Now media is realizing that what I’ve been saying for 5 years now, is true and correct. The most pro-Obama Daily Beast is likening Obama regime to NAZI Germany
Posted on | May 21, 2013 | 4 Comments
First They Came for Fox News
Much of the Fourth Estate shrugged when the Obama administration attacked Fox News, writes Kirsten Powers. But now itβs coming for them, too.
The Daily Beast (RSS)
Comments
4 Responses to “Now media is realizing that what I’ve been saying for 5 years now, is true and correct. The most pro-Obama Daily Beast is likening Obama regime to NAZI Germany”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

May 21st, 2013 @ 9:03 am
Sorry but I have no sympathy for Fox News. Sleep with dogs and you get flees.For years Fox has been covering up the truth about Obama’s eligibility… or should I say ineligibility. Will they have the guts now to tell the truth about Obama? I doubt it.
May 21st, 2013 @ 12:30 pm
Corpsman Obama’s SchutzSstaffel (SS):
DOJ/SS
IRS/SS
DHS/SS
FBI/SS
DNC/SS
EPA/SS
Obama gave his marching orders when he denegrated the “bitter enders’ ,those groups that hang onto their
guns and Bibles, His SS-Gestopo obots knew what he wanted done and they did it.
Everyone knows Sargent Schultz:
I see notheeeeng
I hear notheeeeeng
I know notheeeeeng
Now we have Corpsman Obama:
I see nottin
I hear nottin
I know nottin
Now go after those gun and Bible crazies!
MLK:Judge people by the “content of their character’
Obama SS Obots:Judge people by the “content of their prayers”
May 21st, 2013 @ 1:05 pm
Bill O’Reilly speaks about Obama’s birth certificate like he was the doctor who signed it. And for all the computer experts out there who have debunked his copy of his copy of his bogus live certificate of birth that can be filed when not born here. The whole Fox crew didn’t want to attack Obama for all of his inconsistencies.
May 24th, 2013 @ 2:36 pm
This is on a website called MEMRI:
It shows how the Arab world is not
deceived by Obama.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
David Ignatius, who recently wrote a critique of the Obama administration’s policy that was not confined to foreign [policy] affairs… Summarizing the problematic aspects of Obama’s conduct, he said that the public is more afraid of a weak administration than a strong one!
“We are not talking [only] about harsh critics of this administration, inside or outside the U.S. This is apparent from a recent article by Lebanese-American writer Fuad ‘Ajami, who slammed Obama for his feebleness, his lack of leadership, and his inability to take bold decisions under difficult circumstances, especially when it comes to his position on the Syrian catastrophe. Nor is it only Republicans who attack [Obama].
[Criticism is also voiced] by people who were overjoyed by the arrival [in the White House] of a black Harvard graduate with African and Islamic roots, the son of Hussein Obama. [They expected him] to have a better understanding of the Islamic and Arab societies and their nature. But eventually, as the helplessness of the international community [to address the situation] in Syria increased due to the [conduct of] the U.S. and Obama, it became apparent that this man is unable to lead and that he hides his failure and ignorance behind a lot of hypothetical talk about red, green and purple lines…”
Obama Is Responsible For Exacerbating The Syrian Crisis
“Perhaps he is sincere in his belief in democracy and has [genuine] sympathy for other nations, especially those of Asia and Africa, [and perhaps he really believes that] America’s problems in the world can be eliminated by improving its image and expressing appreciation for other cultures. Perhaps he really feels that way, but feelings are one thing and reality is another. I wish matters could be resolved through good intentions [alone]…
“Evidence of Obama’s narrow approach to the Syrian crisis can be found in statements he made to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in their meeting several days ago. [He said that] there was no ‘magic solution’ to the escalating Syrian crisis and that a realistic solution was needed, [namely] a non-ideal political solution.
[But Obama] is the one who complicated the Syrian problem and caused the wound to grow deeper, the bloodshed [to continue]… the voices to grow louder and the thugs to interfere, from Hassan Nasrallah’s militia… to the young men who come from all over [the world] to fight jihad in [the ranks of the Al-Qaeda-affiliated organization] Jabhat Al-Nusra.
