A very good day today
Posted on | September 28, 2009 | 16 Comments
I think all those prayers help. Today I had two of my motions granted.
1. Judge Carter had granted my motion for surreply. I can provide 10 more pages of argument and all the necessary attachments by October 1st.
a number of my supporters and followers have sent FOIA requests for information. It is hard for me to find some of them amongst over 80,000 e-mails. If you had sent FOIA requests and did or did not get answers, please e-mail to me under heading FOIA to dr_taitz @yahoo.com.
If you send requests for info on tampering with passport records, send those to me.
I need those two FOIA requests of the Selective service certificate. ( I remember there were 2 with different info provided by the government)
I need FOIA requests for info on travel, passport records and other state dep info.
Mr. Ken Allen -I need certified copies from you ASAP.
Mr. Chris Strunk I need certified copies from you ASAP
My buddy Devvy Kidd- I need certified copies from you – particularly from the registrars of the u of Wa and HI (Stanley Ann Dunham’s alma mater in 1961 was U of WA not U of HI)- the copies you sent me weren’t notarized.
I need a certified copy and affidavit from MR. Wilson- about 2 certificates of candidate signed by Pelosi.
Did anyone already send send a FOIA on that one
Will this Miss Trigy provide a cert. copy?
I need an affidavit, FOIA request and whatever you have in re to homicide of Lt. Querles Harris and Donald Young
Any FOIA requests for info from Kapiolani hospital, Queens hospital and S traub clinic?
Mr. Kurt Fuqua-I need you cert copies.
Any FOIA requests on the arrests of Vivek Kundra and Aqair ( according to WA times forged birth certificates were found at the apartment of Aqair – assistant chief of cyber security for Obama)
Any FOIA requests for the unredacted report on the passport tampering.
I will provide more info tomorrow.
2. Judge Land in GA granted my motion to withdraw as counsel. the reason, i had to do it, since Cpt Connie Rhodes was under tremendous pressure, intimidation by the military and department of defense and she stated that she didn’t want to proceed under this pressure. Now I don’t have my hands tied behind my back, I can provide more info, now I can do more on my own behalf.
3. I am submitting today a notice of appeal in FL on behalf of Major Cook . While his orders to deploy were revoked by the military, he was a victim of retaliation and the military pressured his employer to fire him. We are seeking damages. Notice of appeal in GA was already filed.
4. as you know, I came from South Dakota yesterday, where I had a very productive meeting with the community leaders. State House of Representatives Majority Whip has shown interest in working on this matter. I have forwarded documents to him. He will be holding meetings with other legislators this coming weekend
I appreciate all the donations. Those help pay for $450 each appeal form, $400 or so each transcript, $500-600 each airplane ticket and so on.
Special thanks to Donna and Garland Petersen, their twins and grandma Betty (name sake of my grandma) for their great hospitality in South Dakota. I will post the pictures and video, when I get them.
The following transaction was entered on 9/28/2009 at 3:07 PM PDT and filed on 9/28/2009
| Case Name: | Captain Pamela Barnett, et al v. Barack Hussein Obama, et al |
| Case Number: | 8:09-cv-82 |
| Filer: | |
| Document Number: | 76 |
Docket Text:
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: REQUEST FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE SUR-REPLY [75]: The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion and will give Plaintiffs leave of court to file a surreply not to exceed ten (10) pages to be filed by 5 p.m. on October 1, 2009. Plaintiffs’ courtesy copy of the sur-reply shall be delivered to the Court’s dropbox on the ninth floor of the Santa Ana courthouse by no later than noon on October 2, 2009. The Clerk shall serve this minute order on all parties to the action. (rla)
Comments
16 Responses to “A very good day today”
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
September 28th, 2009 @ 9:14 pm
Thank you for ALL that you are doing Dr. Orly!! You are a TRUE PATRIOT!! I’m sure that
you already have this info but just wanted to send it along to you!! GOD BLESS YOU!!
https://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/13056.htm
September 28th, 2009 @ 9:21 pm
Hi Dr Orly…
I am happy to hear you had a good day. I believe you are helping all citizens of the USA who still believe in our Constitution & what our fore-fathers intended so we can have Freedom & Honesty in this great country.
