OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

It looks like judge England did not issue the final order to dismiss the Grinols case and there is no transcript from the clerk either. I am still waiting for the transcript. the 9th circuit states that they do not have jurisdiction as there is not final order to dismiss by judge England

Posted on | May 15, 2013 | 12 Comments

13-15627 James Grinols, et al v. Electoral College, et al “Clerk Order Filed”

Inbox
 x
ca9_ecfnoticing@ca9.uscourts.gov
10:22 AM (10 minutes ago)
to me

***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing.

 

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Notice of Docket Activity

The following transaction was entered on 05/15/2013 at 10:22:08 AM PDT and filed on 05/15/2013

Case Name: James Grinols, et al v. Electoral College, et al
Case Number:   13-15627
Document(s): Document(s)

Docket Text:
Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SLJ): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because an order denying a motion for default judgment is not a final appealable order. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Bird v. Reese, 875 F.2d 256 (9th Cir. 1989) (order). Moreover, a review of the district court docket shows that a final order granting appellees’ motions to dismiss has not yet been filed. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [8629706] (WL)

Notice will be electronically mailed to:

Mr. Edward Alan Olsen, Assistant U.S. Attorney
Doctor Orly Taitz, Counsel
George Michael Waters

The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Document Description: Main Document
Original Filename: 13-15627.pdf
Electronic Document Stamp:
[STAMP acecfStamp_ID=1106763461 [Date=05/15/2013] [FileNumber=8629706-0] [14d9b6473645e071011c4929b66ea4cd6a7ffc5a488abd9b2bfe7b62662553f4ce04ceda47f9ce04622488302896d6fe33ae83ac0e5ac3e960c06d2bf0ba2ee0]]

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

12 Responses to “It looks like judge England did not issue the final order to dismiss the Grinols case and there is no transcript from the clerk either. I am still waiting for the transcript. the 9th circuit states that they do not have jurisdiction as there is not final order to dismiss by judge England”

  1. blackyb
    May 15th, 2013 @ 9:48 am

    It seems someone is using their office to impede Justice. Is there a time they have to either poop or get off the pot, so to speak?

    Delay is a tactic and is illegal if done to deny justice.

  2. blackyb
    May 15th, 2013 @ 9:50 am

    I guess I am stating the obvious.

  3. Indy Hoopster
    May 15th, 2013 @ 10:01 am

    Seems to me he is waiting if Obama’s “house of cards” starts to fall down, then he will react accordingly. He and others are incriminating themselves as they abet and aid Obama(or whoever the hell his name is) and will be judged by the ULTIMATE JUDGE- GOD- when that time comes..

  4. Stephen huffman
    May 15th, 2013 @ 10:22 am

    Does this equate to the judge just buying more time for Obama?

  5. john
    May 15th, 2013 @ 10:27 am

    I had the e-mail of the court reporter of my cases transcribe mine ( but costly ) and many times nowadays , Orly , CD’s are also obtained through the Open Records laws . Can we as a taxpayer get them for you ?

  6. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    May 15th, 2013 @ 10:56 am

    I don’t know, what is going on, why he is not issuing the final order, I don;t know what he is waiting for. Maybe he got second thoughts? Maybe conscience woke u? I hope so. I would be happy to lose $450 and voluntarily withdraw my appeal if England reconsiders and does not dismiss my case

  7. BOPE
    May 15th, 2013 @ 11:42 am

    Judge England reminds me of two biblical figures rolled into one..

    Pharoah & Herod..

    Their hearts were constrained even though they heard the truth..

    He really needs to have third thoughts..

    He really needs to have many more thoughts..many thoughts are needed for him to put his signature of fidiciary responsibility down on paper that will judge him in the end..

    Let’s see what the person in the black robe will do..

  8. Freedom First
    May 15th, 2013 @ 11:44 am

    Does Judge England maintain plausible deniability in being complicit in the fraud if he doesn’t make an official judgement?

  9. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    May 15th, 2013 @ 11:47 am

    I don’t know

  10. Tim McGuire
    May 17th, 2013 @ 5:29 am

    Judge England, aka Obama’s waterboy judge, needs to complete the rest of his despicable judicial work and file the Order of Dismissal. How much more judicial incompetence, partiality, unfairness, and cowardice can one judge display in a single case?

  11. Bruriah Sarah
    May 17th, 2013 @ 10:13 am

    Dr. Taitz

    Could it be that Judge England is trying to protect his own reputation by not dismissing the case? If he is only trying to protect the administration, he would have dismissed it. But there is more to it. And then what are the ramifications of not having the case dismissed? Can you file again asking for an answer? I am not sure how that is done in court.

Leave a Reply