Shocking manipulation of the docket in the 4th District to postpone Taitz v Obama et al case, which deals with Obama’s use of fabricated IDs and a stolen SSN, while all the other cases scheduled for the same day are being heard. There is a a great concern that there is pressure on the court from Obama administration to get rid of the case by postponing it, reassigning it to different judges, who are pro-Obama, and later dismissing it with some bogus excuse
Posted on | September 3, 2013 | 23 Comments
Press release by Attorney Orly Taitz
Suddenly, on my birthday (yet again, never fails), another road block was placed in front of me. My September 26 hearing in Taitz v Obama was postponed till October. No explanation was given aside from a short note that it was done
“On the court’s own motion and for good cause, the matter previously calendared for September 26, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., is CONTINUED to the October 2013 oral argument calendar. Notice will be given of the new date and time.”
Why would the court make its’ own motion in a case of National importance and postpone it? What good cause did they have?
Further, yet again a trick was played and I was removed from a notification list, I did not get an electronic notification from the court. I found out about it when Obama’s operatives started gloating, they are connected to the regime, so I checked the docket and so that the hearing was postponed.
I checked other cases: they were not postponed. A case scheduled right after mine: G047928 HFOP City Plaza v Brady, Vorwerck and Caspino was not postponed to October. So nothing happened to one of the three judges hearing the case. They will be there hearing all the other cases, 3 in the morning and 6 in the afternoon, so why was the first case on the docket postponed? You can see that this case G 047928 and other cases scheduled for that day are still on the docket.
|08/12/2013||Calendar notice sent. Calendar date:||Thursday, 9-26-13 at 9:00 a.m.|
Further, I called 415-865-7744 AOC, Administrative office of courts to find out why yet again I stopped receiving electronic notifications. I left a message with a clerk by name Jane Drew (or possible Yu) it was hard to hear the name. I did not get an answer. It is clear to me that there is a pressure on the Court of Appeal to kill this case by postponing it and later denying with some bogus excuse.
Public cannot influence the court in deciding which way to rule, however the public has a right to know why a case of National importance was postponed by the court without any explanation. Just posting with words “by courts own motion and for good cause” does not represent a coherent explanation.
I am asking my supporters to call AOC and demand to know why was I removed from the electronic docket notification and call the Chief Judge of the 4th District Court of Appeal, Kathleen O’Leary and seek an explanation why a case of national importance was postponed, while all the other cases are still on the docket.
Also, I suspect that in this court, as in all the other courts, as in all of the other media networks, there are employees who are working for the agencies, such as DHS, FBI and so on and they not only are spying on what the judges and attorneys are doing, they are also manipulating dockets, court transcripts (as it happened in Eastern district of PA when 14 pages were removed from the court transcript). I am afraid during the delay the case will be reassigned to another panel wit 3 pro-Obama judges, who will rule in his favor no matter what the law and the facts state. Do you remember Al Capone case? The last moment the jury was switched. I am wondering if there will be a switch for 3 pro Obama justices.
Please, call Chief Judge Kathleen O’Leary at 714-571-2600 and request an answer why a case of National importance dealing with use of fabricated IDs and a stolen Social security number by an individual occupying the position of the U.S. President was postponed while other cases with no ramifications to the Nation as a whole were kept on the docket. Further this case provided not only evidence of Obama’s use of fabricated IDs, it also provided a sworn declaration from a former relational analyst from NATO pointing to some one and a half million invalid voter registrations in CA.
Similarly Judge Hollander granted Department of Justice an extension of additional time till September 16 in regards to Obama’s use of a stolen Social Security number of Harrison Bounel. Taitz v Colvin 13-1878.
No answer from Judge Lamberth in Taitz v Astrue, no answer in Judd case or any other cases. More information on OrlyTaitzESQ.com. Attorney Taitz works on these cases pro bono, donations are appreciated, can be made via pay-pal on OrlyTaitzESQ.com or at the address:
Defend Our freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita Ca 92688
Kathleen E. O’Leary, Presiding Justice Print
Justice Kathleen E. O’Leary was appointed to the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, in December 1999. Her appointment was unanimously confirmed by the Commission on Judicial Appointments on January 21, 2000. In November 2002, Justice O’Leary was elected by the voters of the Fourth District (Imperial, Inyo, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and San Diego counties) to the same office.
In January 2006, Justice O’Leary received the Franklin G. West Award, the Orange County Bar Association’s highest honor. This award is presented each year to an outstanding attorney or judge whose lifetime achievements have advanced justice and the law.
Throughout her judicial career, Justice O’Leary has been active in judicial and law-related education efforts. She is a past member and past chair of the Governing Committee of the California Center for Judicial Education and Research (CJER). She has consistently worked to improve the administration of justice through comprehensive and quality education and training for judicial officers and other judicial branch personnel. In addition to teaching a number of courses for California judicial officers, judicial branch staff, law enforcement and lawyers, she has taught courses for the judiciary of sister states, the National Center for State Courts, and the National Judicial College. In 2003, Justice O’Leary was presented with the Bernard S. Jefferson Award for Distinguished Service in Judicial Education by the California Judges Association.
Justice O’Leary has served by appointment of the Chief Justice as a member of the Judicial Council of California, the constitutionally mandated body responsible for improving the administration of justice in California, on a number of its advisory committees, and on numerous Judicial Council task forces. Justice O’Leary’s contributions to judicial administration were recognized by the Judicial Council when she was named Jurist of the Year in 1999.
Prior to her appointment to the appellate court, Justice O’Leary served on the Orange County Superior Court. She was appointed to the Orange County Superior Court on July 1, 1986, by Governor George Deukmejian, and was in her third term as the Presiding Judge of that court when elevated to the Court of Appeal. Justice O’Leary began her judicial career at the West Orange County Municipal Court in 1981, where she also served both as the Presiding Judge and the Assistant Presiding Judge.
Justice O’Leary attended Marymount College at Loyola University, now Loyola Marymount University and received her juris doctorate degree from Southwestern University School of Law.
Justice O’Leary and her husband reside in Orange County.