OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Update: No decisio0ns yet in 7 Obama cases. No new date for October in the 4th District. Waiting for DOJ to file a response in the case of Obama’s use of a stolen SSN of Harry Bounel and in the case of Obama using a fabricated stamp on his Selective Service certificate

Posted on | September 9, 2013 | 6 Comments

4th Appellate District Division 3

 

District 1

 

District 2

 

District 3

 

District 4 Div 1

 

District 4 Div 2

 

District 4 Div 3

 

District 5

 

District 6

 
Court data last updated: 09/09/2013 09:05 AM

Docket (Register of Actions)
Taitz v. Obama et al.
Case Number G047746

 

01/15/2013 Appeal dismissed per rule 8.140(b).     THE COURT: Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.140(b)(1), the appeal filed December 3, 2012, is DISMISSED for appellant’s failure to designate the record on appeal in a timely manner and for failure to file a Civil Case Information Statement pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.100(g), after notice that appellant was in default.. Appellant is advised that this dismissal will become final as to this court 30 days after the date of this order, at which time this court will lose the power to vacate, reconsider or modify it. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.264(b)(1).)
01/24/2013 Motion for relief from default filed.     By aplt, mtn to reinstate appeal
01/24/2013 To court.     Aplt’s mtn for relief from default and to reinstate appeal.
01/28/2013 Order filed.     On January 15, 2013, this court filed an order dismissing the instant appeal because of appellant’s failure to designate the record on appeal and for failure to file a Civil Case Information Statement, after notice that appellant was in default. On January 24, 2013, appellant filed a motion to reinstate the appeal. The motion is DENIED without prejudice. The motion is defective for the following reasons, among others: 1) The motion purports to include appellant’s notice designating the record on appeal but the notice is internally inconsistent in that appellant has failed to indicate which of the alternative methods she elects to use for the record on appeal. Instead, appellant has checked each of the three alternative forms: a clerk’s transcript under rule 8.122, an appendix under rule 8.124 and the original superior court file under rule 8.128. Much of the remainder of the document, which consists of handwritten notations, is illegible. 2) The motion purports to include appellant’s Case Information Statement, but the Case Information Statement is incomplete. Appellant has failed to complete section A regarding Appealability, section C regarding Bankruptcy or Other Stay, and section E regarding Service Requirements. 3) Appellant’s motion to reinstate the appeal does not contain a proper proof of service. The clerk of this court is directed to include with this order a copy of Judicial Council Form APP-009-INFO “Information Sheet for Proof of Service (Court of Appeal).” Specifically, appellant’s proof of service by mail on all court documents must include a statement, made under penalty of perjury, by the person doing the serving (who is not a party). Among other requirements, the proof of service also must state the name of the document being served, the server’s home or business address, and the city and state from which the document is being mailed. Appellant is advised that this dismissal will become final as to this court on February 14, 2013, at which time this court will lose the power to vacate, reconsider or modify it. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.264(b)(1).)
01/31/2013 Motion filed.     to reinstate the appeal (CCIS attached to the motion)
01/31/2013 To court.     Aplt.s’ motion to reinstate the appeal
01/31/2013 Filed letter from:     Dr. Taitz dated January 18, 2013. Letter deemed filed as of 1-18-2013 and entered on the docket sheet this date.
02/04/2013 Default notice vacated.     Appellant’s motion to vacate the dismissal, reinstate the appeal, and be relieved from default is GRANTED. The order of dismissal is VACATED and the appeal is REINSTATED. Orange County Superior Court, Appellate Division is directed to accept the designation of the record on appeal, provided the designation is presented within 10 days of the date of this order. If appellant fails to comply, and the Superior Court notifies this court of the non-compliance, the appeal may be dismissed. The clerk of this court is DIRECTED to file forthwith the civil case information statement attached to appellant’s motion to reinstate the appeal.
02/04/2013 Civil case information statement filed.
02/05/2013 Appellant ‘s notice designating record on appeal filed in trial court on:
02/05/2013 Appellant ‘s notice designating record on appeal filed in trial court on:     from superior court
02/06/2013 Proceeding by 8.124 – no reporter’s transcript.
02/06/2013 70 day letter sent (rule 8.124).
04/15/2013 Requested – extension of time Appellant’s appendix and opening brief filed. Requested for 04/30/2013 By 14 Day(s)
04/16/2013 Granted – extension of time. Appellant’s appendix and opening brief filed. Due on 04/30/2013 By 14 Day(s)
04/30/2013 Appellant’s appendix and opening brief filed. Plaintiff and Appellant: Orly Taitz
Pro Per     1 vol appendix
05/02/2013 Filed proof of service.     Amended proof of service for aao
05/02/2013 Certification of Interested Entities or Persons filed.     for aao
06/04/2013 Respondent notified re failure to file respondent’s brief.     As to all resps
06/21/2013 Received fax informational copy of:     By aplt, “RECEIVED ONLY” notice by aplt of appellees faiure to file appellees brief.
Rejected per court order of 06/25/13
06/24/2013 Original entry stricken – sequence no. not removed.     Notice by appellant of appellees failure to file appellees brief (original to faxed copy)
Stricken per court order of 06/25/13
06/25/2013 Case on ready list; no reply by respondent to notice re failure to file brief. Defendant and Respondent: Barack ObamaDefendant and Respondent: Elizabeth Emken

