8 Responses to “A report states that 2 judges forwarded evidence of Obama’s fabricated IDs to US attorneys and one Federal judge forwarded the evidence directly to the Federal Grand Jury. So far I do not have the names of these 3 judges and cannot confirm that the report is true and correct. If anyone has the actual unredacted letters from the Judges, please, forward them to me”

1. Hans
   February 6th, 2014 @ 3:52 pm

   The US AG would probably advise the Federal Grand Jury as the states, cities, towns etc do for their own grand juries. So redacted does one do to REMOVE the (redacted)… as it is represented today. A White House is emblamatif of TRUTH and NOT LIES like that (redacted) is perpetrating on the country that PUT FREEDOM FIRST for its citizens … so redacted.. need one say more ?

2. Us Citizens of total unmitigated Concern
   February 6th, 2014 @ 6:28 pm

   The letter is not real.

   Their is no proof that the letter came from the US District Court for the Western District of Washington at Seattle because Vogt has redacted the name of the court.

   There is no proof that the letter was authored by a Judge because Vogt has redacted both the name and title of the author.

   There is no proof that the letter stated that the matter would be sent to a Grand Jury because Vogt has redacted the contents of the letter.

   The only thing that you have here is Vogt flapping his gums so believe it if you want to.

3. Kaduku
   February 6th, 2014 @ 6:37 pm

   Read about 85% of the Affidavit, and this is one HUGE PLUS in getting this USURPER MUSLIM IMPOSTER OUT OF OFFICE TRIED FOR ALL OF HIS FELONY CRIMES… ESPECIALLY TREASON!

   ** SEND TO TEXAS AFTER HIS SENTENCING… THE MUSLIM WILL KNOW HIS FATE THEN **

4. Brian Reilly
   February 6th, 2014 @ 8:53 pm

   The redacted letter tells us absolutely nothing.

5. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   February 7th, 2014 @ 1:20 am

   yes, Brian this letter maybe a total nothing. the judge might be saying: you wrote a nice letter, but I have no jurisdiction or go to the DA. If there is such a letter, why hide it? It can be used as a precedent to seek jurisdiction in other courts. Until we see an actual letter, it is nothing

6. Malcolm Fredrickson
   February 7th, 2014 @ 8:34 am

   Does the letter have the embossed court seal?

7. Connie
   February 8th, 2014 @ 9:06 am

   Orly, When I clicked on your report above, Google Chrome blocked the report, and warned me that there was dangerous maleware hope I spelled it right, a dangerous threat to my computer.

   I backed out of it.

   Bless you for all of your hard work, I am amazed at your ability to keep up this endeavor, you are loved and appreciated more than words can ever say!!

   With love to all,
   Connie

8. js/js
   February 8th, 2014 @ 3:29 pm

   Yes, the censorship on GOOGLE continues now
   nationwide. No end in sight by Brinn, IMO.
   As for the letters to Judges, the wnd.com site
   notes that Vogt did send out 175 packets to
   various judges, to be confirmed, and then
   sent to local AG’s and DAG’s. Contact Doug
   Vogt soon. VIP item. Very good work by Doug.
   He should be commended by all. This mess has
   got to stop and be corrected. Judges must act,
   AG’s must act, Congress must act. The final
   showdown is upon us, IMO. We cannot turn back,
   or turn away from Lady Liberty, Mother Freedom.
   IMO.

Leave a Reply