Draft of the FOIA request to the Department of Justice
Posted on | June 13, 2013 | 9 Comments
DEFEND OUR FREEDOMS FOUNDATION
DR. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ
29839 SANTA MARGARITA, STE 100
RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA, CA 92688
PH 949-683-5411 FAX 949-766-7603
Attention
FOIA/PA Mail Referral Unit
Department of Justice
Room 115
LOC Building
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(301) 583-7354
(301) 341-0772 fax
06.13.2013
1. Petitioner Attorney Orly Taitz requests under freedom of information act 5 U.S.C. 552 any and all documents, showing how did the U.S. Attorneys’ office/Department of Justice obtain bank account information of civil rights attorney Orly Taitz.
Attorney Orly Taitz(Hereinafter Taitz) is a Civil Rights Attorney, and she represented pro bono a number of plaintiffs, among them members of the U.S. military seeking production of the original IDs of Barack Obama in light of the fact that sworn affidavits of licensed investigators showed his IDs to be flagrant forgeries and Social Security used by him to be fraudulently obtained. One of such cases was Rhodes v MacDonald 4:09-CV-106 Middle District of GA.
Federal Judge Clay D. Land attempted to intimidate Attorney Taitz and send a message to other attorneys not to question Obama’s forgeries by assessing sanctions against Taitz.
Without any evidentiary hearing and any motion to produce bank information, US Attorneys’ office/Department of Justice contacted two banks where Taitz banked and advised them that she owes money to USA and the accounts can be liened. As a result Taitz was embarrassed in front of employees of two banks, where she banked. Her credit rating went down immediately and her credit line was cut by about 70% immediately. At the same time the Department of Justice advised Taitz that if she does not pay $20,000 immediately, Department of Justice will place a lien on her house and will sell her house to cover the lien.
Under FOIA 5 USC 552 Taitz demands any and all documents showing where did the Department of Justice/U.S. Attorneys’ office obtain her bank account information.
2. In May of 2009 Attorney Taitz filed a Quo Warranto requests with the Attorney General Eric Holder (see attached). For a period of four years she did not receive any response. Taitz is seeking any and all documentation generated in response to her Quo Warranto request.
3. In the beginning of 2011 Attorney Taitz reported to the US Attorneys’ office that Court Reporter for the Eastern District of PA, US District Court and for the Eastern District of PA and Third Circuit Court of Appeals that Court Reporter for the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of PA, Dona Anders, falsified an official court transcript and removed 14 pages out of a certified court transcript of a motion hearing held on 12.20.2010 before Judge Eduardo Robreno. Anders removed the whole cross examination of a party done by Attorney Taitz. When Anders was confronted by Taitz with a demand for explanation, she tried to claim that pages were missing due to scanner problems. The explanation was not valid, as with scanner problems one would see one or two pages missing and would see a word or a sentence being cut, incomplete at the end of the page. In the case of the falsification of the transcript by Anders, she has done it intentionally, as she neatly arranged the examination of the next witness in the middle of the page right after the direct examination of the prior witness, as if cross examination was never done. Such forgery/falsification of the court transcript benefitted an opposing attorney Berg, as in the cross examination a party to the action admitted that the allegations made in the case, were not made by her but were made up in the law office of Attorney Berg.
Taitz did not receive any response since the beginning of 2011, for two and a half years. If Anders could falsify the transcript in Taitz case, she could do it in other cases and cause immeasurable damage to numerous innocent individuals.
Taitz hereby requests any and all documentation showing any and all actions taken in response to her complaint.
Specifically, Taitz is seeking information, whether
a. Anders is still employed as a court reporter in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
b. Any and all documentation of an investigation of the matter and any and all discipline
c. Any and all documentation showing, whether the matter was forwarded to the criminal department for criminal prosecution
d. Any and all information, whether Ander was ordered or told by any high ranking official to falsify the official court transcript
e. Any and all information, whether Anders received any incentive, any compensation for falsification of the official court transcript.
