OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

I was absolutely correct. Affidavit of Mike Zullo was attached as an exhibit to the motion to strike the Amicus Curiae brief of AL Dem Party, it is not a part of the underlying case or Appelant’s brief or a reply to the brief by the Appellee, Secretary of State

Posted on | May 15, 2013 | 2 Comments

Please, see for yourselves: Mike Zullo’s affidavit is only an exhibit to the motion to strike the Amicus Curiae (friend of the court) brief by the Democratic Party of AL. I was correct in what I was saying.

This affidavit by Mike Zullo is not a part of the case in the lower court, it is not an exhibit to the Appellate Brief or a reply to the Appellate Brief. Most courts of Appeals or higher courts disregard most of the Amices Curiae, they have absolutely no duty to even look at them. For example Lucas Smith filed a Amicus Cuiae in this case, nobody even bothers to respond to it. So, if  the Supreme Court of Alabama decides to simply disregard this Amicus Curiae by the Dem party or strike it from the record, they will also disregard the motion asking to disregard it and an exhibit, affidavit of Mike Zullo,  attached to it.

The Supreme Court of AL has a duty to look only at the lower court case, what was filed there, Appellant’s brief, Appellee’s brief and the reply by the Appellant. Affidavit by Mike Zullo is not a part of any of these documents and cannot be considered and will be disregarded by the court just as an exhibit filed by the Alabama Democratic party will be disregarded, as those are new exhibits filed after the case was dismissed in the lower court. The Supreme court, which is reviewing the appeal,  needs to rule based on the evidence that existed in front of the judge which reviewed the case in the lower court, to see if this judge made an error. I hope they rule for the plaintiffs/Appellants, however Mike Zullo’s affidavit will have no bearing on this decision.  We do not know how the court will rule. I do not know how long does it take for this court  to come up with a decision. (can someone check how long does it take for the Supreme Court to rule on average?) In the 9th Circuit it took the court nearly a year from the time it was filed to come to the decision. I filed my case in Judge Carter’s court On January 21, 2009. Decision by the 9th circuit came sometime in the end of 2011.

As I stated that even if the court rules in favor of the plaintiffs and reverses the decision of the lower court, still there is the same problem. Plaintiffs asked for the certified copy of the birth certificate. Look up what the Dem party of MS  did in my case in MS: they provided the court with a certified copy of another copy of the same forgery. By the way in MS they made some changes to this forgery according to sworn affidavits. So, what do you do then? The obots will say: you wanted a certified copy, here you go, here is the certified copy. Obama will declare this as yet another victory. He will state: they asked for the certified copy, they got the certified copy, case closed.

For that reason for the hundred and first time I am explaining that Sheriff Arpaio and Mike Zullo need to do their job. Arpaio needs to file a criminal complaint in his county, where he is a sheriff, in Maricopa County, AZ, he needs to  file a signed, stamped complaint with the District Attorney and Attorney General. He needs to go to the judge on duty and seek a subpoena for production of the original (wet ink) birth certificate , original Selective Service registration and  original SS-5  for the CT SSN Obama is using. Either Sheriff or District attorney can appear before a judge in HI and in DC and seek a reciprocal local subpoena based on a subpoena issued by the judge in the sister jurisdiction in AZ. When they have the local subpoenas, they need to bring the document experts and compare Obama’s originals (if they exist) to the other similar documents from the same time period, which are kept on file. With the reports of the experts the District Attorney or Attorney General of the state can file a criminal complaint in court. That’s what needs to be done now, immediately. Please, call Arpaio and tell him that he needs to do his job as a duly elected sheriff and file the proper criminal complaint with his District Attorney and Attorney General, not wait another half a year or a year for the Supreme court of Alabama to rule and in the best case scenario  get another certified copy of the same forgery as they already filed in Taitz et al v Democratic Party of MS, Obama, Astrue, Onaka (this case is still going on, no decision from the District court yet). Tell Arpaio to file the criminal complaint ASAP!!!

Category: Help Needed, HOT ITEMS!, Important Contacts, Orly Taitz ObamaFraudGate, Supporting Documentation

Comments

2 Responses to “I was absolutely correct. Affidavit of Mike Zullo was attached as an exhibit to the motion to strike the Amicus Curiae brief of AL Dem Party, it is not a part of the underlying case or Appelant’s brief or a reply to the brief by the Appellee, Secretary of State”

  1. Itchik
    May 15th, 2013 @ 7:36 pm

    I received another solicitation for donations today from Arapio, in spite of unsubscribing from his list twice already. I sent him a reply, laced with vulgarity, demanding he file a criminal complaint against Obama or he will not get a dime from me. I also told him he deserves to be recalled if he fails to file the complaint. Screw him!

  2. Elizabeth
    May 16th, 2013 @ 5:49 am

    https://www.exposeobama.com/

    This web site has the complete
    document; it is very long and
    easy to follow/read.

Leave a Reply