It is a total disgrace that hardly any of the MSM or politicans keep quite about this critical issue & keep referring to a doc’s posted online as legit. It is also incredible that all those politicans do the same even though they never been verified 100%. Many are praying & hoping the truth is revealed once-n-for all. The people have this right…
There are too many questions proving their is something not right or showing a real coverup. It is an issue that won’t go away till someone in our justice system is brave enough to get to the bottom & get the answers so we know the truth. Keep up the great work!!
September 28th, 2009 @ 10:34 pm
Dear Dr. Orly-so many people compared you to St. Joan well Queen Esther too. I sent in a prayer request for your protection and success. When I read the prayer I thought this is so Orly. God Bless you.
Prayer to Saint Joan for Faith
submitted by Gina
In the face of your enemies, in the face of harassment, ridicule and doubt, you held firm in your faith. Even in your abandonment, alone and without friends, you held firm in your faith. Even as you faced your own mortality, you held firm in your faith. I pray that I may be as bold in my beliefs as you, Saint Joan. I ask that you ride alongside me in my own battles. Help me be mindful that what is worthwhile can be won when I persist. Help me hold firm in my faith. Help me believe in my ability to act well and wisely. Amen.
September 28th, 2009 @ 11:14 pm
I may not be the smartest person here, but this looks very promising to me.
Thank you Dr Taitz.
Don Lovvo, Special Agent
USAF Office of Special Investigations, Retired
September 29th, 2009 @ 12:07 am
Gosh Orly, I just think it’s amazing. Someone from Moldavia, where ever that is, migrates to Israel and then comes over here and shows us all more about our country and our beloved Constitution than we would normally learn in a lifetime. Were you a man, you would make a heck of a linebacker.
How are we to express what you have done for our country? Yes, there are others currently, but I haven’t seen the dogged fight among them that I have with you. Hillary, shallow and self centered, has met her match for toughness, leave alone integrity. I will always want you on my side.
September 29th, 2009 @ 2:53 am
Dr. Orly Taitz,
Keep up the GREAT work you do! Thank you!
ckdabney
September 29th, 2009 @ 3:28 am
thepostnemail has the following: LIFE-LONG REPUBLICAN, PROMOTED FROM STATE LEGISLATURE TO FEDERAL BENCH
by John Charlton
(Sept. 28, 2009) — Judge Clay D. Land is the Federal Judge before whose bench Dr. Orly Taitz pleaded for a stay of deployment for Captain Connie Rhodes, in the case Rhodes vs. Mac Donald. Rhodes is now in Iraq, following Judge Land’s rejection of her stay.
The Post & Email will from time to time publish Spotlight reports on public officials in the news, to highlight their background and personal history, available from public sources and those who have known them in life.
A ‘Southern Boy’ turns Scholar
Clay D. Land was born in Shreveport, LA in 1960.
He attended the University of Georgia and graduated in 1982 with a Bachelor’s of Business Administration, graduating magna cum laude.
He then went on to the University of Georgia Law School, where he earned a Juris Doctor in 1985, graduating cum laude. He was a member of the staff of the Georgia Law Review and was inducted into the Order of the Coif, a honorary scholastic society for law students.
From the Bar to the Legislature
He was in private practice from 1985-2001.
In 1992, he formed the law firm Buchanan & Land LPP, with Jerry A. Buchanan; they specialized in civil litigation. Both attorneys had been partners in the Columbus law firm of Hatcher, Stubbs, Land, Hollis & Rothschild. (This Rothschild seems to have no relation to the Banking family).
Land then entered politics; starting first as a member of the Columbus City Council from 1993-1994, and then serving three terms in the Georgia General Assembly, as a state senator, from 1995-2000.
In 1996 he donated approx. $1,600 to Republican causes.
From the Legislature to the Bench
He was recommended for a seat on the Federal Judiciary by U.S. Congressman Saxyby Chambliss, a Republican.
He was nominated to the Federal Bench by George W. Bush on September 21, 2001, to a seat vacated by J. Robert Elliot; he was confirmed by a voice vote in the U.S. Senate on December 13, 2001, and received his commission on December 21, 2001.
According to the court docket there have been over 1,500 Cases filed before Judge Land.
As a Judge, Land has engaged in various charitable and civic activities with his alma mater. For example, he was enrolled in the Joseph Henry Lumpkin Society, in 2003-4 after making a charitable donation of $1,000 to $2,500 in conjunction with Shannon F. Land, and was a Board of Visitors member for the Univ. of Georgia Law School in 2004-5.
