I am trying to find events where judges appear to ask why they are committing treason and covering up Obama’s forged IDs. Need help
Posted on | March 2, 2013 | 53 Comments
I need your help in finding events where U.S. judges, US. sheriffs, AGs, Congressmen, Senators, Director of FBI, Director of Social Security meet with public and answer questions. In our most “transparent country I can’t find any such meeting. the only thing I could find on the net, is a report of Morsi meeting top judges in Egypt.
I need your help in finding such meetings with judges and officials.
we demand answers from our corrupt ruling class “Why are they collectively committing treason and covering up Obama’s use of forged and stolen IDs”
Comments
53 Responses to “I am trying to find events where judges appear to ask why they are committing treason and covering up Obama’s forged IDs. Need help”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
March 2nd, 2013 @ 9:24 am
Dr. Taitz. Your endless pursuit of justice is admirable to many of us. It is beyond my comprehension how you are able to continue all of your work with running a dental practice, cooking and cleaning for your family and caring for your three children. Perhaps after you have successfully put Obama in the big house, you would be kind enough to write a book giving others advice on how to beat the odds while running a law firm, dental practice and raising and caring for your family.
God Bless you for everything you do.
March 2nd, 2013 @ 9:36 am
Love to help but I don’t understand your request.
March 2nd, 2013 @ 9:56 am
I think your gonna have better luck asking O to provide his b-certificate. I do recall you asking Roberts (per video) and him telling you to leave your documents with security!! spread this one around!!
March 2nd, 2013 @ 10:16 am
Obama, Crimes, Fraud, Felony, Unconstitutional, violations, TSA …
undefined
http://www.commieblaster.com/obamacrimes/index.htmlShare
See Obama’s Crimes, Felonies, Fraud, Law Violations, Unconstitutional Acts, Mobs, Rezko, Blago. … COVER-UPS, MURDER, 2ND ADMENDMENT VIOLATIONS, TREASON, …. Let’s Bang This Drum: I’m Seizing Capitol Hill Because There Is Criminal … Your Fellow Sheriff, Arpaio Has Proved Obama’s a Fake President …
You’ve visited this page 2 times. Last visit: 2/24/13
March 2nd, 2013 @ 10:17 am
call me i can get any data on any thing i will try to help 412 367 5704
March 2nd, 2013 @ 10:39 am
Our best shot may be with our Sheriffs. They are the highest law enforcement officers in a county, they report to the people & take an oath to defend the Constitution…If all your followers would contact their Sheriff and present a packet of info, I’d imagine there is an obligation to respond. Groups of people presenting info to the Sheriff in person is even better….Why aren’t the Tea Parties addressing this???
March 2nd, 2013 @ 11:20 am
Orly , Now this is a great Idea. I have called Sheriffs, State Police,CIA, FBI,Dept of Labor,Dept of no
Justice,Congress,Senate,etc,etc,etc,etc.
Not One Person wants to pursue this Traitor Fraud. Im trying my Hardest as you are as well.
March 2nd, 2013 @ 1:02 pm
You could start with the Builderburgers and Illuminati. They are all a part of the regime.
March 2nd, 2013 @ 1:05 pm
Freedom First—I’ve wondered about the Tea Pary too. Why are they not helping tp persue this?
March 2nd, 2013 @ 1:31 pm
If you want to do as Michelle Obama says and dig a little deeper. You will find that Obama and all the people he’s appointed to higher office around him and most of the Judges are all members of free masons. They won’t go against each other. Also most of the leaders around the world are part of this group. As is Soro.
March 2nd, 2013 @ 1:50 pm
Opinion
Print Article | Email Friend | Reprint Permissions
Obama administration to federal judge: We can force your wife to violate her religion
by Joe Carter
Tue Feb 26, 2013 15:42 EST
Comments (36)
Tags: hhs mandate, obamacare, religious freedom
Tweet
WASHINGTON, D.C., February 26, 2013, (Acton Institute) – Has there ever, in the history of America, been a presidential administration as dismissive of religious liberties as the Obama Administration?
The Administration seems to truly believe that when religious beliefs come into conflict with one of the President’s pet policies—such as employers being forced to pay for contraceptives and abortifacients—that religious liberties must be set aside. A prime example is the Administration’s idea that by forming a business entity intended to limit liability, a person loses their First Amendment right to the free exercise of religion.