“[Obama] is responsible for the fact that Syria has reached this level of confusion and loss. Were it not for his hesitancy, his weak approach, his lack of determination and his eagerness to [gain] popularity on Twitter… the Russian ‘Snow Emperor’ Vladimir Putin wouldn’t have dreamt of attaining the role [he has attained], with the Western world ready to charge him with the task of solving the Syrian problem. [Were it not for Obama’s weakness,] Bashar Al-Assad would not have said in a recent interview with the Argentinean paper [Clarin] that he felt he was beginning to overcome the intense pressures that have been exerted upon him.
[Moreover,] Iran’s arrogance and contempt wouldn’t have grown to the point of making a public announcement that the war in Syria is its own war and [to the point of] ordering its [operations] officer in Lebanon, Hassan Nasrallah, to declare war and launch resistance [actions] β not on the Israeli border but against the Syrians in Al-Qusair, which has been besieged by Assad’s shabiha[5] and by Nasrallah’s fighters for a while, right in front of Obama!
“The U.S. is currently living under one of the weakest leaders in its [history]… while Russia has a firm and determined leader. This becomes even sadder when you realize that the U.S. is believed to be supporting the Syrian rebels while Russia [is considered] a supporter of the [Syrian] regime. In this situation, the alliance [between the U.S. and the rebels] is a liability more than an asset…
“The most acute [aspect of] the problem is that Obama is laying down the systematic groundwork for the development of extremism and sectarian violence that will make us miss the Al-Qaeda of George W. Bush’s era, while deluding himself that he eliminated Al-Qaeda when he killed Osama bin Laden!”
Iraq, Syria, Lebanon And Perhaps Also Turkey Face “Great Danger” Because Of Obama’s “Policy Of Wholesale Retreat”
“There is great danger in what is happening in Iraq, Syria and Lebanon and may soon also happen on Turkey’s southern border because of the policy of wholesale retreat that Obama is employing without any deep consideration. These countries β and probably also Egypt and North Africa, in a different way β are about to enter a terrifying era of religious terrorism, sectarian war and civil strife that will harm everyone. The Al-Qaeda attacks of the recent years pale beside what might happen in the future and what is already happening: [the fighting] in Homs and its rural area, the attacks on mosques and Husseiniyyas [Shi’ite cultural and religious centers] in Iraq, and [the attacks of] the Turkish ‘Alawite fighters [of the Popular Front for the Liberation of] Alexandretta,[6] who are coming to the aid of the ‘Alawites in Syria.
Al-Qaeda’s former attacks were high-quality and were carried out be elite squads of fighters, [but these fighters] did not represent broad sectors of Arab society. The wars currently being waged in Syria, Lebanon and Iraq, on the other hand, are frightening because they rely on [entire] social [sectors] that support [the fighters] and shelter them.
“This leads us to a frustrating conclusion about Obama’s precise and rigid implementation of his bad and superficial policy of retreating [from the Middle East] at any cost, even in the face of new developments. [We must conclude that] this is not a skilled statesman and politician with creative solutions, but an ordinary academic who repeats meaningless slogans and does not possess the political sensitivity to give each factor the weight it deserves, to take bold [action] when necessary and to refrain [from action] when necessary…”
Endnotes:
[1] Al-Yawm (Saudi Arabia), May 8, 2013.
[2] Al-Riyadh (Saudi Arabia), May 12, 2013.
[3] Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), May 18, 2013.
[4] Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), May 21, 2013.
[5] The popular name given to the Syrian regime’s plainclothes militia, which is assisting the regime security forces in suppressing the uprising.
[6] An organization established in 2012 by pro-Assad Syrians on the Turkish border. Its stated goal is the liberation of Alexandretta from the rule of Turkey, which is now among the countries opposed to Assad’s regime. Assad’s opponents claim that the members of the organization are ‘Alawites.