Financial Disclosures have been problematic
Judicial Watch publishes the public financial disclosures of Judge Land. A number of them have had to be amended due to an apparent failure of Judge Land to keep track of his numerous investments.
In 2003, Judge Land had to follow a follow up report for failure to report various investments in Mirant Common Stock and Worldcom Common Stock.
His reports filed for the years 2003-7 list investments in many of the largest companies backing Barack Obama, such as Microsoft and Comcast.
In his 2004 report he also lists and investment with Time Warner, Inc..
In this 2005 report he lists salary from Buchanan & Land, LLP.
In his 2006 report he adds a follow up report, once again, for failure to disclose some 25 investments in Banks and Mutual Funds; in addition to his 62 other investments in a slew of companies. He also reported income once again from his law firm.
In this 2007 report he claims income as a self-employed lawyer, and that from his law firm Buchanan & Land LLP, along with 56 other investments in Mutual Funds, Banks and other industries and services.
It is difficult to understand how, with so many varied investments, Judge Land has managed to avoid conflicts of interest in the numerous cases he has heard. Moreover, seeing that many of these companies would be impacted if the laws signed by Barack Hussein Obama’s were declared null and void, on account of his lack of eligibility for office, it also seems reasonable to ask why Judge Land did not recuse himself in the case Rhodes vs. Mac Donald.
Posted in Law Cases, People in the News | Tagged Buchanan & Land LPP, Captain Connie Rhodes, Dr. Orly Taitz, George W. Bush, Georgia Law Review, Hatcher, Hollis & Rothschild., J. Robert Elliot, Joseph Henry Lumpkin Society, Judge Clay D. Land, Land, Order of the Coif, Rhodes vs. Mac Donald, Saxyby Chambliss, Shannon F. Land, Stubbs, University of Georgia, University of Georgia Law School | 2 Comments
September 29th, 2009 @ 3:41 am
Orly – Congratulations on your victories today. While I don’t understand what “surreply” means, I do know it is cause for celebration. I hope you are keeping a very detailed journal of everything you have done on your journey to truth. After this is over and Obama and his miserable crew are only bad memories, your experiences through it all will make a wonderful book – maybe even a movie. We hope future generations can look back on this as the beginning of a massive clean-up to rid our country of the filth and corruption that nearly destroyed it. We still have a long, rough road ahead, but the hardships will wake up those who are still in denial. Then, and only then, will this country be back on the road to becoming what it once was. You are our hero.
Be very careful. There are many out there that now, more than ever, want to see you destroyed. Take full advantage of your second amendment rights, and do not hesitate to protect and defend yourself and your family in any way you think is necessary. The “big boys” are fighting for their miserable lives, and they are evil, powerful, and they will stop at nothing. God is with you and will help you, but he often his help comes in the form of knowledge and strength. You have millions of people praying for you every day, and every one of us is extremely grateful for the work you have done.
Mary
September 29th, 2009 @ 9:03 am
Dr. Taitz, yes, God answers our prayers. He is so good to us. Let us give all our praises and thanks to the Lord for what He has done thru you. We all stand behind you as you are constantly fighting to restore America. We are praying that God will protect you and your family and that He will give you wisdom and strength in preparing yourself for the court on Friday and Monday.
Blessings.
Anne
September 29th, 2009 @ 9:48 am
Article II, Section 1, Clause 5: No person except a natural born citizen …shall be eligible to the office of President.
The issue of whether or not Obama is “eligible to the office of President” depends upon whether or not he is an Article II “natural born citizen” of the United States.
The phrase “natural born citizen” “must be interpreted in the light of the common law, the principles and history of which were familiarly known to the framers of the Constitution” (Wong Kim Ark, Paragraph 16).
United States v. Wong Kim Ark., 18 S. Ct. 456, 169 U.S. 649 (U.S. 03/28/1898)
[1] SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
[16] The Constitution nowhere defines the meaning of these words [“citizen of the United States,” and “natural-born citizen of the United States”], either by way of inclusion or of exclusion, except in so far as this is done by the affirmative declaration that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.” In this, as in other respects, it [The Constitution] must be interpreted in the light of the common law, the principles and history of which were familiarly known to the framers of the Constitution. Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162; Ex parte Wilson, 114 U.S. 417, 422; Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 624, 625; Smith v. Alabama, 124 U.S. 465. The language of the Constitution, as has been well said, could not be understood without reference to the common law. 1 Kent Com. 336; Bradley, J., in Moore v. United States, 91 U.S. 270, 274.