As CNSNews reports, during an oral argument in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia last fall, a lawyer for the U.S. Justice Department told a federal judge that the Obama administration believed it could force the judge’s own wife—a physician—to act against her religious faith in the conduct of her medical practice.
Here is the exchange, from the official court transcript, between this Obama administration lawyer and Judge Walton:
Benjamin Berwick: “Well, your honor, I think, I think there are two distinct ideas here: One is: Is the corporation itself religious such that it can exercise religion? And my, our argument is that it is not. Although again, we admit that it is a closer case than for a lot of other companies. And then the second question is, can the owners–is it a substantial burden on the owners when the requirement falls on the company that is a separate legal entity? I think for that question precisely what their beliefs are doesn’t really matter. I mean, they allege that their religious beliefs are being violated. We don’t question that. And we don’t question that that is the belief.
Judge Reggie Walton: But considering the closeness of the relationship that the individual owners have to the corporation to require them to fund what they believe amounts to the taking of a life, I don’t know what could be more contrary to one’s religious belief than that.
Berwick: Well, I don’t think the fact this is a closely-held corporation is particularly relevant, your honor. I mean, Mars, for example–
Judge Walton: Well, I mean, my wife has a medical practice. She has a corporation, but she’s the sole owner and sole stock owner. If she had strongly-held religious belief and she made that known that she operated her medical practice from that perspective, could she be required to pay for these types of items if she felt that that was causing her to violate her religious beliefs?
Berwick: Well, Your Honor, I think what it comes down to is whether there is a legal separation between the company and—
Judge Walton: It’s a legal separation. I mean, she obviously has created the corporation to limit her potential individual liability, but she’s the sole owner and everybody associates that medical practice with her as an individual. And if, you know, she was very active in her church and her church had these same type of strong religious-held beliefs, and members of the church and the community became aware of the fact that she is funding something that is totally contrary to what she professes as her belief, why should she have to do that?
Berwick: Well, your honor, again, I think it comes down to the fact that the corporation and the owner truly are separate. They are separate legal entities.
Judge Walton: So, she’d have to give up the limitation that conceivably would befall on her regarding liability in order to exercise her religion? So, she’d have to go as an individual proprietor with no corporation protection in order to assert her religious right? Isn’t that as significant burden?
In reference to the judge’s concerns, the government lawyer says, “I actually don’t think it is that important.” What he does believe is important is contraceptives, since they are “important to the health and well-being of women and to advancing gender equality.” Yet even if we concede this point, the Administration has given no rational explanation for why is it necessary for an employer to violate their conscience in order to pay for someone else’s contraceptives.
Click “like” if you are PRO-LIFE!
Fortunately, on Nov. 16, Judge Walton granted Tyndale a preliminary injunction preventing the Obama administration from forcing the corporation to violate the religious beliefs of its owners. Hopefully, when the issue is taken up by the Supreme Court the judiciary will, once and for all, put an end to President Obama’s trampling of religious freedom.
This article originally appeared on the website of the Acton Institute and is reprinted with permission.
– See more at: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/obama-administration-to-federal-judge-we-can-force-your-wife-to-violate-her#sthash.mUuaGk20.4XbBn63c.dpuf
March 2nd, 2013 @ 2:37 pm
The JAG HUNTER
DAUNTLESS and UNAFRAID in DEFIANCE!
A TREASON SAMPLE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT anyone can write naming OBAMA in commission of TREASON!
Thursday, 29 November 2012
Date goes here
From: YOUR NAME GOES HERE!
To:
The Federal Grand Juries sitting in (wherever you live) via your federal district attorney
Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Robert Swan Mueller (935 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington D.C., 20535-0001)
The Foreman (of you local County, Borough, Parish) Grand Jury
Your local Sheriff (OPTIONAL)
SUBJECT: SWORN AFFIDAVIT: Formal criminal complaint naming Barack Hussein OBAMA and OBAMA’s CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS in commission of the crime of TREASON against the United States of America. (In this line you can name whatever official you choose)
1. We are arrived at a point in our Nation’s life where Barack Hussein OBAMA and OBAMA’s CRIMINAL ASSISTANTS threaten the life of our Nation to the point of death. OBAMA and his CRIMINAL COHORTS install an unconstitutional, rival and competing government that replaces our United States Constitution.
