Congressmen are not responding to citizens due to litigation. Judge England refused to allow testimony even to show that the members of Congress were kept in the dark about the case by the Department of Justice
Posted on | April 19, 2013 | 21 Comments
From: Ana Ellis <Ana.Ellis@mail.house.gov>
To: ‘Olszewski
Sent: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 17:09:55 -0000 (UTC)
Subject: Your Scheduling Request
Art,
I hope you are doing well. I wanted to get back to you regarding your scheduling request.
Because this matter involves ongoing litigation for which Rep. Rothfus has received a subpoena, and after speaking with counsel, we have decided that neither the Congressman nor his staff
should meet with you regarding these issues, at least as long as the litigation remains ongoing. You are welcome to put in writing any information that you would like our office to review.
Thank you for your understanding.
Ana
Ana D. Ellis
Executive Assistant
Representative Keith Rothfus
Pennsylvania’s Twelfth District
503 Cannon HOB | Washington, D.C. 20515
Office: 202/225-2065 Fax: 202/225-5709
Comments
21 Responses to “Congressmen are not responding to citizens due to litigation. Judge England refused to allow testimony even to show that the members of Congress were kept in the dark about the case by the Department of Justice”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
April 19th, 2013 @ 12:13 pm
“Judge England refused to allow testimony even to show that the members of Congress were kept the dark about the case by the Department of Justice”
What does this mean? When did the Judge say this? What reason was given for the refusal?
Are all the judges, law clerks, politicians on the take, or were threatened?
April 19th, 2013 @ 12:28 pm
If I was presiding over this case I would be allowing any and all testimony relevant to exposing the truth so I could get the full story in order to make an informed decision. England isn’t doing that. He is excluding as much as possible which tells us he’s in on the cover up.
April 19th, 2013 @ 12:36 pm
Why would a Judge not allow testimony unless is is scared to death what that testimony might be/proved. I thought a court was suppose to be an open forum where both sides present their evidence/facts then the Judge would make his ruling based on the evidence and facts officially presented in his court.
Has this Judge already decided how he is going to rule? Sure looks that way to me!
I’m afraid we are all in for another one of those illegal, lame brain “NO STANDING” or “STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS” Rulings, which would take a complete lack of Judicial integrity and/or honesty to make, then cowardly and desperately try to hide behind such blatant unjust rulings.
I certainly hope I’m wrong and “JUSTICE” reigns on April 22nd. in California.
April 19th, 2013 @ 12:42 pm
Why would a Judge not allow testimony unless is is scared to death what that testimony might be/prove. I thought a court was suppose to be an open forum where both sides present their evidence/facts then the Judge would make his ruling based on the evidence and facts officially presented in his court.
Has this Judge already decided how he is going to rule? Sure looks that way to me!
I’m afraid we are all in for another one of those illegal, lame brain “NO STANDING” or “STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS” Rulings, which would take a complete lack of any kind of Judicial integrity and/or honesty to make, then cowardly and desperately try to hide behind such blatant unjust rulings.
I certainly hope I’m wrong and “JUSTICE” is given it’s Constitution Given Right to reign on April 22nd. in California.
April 19th, 2013 @ 1:28 pm
Are Judges really allowed to pick and choose what is presented in their courtroom without first letting it be presenting, then analyzing the legal merits before disallowing it to be used?
That just doesn’t sound like the “AMERICAN WAY”.
Where in the Constitution does it give Judges such power?
The fact is the Constitution doesn’t give Judges that kind of power.
Why are all these “LACK OF ELIGIBILITY CASES” NOT GIVEN their right to “DUE PROCESS OF LAW”?
Every single one of these “LACK OF ELIGIBILITY CASES” has been “SHORT CHAINED” when it has come to the right of “DUE PROCESS TO LAW”.
WHY???
Who or what are they all scared of?
Judges, just start ruling on the “LEGAL MERITS” in all these “LACK OF ELIGIBILITY CASES” and stop hiding behind all this “ILLEGAL MUMBLE JUMBLE” that you have been using.
April 19th, 2013 @ 1:45 pm
he did not provide any reason, just wrote in his order that he will not allow any testimony of witnesses during the hearing
April 19th, 2013 @ 2:41 pm
If a Judges doesn’t allow any testimony from witnesses, isn’t that ground for impeaching the Judge?
Can a Judge really just make up his own judicial rules for his courtroom?
