injury- anything that happened after Jan 20 2009, after Obama’s inauguration. It can be an injury that was sustained or imminent: for example if someone is about to be deployed under Obama’s orders and he is not willing to go until Obama provides proof of legitimacy for presidency with real documents and not that photo shopped garbage he posted on the Internet- that is a case of imminent injury.

If you were deployed after Jan 20th, if you were wounded, lost a loved one; husband, wife, parent, child; if your car dealership was taken in this insane socialist power grab by the Obama regime, if you worked for the car dealership and lost your job- all of these are examples of specific injury.

On a different note I will have  a hearing within a couple of weeks against Wells Fargo. If you got a mortgage from Wells Fargo,  the bank  sold your note to someone else and is still  collecting mortgage from you or foreclosing your home, contact me 949-683-5411 or dr_taitz@yahoo.com

Category: HOT ITEMS!, Legal Actions

Comments

6 Responses to “Who would be an ideal additional plaintiff?”

  1. TurnRight
    October 8th, 2009 @ 9:52 pm

    If you can add plaintiffs after a first series of plaintiffs are formalized… the health care bill, should it pass and get signed, with a mandatory dipping into bank accounts and fines and/or imprisonments for those who don’t want to play… will provide hundreds of thousands of litigants.

    I like what Steve Neuenschwander said about the two olive branches. But can you be effective at trial without discovery, or can an order for discovery be issued so close to the trial date that Obie’s guys can’t react in time with an appeal?

    If I understand what Steve is intending, the parties on the other side… Peloosey and Clanton and the rest… wouldn’t be deposed, but would open themselves up to perjury charges by way of their testimony on the stand at trial. I’ll bet they’ll sell out Obama in a heartbeat in order to have you not call them to the stand. Hillary is the one who knows all, and Nanci is the one who abetted all. Yeah, and don’t forget Diane Feinstine. She was in charge of vetting on the Senate side.

    Watch out if they all get on the same plane together during the trial.

    “WILL THE DEFENDANTS PLEASE RISE.”

  2. friedrich
    October 8th, 2009 @ 10:30 pm

    BO is obviously above the Constitution and need not prove his eligibilty, right? So how come when I tried the same thing, the employer wouldn’t go for it. I held back my SS#, but put in my passport. Sorry, no job; they reneged. So, I got injured by the BO example and, clearly, there’s a double standard. The requirements for a college lecturer are obviously more strenuous than the requirements for POTUS. Can’t wait ’til I get pulled over for a seat belt violation. “Sorry, officer, no driver’s license for you until BO shows me his birth certificate.” Equal protection? mmm…mmm…mmm.

  3. John G. Freeman
    October 9th, 2009 @ 12:07 am

    Orly,

    As I have been pushing toward a complaint/suit against the Pennsylvania Department of Education for incorrectly teaching a serious point of government education (violating their own curricula) in statements such as “Obama is our 44th President,” I have found this an excellent opportunity, another avenue, to fix this greatest Constitutional and national security violation.

    Everyone around the nation should “follow suit.”

    You are the world’s hero, whether they realize it or not.

    John G. Freeman
    Veteran and Member
    Commander-in-Chief’s Guard and Escort to the President
    Washington, D. C., 1980 – 1983 | Carter and Reagan

  4. friedrich
    October 9th, 2009 @ 8:27 am

    Three-step program to shut down the govt. —

    1) Don’t sell to the govt.
    2) Don’t work for the govt.
    3) Don’t collaborate with the govt.

    Who is John Galt?

  5. friedrich
    October 9th, 2009 @ 8:34 am

    I just issued my own “executive order” denying access to any and all of my records and, in addition, as part of this EO, I’m returning my SSN to the issuers. Can you recommend a team of lawyers to enforce my EO?

  6. Carl Manning
    October 9th, 2009 @ 1:10 pm

    Dr Taitz,

    I was just wondering if you ever contacted Chuck Baldwin who was the Presidential candidate for the Constitution Party. He was eligible in almost all States in the Union. Like Alan Keyes, who finished second to Chuck Baldwin in the Constitution Party’s nomination proceedings, he definitely has “standing”. I believe Chuck has sincere doubts about the Constitutional qualifications of the usurper, our beloved Teleprompter-in-Chief. You can probably reach Chuck Baldwin through his website, chuckbaldwinlive.com, or at constitutionparty.com or constitutionparty.org.

    Thank you sincerely for your diligence and uncommon valor, and I pray for God to bless your efforts at justice for the American People to expose the forces of darkness in high places.

    Carl Manning
    Constitution Party – Savannah, GA