2. Mr. OBAMA’s unconstitutional government is thriving and growing. Under Mr. OBAMA the United States Constitution no longer operates. Mr. OBAMA and his OUTLAW PARTNERS enforce only their own form unconstitutional, treasonous government.
3. Mr. Obama—exposed a foreign born domestic enemy—infiltrated the White House by force of contrivance, concealment, conceit, counterfeit, dissembling, and deceit.
4. (THESE THREE OR ANY OTHER ACT OF OBAMA’S TREASON CAN BE ADDED OR SUBSTITUTED – HERE ARE THREE EXAMPLE ITEMS)
ITEM: Perpetrating acts of fraud, perjury and conspiracy in his refusal to confirm his lawful eligibility to serve as president under the U.S. Constitution Article II, Section 1, constituting treasonous felony offenses of high crimes and misdemeanors in violation of our U.S. Constitution Article II, Section 4; (More accusations found at this LINK)
ITEM: Surrendering sovereign U.S. war-making to foreign powers and international authorities by attacking Libya without consulting Congress, in violation of U.S. Constitution Article 1, Section 8 and U.S. Code Title 50, Chapter 33:1541-1548;
ITEM: Accepting foreign title and office while acting as U.S. President and without consulting Congress when in 2009, Obama assumed the Chairmanship of the UN Security Council, the international body responsible for declaring war on behalf of the UN, in violation of U.S. Constitution Article I, Section 9.
5. Be mindful and clear on this point, this point alone: We the People are the final arbiters in this matter. We the People hold in our hands the final appeal and redress our Declaration of Independence and United States Constitution command.
I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT!
Born fighting,
Notarized /s/
Sworn and issued before me
___________________________________________________________this_____
_________day of (month of the year) 2012 (or 2013)
at_________________a.m./p.m. (LOCAL TIME)
My commission expires:________________________.
(Distribution: List here the names of others you send copies to)
March 2nd, 2013 @ 2:52 pm
Here are but a few charges
Specific instances of Treason include but are not limited to the following:
1. U.S. Army troops were deployed in Samson, Alabama on March 10, 2009. In response to a Freedom of Information request by the Dothan Eagle (see Lance Griffin), the Department of Army Inspector General found that the armed troops deployed to Samson, Alabama violated the Posse Comitatus Act, which restrains the use of the military for civilian law enforcement purposes.
2. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA violated Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution by becoming the first United States President to chair the United Nations Security Council. To Wit:
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, or Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
3. (a) Mr. OBAMA declared War on the Republic of Libya on March 17, 2011 without the approval of the Congress, violating Article 1, Section 10, Clause 3 of our United States Constitution.
3. (b) Mr. OBAMA has also entered into an Agreement with the Muslim Brotherhood (Ikhwan), a foreign Power, and with the intent to sell 125 tanks to Egypt, home of the Muslim Brotherhood, violating Article 1, Section 10, Clause 3 of our United States Constitution. To Wit:
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay.
4. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA is under investigation by California Congressman Darrell Issa for Project Gunrunner, and justice is clearly obstructed in this case as well as the Black Panther voter intimidation case.
March 2nd, 2013 @ 3:08 pm
video on this site
March 2nd, 2013 @ 3:11 pm
Barack Obama — WikiLeaks
This video interview blows this scandal wide open. Julian Assange, founder of Wikileaks talk with Judge Napolitano of Fox News (02:03). When asked by Judge …
theobamafile.com/_oddsnends/WikiLeaks.htm
March 2nd, 2013 @ 3:43 pm
Nazi Obama met with Nazi Roberts in his Supreme Court office as I recall.
March 2nd, 2013 @ 3:46 pm
Every president except Kennedy was a Freemason, and that was only because he was a Catholic and they can’t be Freemasons.
March 2nd, 2013 @ 4:00 pm
update the names in the positions recently appointed and use this as a petition to the sergent at arms united states house of congress to be delivered to the speaker of the house, majority leader of the senate, and chief justice of the supreme court.