4. In December 2013 U.S. Attorneys’ office made an appearance in case Grinols et al v Electoral college, U.S. Congress et al 12-cv-02997 US District Court for the Eastern District of California and stated to the presiding judge Hon Morrison C. England that the U.S. Attorneys’ Office /Department of Justice represents the U.S. Congress and seeks to oppose the emergency injunction and seeks to dismiss the case. The main portion of the case dealt with evidence of Barack Obama used a stolen/fraudulently obtained CT Social Security number 042-68-4425 of Harrison J. Bounel, born in 1890 and presumed to be deceased and used forged birth certificate and Selective Service certificate as a basis of his identity and eligibility to the U.S. Presidency. Plaintiffs sought injunctive and declaratory relief
Later in March of 2013 Attorney Taitz, who represented the Plaintiffs travelled to Washington DC and attended the CPAC convention, where multiple members of the U.S. Congress advised her that the Department of Justice did not notify them that they are being represented in this case, did not forward to them any pleadings and documentation and it appears that the Department of Justice went behind the back of the members of the U.S. Congress and defrauded them and defrauded the court by seeking to dismiss the case on behalf of the U.S. Congress.
Petitioner Taitz is seeking under FOIA 5USC 552 any and all documentation showing that U.S. Attorneys for the Eastern District of California, Benjamin Wagner and Ed Olsen or Attorney General Holder or any other employee of the Department of Justice advised members of the U.S. Congress about the representation in this case and forwarded to the members of the U.S. Congress the pleadings and documents submitted in this case on their behalf.
Petitioner Taitz is requesting a response within a customary 20 day period for FOIA return
/s/ Orly Taitz, ESQ
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
Comments
9 Responses to “Draft of the FOIA request to the Department of Justice”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

June 13th, 2013 @ 7:21 pm
Remember Orly, the man in the hot seat said “it’s my justice dept.” What do you expect??
June 14th, 2013 @ 12:18 am
“We the Politicians of the Democrat-Republican Party, in Order to destroy the Union, establish Injustice, insure domestic Planned Parenthood Violence, provide for our common national surrender to Islam and Communists, buy votes and control the people through individual Welfare Entitlements, and erase the Blessings of Liberty for ourselves and our Posterity via abortion, the homosexual agenda, and the creation of debt that we cannot possibly repay, do disdain and disestablish this Constitution of the United States of America.”
June 14th, 2013 @ 4:03 am
You go girl! Maybe you need to send a copy of this request to the NSA program also. I’am sure they could find something in the past phone records of the courts that would be helpful.
God Bless,
Kathy F.
June 14th, 2013 @ 4:28 am
Our government is a carnival freak show.
June 14th, 2013 @ 4:44 am
Typical tactics of the Chicago Mafia !
June 14th, 2013 @ 8:45 am
Dr. Taitz
I am wondering if there are any court rules which say that the tampering with evidence or due process is criminal. And if it is criminal, then perhaps this can be tried in criminal court. I am not sure how that would be proceed because the DOJ’s Holder can influence that court as well. However, if the case is well crafted (which I am sure that you do) perhaps they would have to consider the evidence based on its merits.
June 14th, 2013 @ 9:26 pm
4. In December 2013 U.S. Attorneys’ office made an appearance
Orly, should this read December 2012?
Good luck on this request!
June 14th, 2013 @ 9:34 pm
typo
June 16th, 2013 @ 10:35 pm
@ Holder: com’on, boy, let’s get that muslim gray matter working! Have you not been in America long enough to understand English?
That’s quite shoddy workmanship, for an attorney! I think you’re supposed to follow the Constitution, in being in charge of the laws of AMERICA…and not what you want and not make up your own laws/rules!!!
Do your freakin’ job, son! Or maybe we’ll have to FIRE YOUR BUTT!!!! This isn’t a muslim nation…so get that “mecca-mind” in gear! You owe Dr Orly one hell of a speedy response!!!