Does this mean that all those high ranking Military Officers will not be allowed to utter a single word in court?
If this is true this Hearing on April 22nd is going to be worst than a Kangaroo Court.
Amnerica, please wake up to what is going on!!!
April 19th, 2013 @ 2:41 pm
Having some experience with judges in matters on both sides of an issue, I feel comfortable in saying that most male judges put their shorts on much like any other man to make them down and plain persons. Ditto for panties on most female judges as to ordinary females. The big difference in both cases is ambition to rule over other persons. These people are very prone to be bought by/suckers for money and prestige. If you have a judge as a next door neighbor it would be a safe bet to take that said judge will turn out to be a social enforcer. I think Roberts is a good example.
April 19th, 2013 @ 2:59 pm
Orly, can anyone at Judicial Watch help? Seems this should be right up their alley.
April 19th, 2013 @ 3:56 pm
It is inconceivable to any of us that
a judge can disallow witnesses, not
allow all testimony, facts, evidence,
cover-ups by court clerks, ad infinitum.
If it is allowed, then, may a request
be submitted for another judge, on the
grounds that there is reason to believe
the assigned judge is prejudicial?
What ever happened to our justice system?
I know it is now rotten to the core,
but surely there is some semblance left
of following the rules of law.
If this appointee of Obama’s is going to
shoot down the whole case before he even
hears it, as he did in the past, then
this is indeed a ‘kangaroo court’ and
he should be, in any legal way possible,
barred from the bench as being incompetent.
We are all so naive, to actually think that
this bought and paid for ‘judge’ is going to
be what judges used to be. Get rid of him.
April 19th, 2013 @ 4:45 pm
Appeal every error this judge makes and also see what newspapers in America or overseas will print what is really happening in America. Again, send copies of this outrage to each member of the House and Senate and the Supreme Court and the Joint Chiefs. If America is going to be Constitutionally raped let it not be done without full knowledge to the entire world.
April 19th, 2013 @ 4:53 pm
Default is the obvious outcome. Forward to a Criminal Court.
April 19th, 2013 @ 5:04 pm
doesn’t a judge have to follow some kind of guideline to give the plaintive a chance to show prove when there is evidence to back a claim ? if a judge did not let the evidence be presented,wouldn’t there be grounds for this judge to be in some form of predjudice to the plaintive?i mean……every story has 2 sides……right? this shows how corrupt our system is…
April 19th, 2013 @ 7:06 pm
what will be accomplished if testimony is not allowed?
April 19th, 2013 @ 8:20 pm
Boy, I hope the Military who attend will arrive with their full Military uniforms, emblazened with Patriotism!
April 19th, 2013 @ 8:33 pm
Orly , looking at the previous post i can see we all are asking the same question here!why is it so difficult for the courts to do what is right?
April 20th, 2013 @ 12:36 am
no, they only ask for money, never helped
April 20th, 2013 @ 10:28 am
Why isn’t the Main Stream New Media saying anything about the Hearing that is scheduled for this Monday April 22nd. What are they scared of, losing their jobs? If so, Why?
This Hearing could be one of the most important Hearing in the History of the United States of America, if the presiding Judge, Judge England just allowed this Hearing to be an OPEN and JUST Hearing, where Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., and all the high ranking Military Personnel asking for justice to be done, were allowed to testify and present all their Bona Fide an Unrefuted Evidence, then render a JUST RULING on that testimony and evidence.
The fact that the Main Stream Media and just about every other News Media is remaining mum about the Hearing Schedule this Monday April 22nd, should alarm each and every American, and they should demand that this issue be Front Page until it is brought to a just solution.
America, if we all don’t all get involved along with Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., and all these high ranking Military personnel and help her/them in any and every way that we can to save the American Way of Life, until this mess is cleaned up, we will not have an American Way of Life to save.
Time is quickly running out!
It appears as if our duly elected Politicians, Courts, and News Media are not going to do anything but stand back and watch America be destroyed, so it is now left up to each and every law abiding American to do whatever they can, as quick as they can, to save the American Way of Life.
April 20th, 2013 @ 8:09 pm
Does anybody else see the sick irony in the fact that valid evidence for an eligibility case which substantiates the charges being made would somehow be deemed ineligible?
April 22nd, 2013 @ 6:24 am
“When in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”
April 22nd, 2013 @ 4:08 pm
Is there any way for the evidence to be directly placed, by a citizen, before a California grand jury, for criminal prosecution?