18 Responses to “Extremely important, help needed. Document filed by SSA and the original affidavit by FOIA officer Dawn Wiggins disappeared from the electronic record, need a copy of the missing record from the public”

1. Anonymous
   March 9th, 2014 @ 5:02 pm

   Obama declares a national emergency by Executive Order because of Ukraine
   Submitted by go213mph on Sun, 03/09/2014 – 17:27
   in
   Politics, General + Law(s)
   I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, find that the actions and policies of persons — including persons who have asserted governmental authority in the Crimean region without the authorization of the Government of Ukraine — that undermine democratic processes and institutions in Ukraine; threaten its peace, security, stability, sovereignty, and territorial integrity; and contribute to the misappropriation of its assets, constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.

   I hereby order:

   Section 1. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person (including any foreign branch) of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State:

   (i) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have engaged in, directly or indirectly, any of the following:

   (A) actions or policies that undermine democratic processes or institutions in Ukraine;

   (B) actions or policies that threaten the peace, security, stability, sovereignty, or territorial integrity of Ukraine; or

   (C) misappropriation of state assets of Ukraine or of an economically significant entity in Ukraine;

   (ii) to have asserted governmental authority over any part or region of Ukraine without the authorization of the Government of Ukraine;

   (iii) to be a leader of an entity that has, or whose members have, engaged in any activity described in subsection (a)(i) or (a)(ii) of this section or of an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order;

   (iv) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any activity described in subsection (a)(i) or (a)(ii) of this section or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

   (v) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.

   (b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the effective date of this order.

   Sec. 2. I hereby find that the unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens determined to meet one or more of the criteria in subsection 1(a) of this order would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and I hereby suspend entry into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, of such persons. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions).

   Sec. 3. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the type of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to section 1 of this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of this order.

   Sec. 4. The prohibitions in section 1 of this order include but are not limited to:

   (a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and

   (b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

   Sec. 5. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

   (b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

   Sec. 6. For the purposes of this order:

   (a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;

   (b) the term “entity” means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization; and

   (c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.

   Sec. 7. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 1 of this order.

   Sec. 8. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including the promulgation of rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA, as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States Government consistent with applicable law. All agencies of the United States Government are hereby directed to take all appropriate measures within their authority to carry out the provisions of this order.

   Sec. 9. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit the recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).

   Sec. 10. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

   BARACK OBAMA

   https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/03/06/execut…

   https://www.dailypaul.com/314045/obama-declares-a-national-emergency-by-executive-order-because-of-ukraine

2. Anonymous
   March 9th, 2014 @ 5:12 pm

   Did You Know Senator Ted Cruz Was A Lawyer For A Defendant In The “Kids For Cash” Scandal?

   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqW1QW59TK4

3. Michelle
   March 9th, 2014 @ 5:48 pm

   Hi Orly,

   Hope this helps?

   https://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/DirectoryByCaseAdmin.asp?CA=CIVIL8
   United States District Court for the Court of Maryland

   Case Administrator

   Name Title Location Telephone
   Stephanie Savoy Appeals & Transcripts Clerk Baltimore 410-962-3928
   Katie Nader Case Administrator Greenbelt 301-344-3102
   Amanda Otto Case Administrator Baltimore 410-962-3887

   Also don’t know if Maryland/Baltimore is using the same weird e-filing system w/ sealed docs in public cases but here is link to check out:

   https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/dcd/sealed

   Best,

   Michelle

4. Paula Hoehn
   March 10th, 2014 @ 1:05 am

   Dear Orly,

   I am not sure exactly what the document is that you need, but does this pertain?

   https://web.archive.org/web/20130813235144/https://www.scribd.com/doc/159668467/Taitz-Report-08-11-2013-Federal-Judge-Sits-on-Fast-and-Furious-Subpoena-for-a-Year

   SSA response and Reply from attorney Taitz were posted on Google+, LinkdIn, Facebook, Twitter and SCRIBD
   Posted on | August 9, 2013 | 2 Comments

   Taitz Report, New Documentation Received From SSA

   Category: Uncategorized

   Press release: more information received today from the SSA. FOIA officer was given until September 9th to provide SS-5 of Harry Bounel, whose Social Security number 042-68-4425 Obama fraudulently used in his 2009 tax returns
   Posted on | August 9, 2013 | 5 Comments

   Press release Law offices of Orly Taitz A FOIA response to 04.26.2013 request was received today in the Law Office of Orly Taitz. (See response attached below) A response that was required to be provided within 20 working days was received only after 4 months. There are a number issues and concerns related to this response.

