If Zullo has a statement from a forensic document examiner, he should make it public. what is he waiting for? why is he making a deal for the examiner not to make public his report?
Posted on | June 9, 2013 | 11 Comments
Mike Zullo says that he has a report from a forensic document examiner stating that Obama’s BC is a 100% forgery, he needs to make this report public. Every day of Obama regime causes an immeasurable damage to this nation.
You might remember an article stating that some records were found in England. This article went around for a year and no records were ever produced.
Now, I am not saying that Zullo does not have a report, I believe he does have it, but he needs to make it public and he needs to resolve some concerns.
These are the concerns that need to be resolved:
1. I contacted multiple forensic document examiners. They all told me that they cannot sign an opinion that the copy produced for public consumption is a forgery without seeing the original document on file, and Hawaii refuses to release the original (wet ink) document, even after I served them with a federal subpoena. Zullo never had any subpoenas and he never saw the original document, so I am extremely surprised that the Forensic Document Examiner agreed to sign an opinion that the document is a forgery without actually seeing the original document on file. I am not saying he didn’t, but we need to see it, we need to see what did he actually write.
2. I received an e-mail from P.B. and she questioned Zullo’s and Arpaio’s statement that the opinion was provided by an examiner, who is a registered Democrat in Hawaii. According to research by Ms. Barnett HI does not post a party affiliation of the voter. Maybe it is some kind of a minor error, I do not know, but it would be nice to get an explanation, where did they get information that he is a registered Democrat in Hawaii.
3. Why did Mike Zullo submit to the Supreme Court in AL a hearsay, a statement that he has an opinion of someone? Of course the Supreme Court will not take into account Zullo’s affidavit any way, as they will not review new evidence and there was no affidavit from Zullo in the lower court, but even if this would be submitted to the lower court, they would ask for the actual report from the examiner, Zullo’s affidavit would be opposed and probably stricken as a hearsay.
4. Why did this examiner, Reed Hayes, state in his e-mail, which I published here a day ago, that he made a deal with Zullo not to work with anyone else? Several Secretaries of State, including AZ and KS sought verification from HI. If there is a report from a forensic document examiner that it is a 100% forgery, then Zullo and Arpaio have a duty to make it public and forward to all 50 secretaries of State and all 50 AGs and their own District Attorney, and US Attorney.
We need to get answers and we need to see this report.
Comments
11 Responses to “If Zullo has a statement from a forensic document examiner, he should make it public. what is he waiting for? why is he making a deal for the examiner not to make public his report?”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
June 9th, 2013 @ 3:25 pm
I think the recent WARRANT-LESS MEDIA SWAT TEAM RAID over Arpaio and Zullo’s Investigation Story that they broke 2 days ago has some “GUNPOINT INTIMIDATION” behind it… to hide the EVIDENCE with armed force….
The SWAT TEAM RAID AT GIBSON GUITARS… was also “a show of armed force” to a Tea Party Campaign Contributer…
Clearly, they are intimidating the opposition and the Media, and Arpaio and Zullo… and “BRANDISHING WEAPONS” to do it. Obama and his WARRANT-LESS SWAT TEAM HENCHMEN should be arrested for that…
Send in Special Forces to lock them up!
June 9th, 2013 @ 3:26 pm
You seem to keep holding out hope that Arpaio and Zullo are going to do something helpful.
Just forget it because it’s NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!
They aren’t trustworthy. They’re out for themselves. They’re just grifters out to make a buck. They’re not patriots — they’re the opposite.
June 9th, 2013 @ 3:28 pm
You think the Zullo homer Carl Gallups could ask him? Since those interviews are Pre-Scripted I highly doubt it. Zullo just faxes Carl a list of canned questions beforehand.
June 9th, 2013 @ 3:49 pm
Why aren’t the taxpayers of Maricopa County demanding the info? It’s theirs. They paid for it.
June 9th, 2013 @ 5:25 pm
Whistleblower has all info. More info coming. Hope he exposes all the “important” documents.
June 9th, 2013 @ 5:36 pm
I personally think all these (redacted) have been intimidated by Obama and his Black Panthers. They probably threatened to start major race riots if Obama is outed. 300 million firearms in the hands of 100 million decent Americans of all races would take care of that threat. Can you spell targets of opportunity?
June 9th, 2013 @ 8:08 pm
Releasing the info would spoil sales of Zullo’s book.
June 9th, 2013 @ 9:21 pm
1. “Forensic document examiners all told you that they cannot sign an opinion that the copy produced for public consumption is a forgery without seeing the original document”.
This would be formally true if the examiners answered the question whether the copy is identical to the original. However in this particular situation the examiners must answer a different and more simple question:
DID THE WHITE HOUSE PRODUCE A PDF COPY WHICH LOOKS AS A VALID LEGAL DOCUMENT?
Indeed, the answer is resounding: No. Can a legal copy qualify the father as Martian? Or as “African” while in 1961 the official term was “Negro”. That is not to mention tens of other inconsistencies found by experts in that pdf file.
June 10th, 2013 @ 2:27 am
Alex, many document experts have already declared the BC Soebarkah placed online a blatant phony. In fact, every expert that Arpaio and Zullo used to inspect it came to the same conclusion. As Arpaio stated a 100% pure bonified forgery, which means not even 1 would consider it authentic!!
June 10th, 2013 @ 7:44 pm
https://www.facebook.com/chiefkessler
“Chief Mark Kessler
about an hour ago
here’s what I was told, VIA cold case possie , 1) bozo isn’t American nor was he born in Hawaii, 2) they believe he’s Saudi , 3) their not his real parents, 4) Russia is involved, 5) it wasn’t an accident he’s president, 6) bill ayers and the weather underground are involved, 7) Kenya played a roll, Hawaii state officials did the birth certificate, he has several other names , not just the ones the public knows about, 9) he don’t exsist in the usa until the age of 5…..10) WERE ALL FUCKED”
June 10th, 2013 @ 8:14 pm
when should I stop holding my breath?