WE THE PEOPLE
On behalf of the Veterans and former Service Members of America, who fought and died for freedom and liberty here and abroad, and all good and decent American citizens from sea to shining sea, we the people of the United States of America hereby demand the immediate restoration of our Constitutional Republic and an end to the Democratic Socialist abuses and usurpations which have become commonplace in the daily corruption of our governmental offices.
No longer will we sit idly by and tolerate the utter destruction of our country, at the hands of anti-American elitists in Washington D.C. who have mistaken the people’s peaceful tolerance for acceptance of their ill-advised behaviors. The time for all good and decent Americans to stand together, in defense of the Constitution, the Republic, freedom and liberty, has arrived. The Rule of Constitutional Law must prevail. We call upon all who have taken an oath to protect and defend, to take appropriate measures now. We the people hereby demand
1. The immediate and unconditional orderly resignation of Barack Hussein Obama, II
2. The immediate and unconditional orderly resignation of Joseph R. Biden In addition to the known fact that the Obama/Biden ticket was advanced by way of fraudulent representations concerning the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama II, under Article II requirements for the office of President, the Obama/Biden has committed countless crimes against the U.S. Constitution, our Republican form of government and the American people while in control of the Executive Branch. They are not able to do this alone, but with the help and cover of many anti-American players, who have also acted at odds with their oaths to protect and defend the Constitution, our Republic and the people of the United States. As a result, these players must be removed from office and held accountable for their actions as well. This group includes, but is not limited to the following individuals –
3. The immediate and unconditional orderly resignation of the entire Obama Cabinet, including but not limited to;
· the White House staff and unelected Czar’s
· Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton
· Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner
· Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta
· Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.
· Interior Secretary Kenneth L. Salazar
· Acting Commerce Secretary Dr. Rebecca M. Blank
· Labor Secretary Hilda L. Solis
· Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius
· Energy Secretary Steven Chu
· Education Secretary Arne Duncan
· Homeland Security Secretary Janet A. Napolitano
· EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson
· Office of Management & Budget Director Jacob J. Lew
· UN Ambassador Susan Rice, the entire Council of Economic Advisers
· Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan
· Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor
· House Speaker John Boehner
· House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi
· Senate Leader Harry Reid
· Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell – all of whom have committed treasonous acts against the people, the states and the U.S. Constitution.
Further, to reinstate the rule of law and the Law of this Land, the U.S. Constitution and our constitutional republic –
1. In compliance with Article II – Section I of the U.S. Constitution for the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the Same shall devolve on the Vice President, — the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.
2. That every verifiable member of The Communist Party USA, The Socialist Party USA and The Democratic Socialists of America be immediately publicly identified and removed from office for overtly acting against freedom, liberty and the Constitutional Republic.
3. That in the event that these individuals refuse to immediately resign in an orderly fashion designed to serve the best interests of the United States, we demand that the 66 members of the people’s House who voted against the recent raising of the nation’s debt ceiling, to immediately begin impeachment proceedings against every member of the Obama administration.
4. That the seven remaining members of the U.S. Supreme Court place an immediate stay on all Executive and Legislative actions taken under the term of the unconstitutional administration beginning January 20, 2009.
5. That remaining members of the House and Senate immediately act to name new majority and minority leaders of congress, and work with the U.S. Supreme Court in the assigning of new temporary Executive Branch members, acting on behalf of the people and the will of the American majority until such time that the citizens of the United States can elect their new representatives.
6. The immediate and unconditional dissolution of all special interest congressional caucuses, including but not limited to The Progressive Caucus, The Black Caucus. In addition, the immediate closure of any and all congressional committees which have been given unconstitutional powers, including the Debt Committee of twelve just formed. Individuals are elected by the people to represent ALL of the people, not special interest groups.
7. That each state government immediately act to enforce its 10th Amendment right to protect and defend the people of their state against a tyrannical central power in Washington D.C., by recalling all State Guard troops home to protect the sovereignty and security of their respective citizens, as well as state resources and governments.
8. That each state government act immediately to cut itself off from federal funding, and take the necessary actions to balance their own state and local budgets immediately.