   1. Social Security administration is claiming that they cannot find records for Harrison (Harry) J. Bounel. Attorney Orly Taitz responded immediately to the claim of inability to find records and FedExed today such response and attachment, showing that on November 16, 2012 SSA had the records for Harry Bounel and refused to provide them due to considerations of privacy.

   In 2013, when SSA received the request with notation that Bounel was born in 1890, considered to be an “extremely aged individual” and he privacy excuse no longer applies, they are claiming that they do not have records. Taitz noted that the only discrepancy was that in 2012 the letter noted Harry Bounel, without middle initial, while in 2013 the request included middle initial. In order to put an end to any and all further excuses, Taitz submitted today yet another request for SS-5 for Harry Bounel without initial “J”, as well as another check and FOIA request. Due to FOIA 20 day provision, the response has to be received by Taitz on September 9th, 2013.

   This is a matter of National security, as Bounel’s SSN 042-68-4425 was used by Barack Obama in his 2009 tax returns. Incidentally, as decision from Judge Lamberth in Taitz v Astrue is expected any day now, suddenly, nearly 4 months after the request was made, SSA is providing a response and coincidentally the very same a very reclusive former commissioner of SSN, Michael Astrue, appeared on National TV on FOX . Noteworthy, is that Obama did not nominate a new commissioner, who would be subject to congressional grilling and approval, but is using Carolyn Colvin, as a temporary acting commissioner.

   2. This is the second time Taitz is requesting SS-5 for Stanley Ann Dunham, deceased mother of Barack Obama. It is of interest that the first time Taitz received only one form. Today she received three different forms. Based on the information received today Ann Dunham changed her SSA card twice: in 1963 and 1995. There are a few areas that Taitz is investigating and asking her supporters to assist in such investigation:

   a. according to Obama’s official biography, when he was growing up, Ann Dunham was a poor single mother on Social Security. Additionally, when she was older and was afflicted with cancer, according to Obama, his health insurance company denied benefits, so it was widely assumed that the benefits came from the SSA. However, according to the letter July 29, 2013 from Dawn Wiggins, FOIA officer, which was received by Taitz today, Ann Dunham never received any SSA benefits. Taitz is trying to reconcile these inconsistencies.

   b Signature on the three forms appear to be different. Most significant is the difference between 1959 and 1963 forms. One can see a very heavy slant to the right in the 1959 signature. You do not see this slant to the right in 1963 form. Such slant to the right is very common among individuals coming from Eastern European countries, where kids were taught to place their notebooks sideways and right with the slant to the right. There might be no significance in this, but an opinion of a writing expert will be sought and would be appreciated. Typically there should not be such a pronounced difference in the slant in the handwriting, particularly within a short period of time, only 4 years span between 1959 application and 1963 request for a change in the Social Security card. Additionally, there are some inconsistencies in the 1959 card, specifically at the bottom of the card the form number is 7-55. Under magnification one can see that two digits “5″ are of a different font and size.

   Taitz previously requested an explanation from the SSA, why the two digits in the form number are of a different size and font, no explanation was provided as of yet. c. It is not clear, why did Ann Dunham apply for a change from Dunham to Dunham Obama in 1963, when she divorced Barack Obama senior. One would expect her to change her name in February 1961, when she reportedly married Obama, not in 1963, when she divorced him.
   This application for SSN change for Ann Dunham was released for the first time today.

   d. It is not clear, why did Ann Dunham apply for yet another change of her SSN card in June of 1995. This June 1995 application for a change of the SSA card was released for the first time in SSA July 29 2013 letter to Taitz and was received today. This change was made only a few months before Ann Dunham passed away on November 7, 1995. Incidentally, November 7 happens to be the day when the Communist revolution in celebrated in Russia. Ann Dunham passed away at home with only her two children present. There was no attending physician at the time of her death, no autopsy by a coroner. Her remains were cremated and buried at sea. Typically there is a requirement for a permit for a burial at sea. There is no record of such permit ever being granted or requested. Taitz is expecting the SS-5 for Harry Bounel on September 9th. More information of FOIA requests to different agencies and ongoing legal actions will be provided later and will be available at the official web site for Attorney Taitz at OrlyTaitzESQ.com. Taitz is working pro bono. Donations to her efforts are appreciated and can be made at orlytaitzesq.com through pay-pal or mail.