The “common law, the principles and history of which were familiarly known to the framers of the Constitution” is plainly expressed in “Scott v. Sandford”, which quotes Vattel, and explicitly states, “The natives or natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens…”
Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (U.S. 01/02/1856)
[1] UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
[418] …The natives or natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens…
[419] Again:
[420] …to be of the country, it is necessary to be born of a person who is a citizen, for if he be born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country. The inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are foreigners who are permitted to settle and stay in the country. Vattel, Book 1, cap. 19, p. 101.
With regard to citizenship issues, the Supreme Court of the United States, in The Venus, relied upon Vattel’s “Law of Nations” as the authority on citizenship issues, and stated the following:
The Venus, 12 U.S. (8 Cranch) 253, 1814
“Vattel, …is more explicit and more satisfactory on it [CITIZENSHIP ISSUES] than any other whose work has fallen into my hands, [Vattel] says, ‘…The natives, or indigenes, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.’ ”
Vattel’s Law of Nations: § 212. Citizens and natives
The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.
Finally, the Supreme Court of the United States, in Minor v. Happersett, confirmed the definition of an Article II natural born citizen as “children born in a country of parents who were its citizens”.
Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 21 Wall. 162 162 (1874)
“No person except a natural-born citizen or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of the Constitution shall be eligible to the office of President” and that Congress shall have power “to establish a uniform rule of naturalization.” Thus, new citizens may be born or they may be created by naturalization. The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.
Suffice it to say, Article II natural born citizens, “are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”
Hence, Obama is NOT an Article II natural born citizen of the United States, even if he was born in Hawaii, as his father was a “foreigner”. Thus, Obama is NOT “eligible to the office of President”.
September 29th, 2009 @ 10:26 am
You can’t just ask for the birth certificate. According to the TerriK Investigation with Leo Denofrio, Hawaii is basically NOT denying there were amendments to the birth records…PLEASE ask for ALL birth records.
Original, amended, etc.
Thank you Orly Taitz.
September 29th, 2009 @ 1:40 pm
Great news!
Don’t make it just about obooboo, or let it seem to be about partisan politics. Make it about the Constitution. If you can squeeze it in, make reference to Bobby Jindal, the rising young star of the GOP, whose parents had not been naturalized when he was born in the U.S. This makes him a U.S. citizen by birth but not natural born; hence, not eligible to run for the presidency. We’re looking for the courts to finally lay down a definitive ruling on the meaning of the term ‘natural born citizen’ as the Founding Fathers understood it, not as modern readers have taken to melding the terms ‘native born’ & ‘natural born’ until there’s no longer a clear distinction.
Have a great week to top off this great day you had yesterday.
Leon Brozyna
CW2, USA (Ret)
September 29th, 2009 @ 3:59 pm
Things sound so much better now – yes indeed. But let’s not count those chickens before any of them hatch, ok troopers Obama is now doing things it seems to tick off all Americans. He is one guy who is very difficult to understand. The entire world knows by now he is not an American and many Europeans cannot understand how our system works, allowing him to toss his hat into a ring that is off limits to him. He does indeed have the guts AND LETS NOT FORGET THAT, we must forever be sensitive to the fact that many high ranking Americans are on his side. Why, I will never know, but the facts speak for themselves.
Congrats, Dear Orly, for your finding that light at the end of the tunnel. I feel very strongly that it is not a freight train coming from the other end. LOL. We are so fortunate to have an iron clad persona for our leader.
One final request from you troopers. Please send a monthly contribution to Orly now. Those of you who can afford it, send her at least one hundred dollars each month. Believe me, her expenses are piling up very high. Let’s dig in fellow Americans, that is the least we can do.
September 29th, 2009 @ 7:54 pm
Dearest Orly,
When I read this last night I was so excited I could barely breathe. Good luck to you all this week and especially on Friday and Monday. My thoughts and prayers are with you. I love you so much. Stay safe. God Speed and God Bless.
September 30th, 2009 @ 2:46 am
Orly, I hope that you can add to your discovery obama’s Police Records under all of his assumed names.
I think it was 2 cops in GA and 1 in PA who attempted to run a police check on Obama, when they made the inquiry it went directly to the secret service and their respective departments were notified of their attempt to uncover info.
If there was no police record I don’t know if the secret service would be monitoring his records so closely if any.
October 12th, 2009 @ 2:59 am
cool nice site