These are our initial demands and nothing less than complete compliance with each of these demands is acceptable to the people of the United States. Further, it is our position that the normal constitutional line of succession to the presidency does not apply in this circumstance, due to the widespread complicity by members of congress, regarding both the original fraud that placed this administration in power and the ongoing effort to cover up the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American citizens. The abuse and usurpation of the U.S. Constitution will not be allowed to stand. It is on this basis that We the People make these demands, in full compliance with the law of this land, the Constitution of the United States of America.
It is our sincere desire to affect these immediate and unconditional changes to the people’s government through peaceful processes, causing a minimum degree of disruption to the vital ongoing business of the people and their representative government.
The individuals named in our demand for immediate and unconditional resignations have acted directly and overtly against the people, the states and the Constitution and they must be held fully accountable for their actions.
March 2nd, 2013 @ 4:12 pm
Denna, my only theory is the Tea Party is trying to go main stream. The Alinsky tactics used by the MSM have been so effective that the Tea party feels pursuing this most critical issue will categorize the Tea Party as fringe…The reality is the TRUTH WILL ALWAYS PREVAIL….Those leading the Tea Party are very mistaken for not pursing the truth and instead playing in the enemy’s sandbox.. The people are waking up and know the truth, so it is only a matter of time now We must remember and hold accountable those who knew the truth and yet were afraid to stand in the truth. They are among the traitors.
March 2nd, 2013 @ 4:20 pm
Maybe this is the answer.
https://hopegirl2012.wordpress.com/
March 2nd, 2013 @ 4:23 pm
It shall be the duty of the Sergeant at Arms of the House of Representatives to attend the House during its sittings, to maintain order under the direction of the Speaker, and, pending the election of a Speaker or Speaker pro tempore, under the direction of the Clerk, execute the commands of the House and all processes issued by authority thereof, directed to him by the Speaker.
Amendments
1996 – Pub. L. 104-186 struck out “, keep the accounts for the pay and mileage of Members and Delegates, and pay them as provided by law” after “directed to him by the Speaker”. LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY OF SERGEANT AT ARMS Pub. L. 104-53, title III, Sec. 313, Nov. 19, 1995, 109 Stat. 538, provided that: “(a) The Sergeant at Arms of the House of Representatives shall have the same law enforcement authority, including the authority to carry firearms, as a member of the Capitol Police.
The law enforcement authority under the preceding sentence shall be subject to the requirement that the Sergeant at Arms have the qualifications specified in subsection (b). “(b) The qualifications referred to in subsection (a) are the following: “(1) A minimum of five years of experience as a law enforcement officer before beginning service as the Sergeant at Arms. “(2) Current certification in the use of firearms by the appropriate Federal law enforcement entity or an equivalent non-Federal entity. “(3) Any other firearms qualification required for members of the Capitol Police. “(c) The Committee on House Oversight [now Committee on House Administration] of the House of Representatives shall have authority to prescribe regulations to carry out this section.”
March 2nd, 2013 @ 4:47 pm
https://www.naturalnews.com/038857_sheriffs_Constitution_Bill_of_Rights.html
This is an organization of sheriffs who are pledged to uphold the Constitution and their oaths.
March 2nd, 2013 @ 5:02 pm
Obama and Biden Indicted by Florida Grand Jury
Posted by By GeorgeM at 30 October, at 16 : 16 PM Print
Obama and Biden Indicted by Florida Grand Jury
413
Obama and Biden Indicted by Grand Jury
(Ocala, Florida, October 30, 2012). Larry Klayman, the founder and chairman of Freedom Watch today announced that President Barack Obama and Vice President Joseph Biden have been criminally indicted for having willfully released classified national security information concerning the raid on Osama bin Laden’s compound, U.S. and Israeli war plans concerning Iran and their cyber-attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities. The release of this information, among other harm to U.S. national security, resulted in the killing of members of Seal Team Six by terrorists and the arrest and imprisonment of American covert agents by Pakistan, such as the doctor who aided the CIA with regard to the bin Laden assassination. U.S.-Israeli war plans with Iran have also been compromised.
A true bill of indictment was issued by a Citizens’ Grand Jury in Ocala, Florida, who reviewed evidence and voted unanimously to indict Obama and Biden at 6:02 pm on October 29, 2012.