   Michael Astrue

   Rosemary6:38 PM (8 hours ago) to me Michael was on Greta Wire last nite. Why is he all of a sudden showing his face in public? Very strange and he is a strange looking guy. Haven’t been able to leave a comment in two weeks on your site. Here is the Greta wire link: https://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/video/former-hhs-general-counselformer-socialsecurity-commissioner-michael-astrue-on-the-

   record/https://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/video/former-hhs-general-counselformersocial-security-commissioner-michael-astrue-on-the-record/ Rosemary, Norwalk, CT

   ——–
   Paula Hoehn

5. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   March 10th, 2014 @ 1:17 am

   no.
   I should have A HARD COPY. iT IS DOCUMENT #7 ON THE DOCKET
   Taitz v Colvin 13-1878, Judge Hollander

6. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   March 10th, 2014 @ 1:19 am

   no, someone falsified the record and deleted a document. this is Watergate #2

7. DSP2
   March 10th, 2014 @ 6:06 am

   It is time now for Zullo, Arpaio, Snowden and the Barrister to make public all the evidence now. The Federal government is being complicit in doing Barry Soetoro’s bidding. A US marshall needs to go get him or the US military now, before Barry gets on Air Force One and goes to Saudi Arabia which does not have an extradition treaty with the US.

8. Dave Simmons
   March 10th, 2014 @ 6:24 am

   If they really were “losing” a document, don’t you think they’d also change the numbering?

9. Joseph Zernik
   March 10th, 2014 @ 7:08 am

   14-02-26 UN, UPR of the United States (2014) – planned submission: Massive fraud and corruption in the US courts – unannounced regime change in the United States.

   2014 United Nations Human Rights Council, 2014 Universal Periodic Review of the United States –  deadline is now posted  – 1 September 2014 [1]

   Last time around, for the  April 2010, I was writing under tremendous pressure, with repeated threats.  It was also my first attempt at writing such report.   The threats escalated towards the deadline date, and a few days after the deadline I ended up having to escape from the United States, under clear and present danger.

   Regardless, my report was incorporated into the final UN report with the note “Corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California”. [2-4]

   The reports was based on records of the Los Angeles Superior Court and Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department alone, It documented large scale fraud in the electronic record systems of both agencies, and their use for the deprivation of rights through large scale false imprisonment and real estate fraud by banks attorneys and judges.

   In 2012, I filed for the deadline of the UPR of the State of Israel.  Again, I focused on fraud in the electronic record systems of the courts, but had hardly any cases, since I was new in Israel.  Regardless, the report was incorporated into the final UN report with the note: “Lack of integrity in the electronic records of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel.” [5-7]

   This time around, I aim higher.  Tentative title for the Human Rights Alert (NGO) for the 2014 report on the United States is:
   Massive fraud and corruption in the US courts – unannounced regime change in the United States.
   The short report (limited to 5 pages) will focus on the massive fraud in PACER and CM/ECF and the electronic records of the SCOTUS, including the failure to issue and duly docket valid summonses, issue and docket valid authentication records, invalid implementation of the Electronic Signature Act, which permit the routine conduct of simulated litigation to deprive the Constitutional, Civil and Human Rights of the people of the United State on an unprecedented scale. [8]

   The appendix (unlimited page number) will include an archive of a large number of cases, documenting such abuses in the US courts from coast to coast.

   The mission statement of Human Righs Alert (NGO), as defined ~2008:
   Discovering, archiving, and disseminating knowledge regarding abuse of the People by governments and corporations in the Robber Baron Revival Era.

   I will be happy to communicate and collaborate with others, who plan on submitting UPR reports on the United States.  