Defendant and Respondent: Diane Feinstein
06/25/2013 No brief filed by respondent after 8.220(a)(2) notice.
06/25/2013 Case fully briefed.
06/25/2013 Argument letter sent.
06/25/2013 Order filed.     On June 21, 2013, appellant submitted a faxed notice regarding respondents’ brief having not been filed and also included was a declaration of new facts that appellant believes will weigh in favor of granting her appeal. On June 24, 2013, appellant filed the original to the fax received on June 21, 2013. The clerk of this court is DIRECTED to reject the fax received June 21, 2013, and to strike the filing of the document filed June 24, 2013, and return forthwith both documents to appellant. The court is aware of the status of respondents’ briefs and the declaration of new facts is not part of the record on appeal.
07/01/2013 Request for oral argument filed by:     Aplt Orly Taitz in propria persona.
07/26/2013 Case briefed and on assignment panel.
08/12/2013 Calendar notice sent. Calendar date:     Thursday, 9-26-13 at 9:00 a.m.
08/30/2013 Order filed.     On the court’s own motion and for good cause, the matter previously calendared for September 26, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., is CONTINUED to the October 2013 oral argument calendar. Notice will be given of the new date and time.
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

6 Responses to “Update: No decisio0ns yet in 7 Obama cases. No new date for October in the 4th District. Waiting for DOJ to file a response in the case of Obama’s use of a stolen SSN of Harry Bounel and in the case of Obama using a fabricated stamp on his Selective Service certificate”

  1. Bruriah Sarah
    September 9th, 2013 @ 11:36 am

    Dr. Taitz

    As you probably realize, these delays are probably being orchestrated by the DOJ. I am just wondering if Issa could not help you out on this.

  2. BoPe
    September 9th, 2013 @ 3:47 pm

    IT HAS BEEN ALREADY TWO WEEKS FOR CRYING OUT LOUD.

    EVIL BASTARDS..

    SORRY I’M PISSED. I’M SURE EVERYONE ELSE IS AS WELL.

    I HOPE THE BIKERS DROWN OUT THE “ANTI INFIDELS” ALL DAY LONG NOW INSTEAD OF 3 HRS THEY WANTED WITH PERMITS NOW DENIED..

    NEXT TIME THE IDIOTS …I CHANGED MY MIND.. THEY WILL NEVER GET IT…

  3. Pelane
    September 9th, 2013 @ 9:08 pm

    The answer that you’re waiting on is the one you already have. Go back to Russia.

  4. Mariah Johnson
    September 10th, 2013 @ 12:47 am

    Too much pressure? People are commenting that he looks high in recent appearances.

    And here’s an interesting take on his odd behavior . . . . . Obama Has Got Passive-Aggressive Syria-Policy Personality Disorder

    https://www.whitehousedossier.com/2013/09/01/obama-passiveagressive-syria-policy-personality-disorder/

  5. Torrance
    September 10th, 2013 @ 9:15 am

    I don’t understand how or why you and Sheriff Arpaio have all of this damning information and NOBODY in Congress is doing anything to investiage Obama. What the heck is going on and why would anybody want this imposter in Office?

  6. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    September 10th, 2013 @ 9:18 am

    you need to go to the town hall meetings and confront members of Congress

Leave a Reply