The authority for a Citizens’ Grand Jury can be found at http://www.citizensgrandjury.com.
The criminal defendants, Obama and Biden, will now be given notice of their indictment, arraigned and then tried for their alleged crimes.
Mr. Klayman, the Citizens’ Prosecutor, issued the following statement: “The Citizens’ Grand Jury, after having deliberated, yesterday issued a true bill of indictment. See http://www.citizensgrandjury.com It did the work that the government should have done, but does not have the integrity to do; that is hold these public officials accountable under the law. For far too long, government prosecutors, who are put in place by politicians, have looked the other way as high public officials like Obama and Biden violate the law to further their political agendas. Now, as a result, the people must therefore exercise the rights given to them by the framers of the Constitution, and themselves take legitimate measures to restore the nation to some semblance of legality. This indictment (see http://www.citizensgrandjury.com) of Obama and Biden is just the first step in a legal revolution to reclaim the nation from establishment politicians, government officials and judges who have represented only their own political and other interests at the expense of ‘We the People.’ Obama and Biden will now be tried in a court of law and I am confident that they will be convicted of these alleged crimes.”
For information see http://www.citizensgrandjury.com or contact Adrienne Mazzone: 561-750-9800 x210; amazzone@transmediagroup.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here is the original proposed order. No, we don’t know why it appears in reverse order. Perhaps one of the legal experts who roam this site could enlighten us.
https://www.wnd.com/files/2012/10/Citizens-Grand-Jury-Indictment-of-Defendants-OBAMA-and-BIDEN.pdf
Looks like this is hitting some other news outlets now:
https://www.sacbee.com/2012/10/30/4948682/citizens-grand-jury-indicts-obama.html
Post to Facebook
Post to Twitter
Add to LinkedIn
Add to Google Bookmarks
Post to Delicious
Post to StumbleUpon
Add to Reddit
Send via Gmail
Send via E-mail program
Print with PrintFriendly
Post to Blogger
Send via Buzzster!
Add to Plaxo Pulse
Send via Yahoo Mail
Send via Hotmail
March 2nd, 2013 @ 5:04 pm
Attack on Stevens Was A Professional Job: https://youtu.be/IGPHm2bpryc via @youtube
March 2nd, 2013 @ 5:07 pm
The Obama Hustle
The Rediscovered Truth About Barack H Obama
Obama Caught Lying On His 2006 U.S. Senate Financial Disclosure Report
with 13 comments
21 Votes
As reported by “The Obama Hustle” : https://theobamahustle.wordpress.com/2011/08/11/%e2%80%9cquestions-answered-for-the-obama-104500-00-%e2%80%9cbuffer-zone-a-gift-from-rita-rezko-to-the-trust/ and at World Net Daily article : Tax Fraud Suspected In Obama Land Deal it is now known that Barack H Obama has possibly committed real estate and tax fraud as it pertains to the house that he does not own in Chicago, located at 5046 S Greenwood Ave., Chicago, IL 60615.
The following graphic images will illustrate the point that the Obama’s own nothing. It has also been stated that the Obama’s own/started the trust that owns 5046 S Greenwood Ave and again the answer to that question is no. The Northern Trust Co., Trust # 10209 which is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT ) is the actual owner of 5046 S Greenwood Ave.
Fig 1. Source: The Cook County Recorder of Deeds
Name: NORTHERN TRUST CO TR Dates: Any To
Role: Grantor Document Type: Any
Document No. Document Type Date Recorded PIN Grantor Grantee
0535335180 MORTGAGE 12/19/2005 20-11-115-034-0000 NORTHERN TRUST CO TR NORTHERN TRUST CO
0517233011 MORTGAGE 06/21/2005 20-11-115-034-0000 NORTHERN TRUST CO TR NORTHERN TRUST CO
0515339067 ASSIGNMENT OF BENEFICIAL INT 06/02/2005 NORTHERN TRUST CO TR NORTHERN TRUST CO TR
The above image illustrates the actual owner of 5046 S Greenwood Ave. It needs to be noted that these are the transactions that created PIN # 20-11-115-037-0000 which in-turn absorbed the “buffer zone” illegally in 2007
The following graphic image illustrates the actual owner of the so-called Obama “buffer zone”.
