Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2010


World's Leading Obama Eligibility Challenge Web Site


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.

Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.

Contact Dr. Taitz at
orlytaitz@hushmail.com or orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi


Update on Taitz v Dunn, oral argument was yesterday, no order yet

Posted on | April 19, 2012 | No Comments

4th Appellate District Division 3
Court data last updated: 04/19/2012 07:05 PM

Case Summary Docket Briefs Scheduled Actions
Disposition Parties and Attorneys Trial Court

Docket (Register of Actions)
Taitz v. Dunn
Case Number G045351

Date Description Notes
06/08/2011 Notice of appeal lodged/received. Aplt: Orly Taitz
06/17/2011 Received default notice 8.121(a) designation not filed. Dated: Clerks’ and Reporter’s Designation
06/21/2011 Default letter sent; no case information statement filed.
06/24/2011 Civil case information statement filed.
06/24/2011 Filing fee. paid
06/24/2011 Filed proof of service. Amended proof of service for CCIS showing address for respondent (faxed)
06/30/2011 Default notice vacated. Notice of compliance. Designation has bee filed for the clerks and reporters.
07/05/2011 Filed proof of service. Original to fax filed 06/24/11
08/16/2011 Record on appeal filed. 1 CT & 1 RT
09/26/2011 Requested – extension of time

Appellant’s opening brief. Requested for 10/25/2011 By 29 Day(s)
09/27/2011 Granted – extension of time.

Appellant’s opening brief. Due on 10/25/2011 By 29 Day(s)
10/17/2011 Returned document for non-conformance. aplt’s mtn to augment submitted loose papers, no original signatures, no pos and documents do not conform to rule 8.155
10/25/2011 Motion/application to augment record filed. Appellant’s motion to augment the record on appeal, with one (bound separate) vol. of documents. AND ext. request for the AOB of 10 days after the court rules on the augment request.
11/10/2011 To court. Appellant’s request to augment the record. AND a 10 day EOT for the AOB after the court rules on the aug. request.
11/16/2011 Augmentation granted. (See order.) Appellant’s motion to augment the record on appeal is GRANTED. The documents attached to the motion filed October 25, 2011, are DEEMED part of the record on appeal. Appellant’s request for an extension of time to file the appellant’s opening brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s opening brief shall be served and filed 10 days from the date of this order.
11/23/2011 Appellant’s opening brief. Plaintiff and Appellant: Taitz, Orly
Attorney: Orly Taitz
11/30/2011 Returned document for non-conformance. cip returned – need original and four copies and pos attached
11/30/2011 Default appellant; no certificate of interested persons filed. for aob
12/02/2011 Filed proof of service. confirmation of electronic service to Supreme court as to aob
12/05/2011 Certification of Interested Entities or Persons filed. for aob
12/29/2011 Respondent notified re failure to file respondent’s brief.
01/13/2012 Respondent’s brief. Defendant and Respondent: Dunn, Damon
Attorney: Charles K. Bell
01/13/2012 Argument letter sent.
01/13/2012 Request for judicial notice filed. by respondent Damon Dunn.
01/13/2012 Motion filed. by respondent a motion to strike the AOB.
01/13/2012 Filed declaration of: by respondent’s counsel Brian T. Hildreth is support of the motion to strike the AOB.
01/23/2012 Request for oral argument filed by: Aplt Orly Taitz. Time estimate – none provided.
01/23/2012 Request for oral argument filed by: Brian Hildreth counsel for resp. Time estimate – 30 mins.
01/30/2012 To court. (1)Respondent’s request for judicial notice. (2)Respondent’s motion to strike the AOB with a declaration of respondent’s attorney Brian T. Hildreth in support of the motion to strike the AOB.
01/30/2012 Order filed. Respondent’s request to strike appellant’s opening brief is DENIED.
01/30/2012 Request for judicial notice denied. Respondent’s request to take judicial notice filed on January 13, 2012, is DENIED for respondent’s failure to comply with California Rules of Court, rule 8.252.
02/02/2012 Requested – extension of time

Appellant’s reply brief. Requested for 02/16/2012 By 14 Day(s)
02/03/2012 Granted – extension of time.

Appellant’s reply brief. Due on 02/16/2012 By 14 Day(s)
02/07/2012 Request for judicial notice filed. Request for Judicial Notice by the respondent Damon Dunn
02/22/2012 To court. Request for Judicial Notice by the respondent Damon Dunn
02/23/2012 Order filed. Respondent’s request for judicial notice will be decided in conjunction with the decision on appeal.
02/28/2012 Motion for relief from default filed. Motion by appellant to file a late ARB, (ARB submitted with the motion)
02/29/2012 Case briefed and on assignment panel.
03/09/2012 Calendar notice sent. Calendar date: Wednesday, 4-18-12 at 1:00 p.m.
03/15/2012 To court. Motion by appellant to file a late ARB, (ARB submitted with the motion)
03/16/2012 Order filed. Appellant’s request to file a late appellant’s reply brief is GRANTED. The clerk of this court is directed to file forthwith the appellant’s reply brief submitted with the request.
03/16/2012 Appellant’s reply brief. Plaintiff and Appellant: Taitz, Orly
Attorney: Orly Taitz
03/16/2012 Case fully briefed.
04/18/2012 Request filed to: The request filed by On Second Thoughts TV, Cable TV show for Comcast & Japan to photograph, record or broadcast – OA.
04/18/2012 Order filed. The request filed by On Second Thoughts TV, Cable TV show for Comcast & Japan to photograph, record or broadcast is GRANTED subject to the conditions in rule 1.150, C.R.C. and the following: All media hook-ups will take place in the North Parking Lot. No cameras in the courtroom. No still pictures in the courtroom. No interruption of court proceedings. All interviews are to be held outside the court building.
04/18/2012 Cause argued and submitted. Merits. Cause called. Orly Taitz argued for appellant. Brian Hildreth argued for respondent. Cause submitted
Share
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

Leave a Reply