Posted on | April 23, 2012 | 1 Comment
An open letter to a reader, answers regaring Larry Kleyman, WND and ORYR
On February 10 there was a written solicitation to raise $25,000 for attorney Larry Kleyman and there was a written announcement that within a week, which would be by February 17, Kleyman is filing legal actions in FL and CA.
A couple of weeks later I wrote a truthful statement that Kleyman did not file any law suits.
Only about a month after he was supposed to file 2 law suits, and after I wrote my article, he finally substituted one plaintiff in one pro se law suit in FL, that’s it. Nothing was done in CA.
Recently Kleyman issued a statement, claiming that he is in discovery, saying that he is doing depositions, interrogatories, subpoenas.
It was a lie second time around. In order to be in discovery and have a right to do depositions, interrogatories and subpoenas, you need to have either a ruling from a judge, saying that a motion to dismiss by the defendants is denied and then you go into discovery or you need to have an actual answer from the defendants, not a motion to dismiss a case as one without merit, but an answer.
Again, I posted a printout from the docket of the only eligibility case, where Kleyman took over and it showed that he is not telling the truth. There was no answer filed in his case, there wasn’t even a motion to dismiss filed, there wasn’t even a proof of service of the defendants with his complaint. So he was simply outright lying to supporters, asking for money and saying that he is in discovery and doing depositions and interrogatories, when it was simply not true.
Correct me, if I am wrong, but out of over a 100 law suits filed by different attorneys and pro se plaintiffs, right now I am the only plaintiff and attorney-pro se in MS, who has an actual answer filed by the defendants and who can do discovery. As far as I know, there isn’t any other case around the country with discovery.
If there is any other ObamaForgeryGate case, where there is currently an order by a judge to deny a motion to dismiss by the defendants or alternatively, where the defendants filed an actual answer and the parties are in discovery, please send me that order by the judge or those answers from the defendants. I would like to see them.
Similarly, I never got any explanation, why WND and ORYR, who are pushed up by the establishment search engines, never published a truthful statement that though Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo held a press conference 53 days ago, they never filed any report with the District Attorney and never agreed to testify in court. Without those actions, there is very little value in their press conference, as it is not on the record, not under penalty of perjury. WND and ORYR never provided any explanation, why they never published a word about the fact that in my case in MS an answer was filed by both defendants: Secretary of
State and the Democratic party of Mississippi, which gives a right to discovery, and they never published a word about the fact that I filed an amended complaint with several RICO (racketeering) causes of action against Obama, Obama for America, Pelosi, Fuddy, Onaka and others.
Keep in mind: every dictatorial regime has controlled opposition as means of control of the population. For example FOX, Newsmax, GOP represent controlled opposition to Obama. They are controlled and are speaking only on issues and areas, where they are allowed to open their mouth and speak.
When groups of population become disillusioned in controlled opposition, tune out and seek true leaders, regime finds new outlets of controlled opposition. Those new channels appear to be free, but if you look closely you can see that they are controlled as well.
I noticed that WND (run by Joseph Farah and Jerome Corsi) and ORYR (the owner does not confirm his real name, it is told to be either Bob Nelson or Richard Garruth, I do not know for sure), two web sites that seem to be pushed up in searches by the search engines, which are rumored to be controlled as well, are heavily promoting Arpaio, but do not demand an explanation from Arpaio, why he is not filing an official report with the District Attorney, when the time is of the essence and it might be too late already to file a report and expect the District Attorney to file a complaint and the judge to rule on the case before the election. Why they are not demanding an explanation from Sheriff Arpaio and Mike Zullo, as to why they are not willing to testify in court about their findings. It is a complete nonsense, for Arpaio or Zullo to say that it is too burdensome for them to appear in court or that because of an ongoing investigation they can’t confirm in court what they already said in the press conference.
There is no reasonable explanation, why WND and ORYR are not providing the public with the truthful information that there is 1 case around the country, where the defendants filed an answer and the Plaintiffs can do discovery, why they are not reporting on the RICO complaint which is the most explosive.
It is a legitimate question to ask, are they part of the controlled opposition?
, Help Needed
, HOT ITEMS!
, Latest News
, Legal Actions
, Letters from Readers and Patriots
, Letters/Feedback from Readers
, Obama Fraud Gate
, orly taitz attorney
, Orly Taitz civil rights leader
, Orly Taitz doctor and attorney
, Orly Taitz for U.S. Senate 2012
, Orly Taitz Obama birth certificate
, Orly Taitz ObamaFraudGate
, Orly Taitz subpoena
, Other Criminal or Suspicious Activities
, Supporting Documentation