Fig 2. Source: The Cook County Recorder of Deeds
Documents for PIN:20-11-115-035-0000
Document No. Document Type Date Recorded Grantor/Trust No. Grantee/Trust No. Prior Document
0604733162 DEED IN TRUST 02/16/2006 REZKO RITA M NORTHERN TRUST CO TR / 10209
The above image illustrates the actual owner of the so-called Obama “buffer zone” and it is not the Obama’s as stated by Barack H Obama in 2008 when he was question about the ownership and transfer of the property in a separate real estate transaction with Rita Rezko in 02/2006 of which he claims that he paid $104,500.00 for the plot which has since been absorbed with out ever being properly assessed or taxed as a separate real estate transaction should have been.
The following image was emailed to The Obama Hustle stating that this is the record showing that the Obama’s are the true owners of 5046 S Greenwood Ave. Pay close attention to the so-called proof and see for yourself the abnormalities within this document.
Fig 3
The above document does not prove that the Obama’s own 5046 S Greenwood Ave. nor does it rove that they own a “Trust” of any kind. Furthermore, the document is referring to beneficiary signatures signed in “Lake” County and not Cook County. This document was also completed in the presence of William Miceli who was Barack Obama former supervisor at the Law Firm of Miner Barnhill & Galland.
The above information is leading to this explanation referencing Barack Obama’s 2006 United States Senate Financial Disclosure Report. As noted above in 02/2006 when the separate real estate transaction took place for the purchase of the $104,500.00 “buffer zone” Obama specifically state that he purchased the lot directly from Rezko. It has also been stated that the Obama own/started the Trust that owns 5046 S Greenwood Ave. The above images prove that to be false.
The following graphic image was collected from OpenSecrets.org The following image is from Obama’s 2006 U.S. Senate Financial Disclosure Report which has to be completed annually.
Fig 4
As noted in the above image it clearly states that, “Any purchase, sale, or exchange by you, your spouse, or dependent child during the reporting period of any real property” must be noted in Part IV under Transactions in excess of $1000.00. Then Senator Barack Obama failed to mention the separate real estate transaction that was separate from the transaction involving his supposed home in Chicago for the Rezko “buffer zone” a transaction which was in excess of $1,000.00, a clear violation of Senate Ethics Rules.
Q. Why did Senator Barack Obama in 2006 not disclose the purchase of real property (a separate real estate transaction that did not involve a personal residence) as stipulated by the report which was over $1,000.00 in value and which must be completed truthfully so as to show complete transparency in then Senator Barack Obama’s financial disclosures?
Q. Could it be that Barack Obama did not want to show that he was not the actual owner of 5046 S Greenwood Ave.?
Q. Could it be that he did not want to show that he was not the owner of the so-called “buffer zone” which was a separate real estate transaction that should have been disclosed in his U.S. Senate Financial Disclosure Report for 2006?
Q. Could it be that he did not want to disclose his dealings with the Rezko’s?
Clearly Barack H Obama did not comply with the U.S. Senate rules in disclosing all transactions that exceed $1,000.00 as stipulated by the report from 2006. Therefore, the conclusion can be drawn that Barack H Obama has committed an infraction/violation of United States Senate Ethics Rules as it pertains to proper disclosures of financial transactions.
March 2nd, 2013 @ 5:07 pm
The Obama Hustle
The Rediscovered Truth About Barack H Obama
Obama Caught Lying On His 2006 U.S. Senate Financial Disclosure Report
with 13 comments
21 Votes
As reported by “The Obama Hustle” : https://theobamahustle.wordpress.com/2011/08/11/%e2%80%9cquestions-answered-for-the-obama-104500-00-%e2%80%9cbuffer-zone-a-gift-from-rita-rezko-to-the-trust/ and at World Net Daily article : Tax Fraud Suspected In Obama Land Deal it is now known that Barack H Obama has possibly committed real estate and tax fraud as it pertains to the house that he does not own in Chicago, located at 5046 S Greenwood Ave., Chicago, IL 60615.
The following graphic images will illustrate the point that the Obama’s own nothing. It has also been stated that the Obama’s own/started the trust that owns 5046 S Greenwood Ave and again the answer to that question is no. The Northern Trust Co., Trust # 10209 which is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT ) is the actual owner of 5046 S Greenwood Ave.