   LINKS:
   [1] US UPR 2nd cycle: 22nd session (Apr-May 2015). 
   NGO Deadline: 1 September 2014
   https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/Pages/NgosNhris.aspx  
   [2] 10-04-08 Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the UPR of the United States, as it appears in the United Nations Human Rights Council site
   https://lib.ohchr.org/HRBodies/UPR/Documents/session9/US/HRAlert_UPR_USA_S09_2010_Human%20rights%20alert1.pdf
   [3] 10-04-08 Human Rights Alert (NGO) Appendix I to submission for the 2010 UPR of Human Rights in the United States, as it appears on the UN site:
   https://lib.ohchr.org/HRBodies/UPR/Documents/session9/US/HRAlert_UPR_USA_S09_2010_Human%20rights%20alert1.pdf
   [4] 10-10-01 United Nations Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report, referring to Human Rights Alert submission with the note “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California” (page 6, paragraph 45)
   https://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G10/169/65/PDF/G1016965.pdf?OpenElement
   [5]  דוח מקוצר (מקור אנגלי) כפי שהוא מופיע באתר האו”ם) של סייג לזכויות האדם שהתקבל כחלק מדוח האו”ם לגבי זכויות האדם בישראל (2013
   https://lib.ohchr.org/HRBodies/UPR/Documents/Session15/IL/HRA_UPR_ISR_S15_2012_HumanRightsAlert_E.pdf  
   [6]  13-01-01 The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission, as incorporated into the UN Human RItghts Council UPR reprort with the note “Lack of integrity in the electronic records of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel” (page 4, paragraph 25) 
    דוח סייג לזכויות האדם נכלל בדוח מועצת זכויות האדם של האו”ם (2013) בלוויית ההערה “חוסר יושרה בכתבים האלקטרוניים של בית המשפט העליון, בתי המשפט המחוזיים, ובתי הדין למוחזקי משמורת בישראל” (עמ’ 4, פסקה 25):  
   https://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G12/180/12/PDF/G1218012.pdf?OpenElement  
   [7] 12-05-10 Human Right Alert,  Appendix I to Submission; 15th UPR – State of Israel – “Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel”
   https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8Aa2xQGbmk5cjNxd2szX05oMkU/edit?usp=sharing
   [8] 12-03-15 PRESS RELEASE: Evidence of widespread corruption of the US courts and proposed corrective measures submitted to the US House of Representatives
   https://www.scribd.com/doc/85481555/
   ____
   Joseph Zernik, PhD
   Human Rights Alert (NGO)
   https://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
   OccupyTLV
   ____
   * The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the 2010 Periodic Review Report regarding Human Rights in the United States, with the note: “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California”.
   * The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations was incorporated into the 2013 Periodic Review Report regarding Human Rights in Israel, with the note: “lack of integrity of the electronic records of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel.

10. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    March 10th, 2014 @ 7:13 am

    no, because I have a printout and many other docs relate to it

11. David Lord
    March 10th, 2014 @ 7:23 am

    Fourwinds10.com shows the #7 missing, but the file may be with #9. A restricted access, but looks like anyone could wander in there.

12. bo pe
    March 10th, 2014 @ 7:39 am

    Remember to take screenshots of anything submitted..

    Screenshots to prove it has been docketed in their ui.

    Because now they will say it never existed.

    If there is a document trail to show it was originally submitted then that helps.

13. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    March 10th, 2014 @ 7:46 am

    they can’t say it. I have a copy and multiple other docs refer to Doc #7

14. Bruriah Sarah
    March 10th, 2014 @ 1:03 pm

    Dr. Taitz

    Are there rules of the court that allow you to contest if you think that there was foul play by the court? If you have a receipt of the court documents submitted, perhaps another court can rule for your relief in regards to using a certifiable copy.

15. leo derosia
    March 10th, 2014 @ 1:31 pm

    The barry gangsters will say and do whatever they want

16. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    March 10th, 2014 @ 2:04 pm

    I’ve seen documents disappearing before, filed a complaint, still waiting for an answer

17. js/js
    March 10th, 2014 @ 6:41 pm

    Typical obstruction, destruction, and falsification of documents. As stated, Dawn Wiggins belongs in Federal prison. Book em, Danno!

18. js/js
    March 10th, 2014 @ 6:44 pm

    As stated, Dawn Wiggins belongs in Federal
    prison for this stunt, obstruction, destruction,
    and falsifications. Unacceptable, IMO. Book
    em, Danno.

Leave a Reply