Fig 1. Source: The Cook County Recorder of Deeds
Name: NORTHERN TRUST CO TR Dates: Any To
Role: Grantor Document Type: Any
Document No. Document Type Date Recorded PIN Grantor Grantee
0535335180 MORTGAGE 12/19/2005 20-11-115-034-0000 NORTHERN TRUST CO TR NORTHERN TRUST CO
0517233011 MORTGAGE 06/21/2005 20-11-115-034-0000 NORTHERN TRUST CO TR NORTHERN TRUST CO
0515339067 ASSIGNMENT OF BENEFICIAL INT 06/02/2005 NORTHERN TRUST CO TR NORTHERN TRUST CO TR
The above image illustrates the actual owner of 5046 S Greenwood Ave. It needs to be noted that these are the transactions that created PIN # 20-11-115-037-0000 which in-turn absorbed the “buffer zone” illegally in 2007
The following graphic image illustrates the actual owner of the so-called Obama “buffer zone”.
Fig 2. Source: The Cook County Recorder of Deeds
Documents for PIN:20-11-115-035-0000
Document No. Document Type Date Recorded Grantor/Trust No. Grantee/Trust No. Prior Document
0604733162 DEED IN TRUST 02/16/2006 REZKO RITA M NORTHERN TRUST CO TR / 10209
The above image illustrates the actual owner of the so-called Obama “buffer zone” and it is not the Obama’s as stated by Barack H Obama in 2008 when he was question about the ownership and transfer of the property in a separate real estate transaction with Rita Rezko in 02/2006 of which he claims that he paid $104,500.00 for the plot which has since been absorbed with out ever being properly assessed or taxed as a separate real estate transaction should have been.
The following image was emailed to The Obama Hustle stating that this is the record showing that the Obama’s are the true owners of 5046 S Greenwood Ave. Pay close attention to the so-called proof and see for yourself the abnormalities within this document.
Fig 3
The above document does not prove that the Obama’s own 5046 S Greenwood Ave. nor does it rove that they own a “Trust” of any kind. Furthermore, the document is referring to beneficiary signatures signed in “Lake” County and not Cook County. This document was also completed in the presence of William Miceli who was Barack Obama former supervisor at the Law Firm of Miner Barnhill & Galland.
The above information is leading to this explanation referencing Barack Obama’s 2006 United States Senate Financial Disclosure Report. As noted above in 02/2006 when the separate real estate transaction took place for the purchase of the $104,500.00 “buffer zone” Obama specifically state that he purchased the lot directly from Rezko. It has also been stated that the Obama own/started the Trust that owns 5046 S Greenwood Ave. The above images prove that to be false.
The following graphic image was collected from OpenSecrets.org The following image is from Obama’s 2006 U.S. Senate Financial Disclosure Report which has to be completed annually.
Fig 4
As noted in the above image it clearly states that, “Any purchase, sale, or exchange by you, your spouse, or dependent child during the reporting period of any real property” must be noted in Part IV under Transactions in excess of $1000.00. Then Senator Barack Obama failed to mention the separate real estate transaction that was separate from the transaction involving his supposed home in Chicago for the Rezko “buffer zone” a transaction which was in excess of $1,000.00, a clear violation of Senate Ethics Rules.
Q. Why did Senator Barack Obama in 2006 not disclose the purchase of real property (a separate real estate transaction that did not involve a personal residence) as stipulated by the report which was over $1,000.00 in value and which must be completed truthfully so as to show complete transparency in then Senator Barack Obama’s financial disclosures?
Q. Could it be that Barack Obama did not want to show that he was not the actual owner of 5046 S Greenwood Ave.?
Q. Could it be that he did not want to show that he was not the owner of the so-called “buffer zone” which was a separate real estate transaction that should have been disclosed in his U.S. Senate Financial Disclosure Report for 2006?
Q. Could it be that he did not want to disclose his dealings with the Rezko’s?
Clearly Barack H Obama did not comply with the U.S. Senate rules in disclosing all transactions that exceed $1,000.00 as stipulated by the report from 2006. Therefore, the conclusion can be drawn that Barack H Obama has committed an infraction/violation of United States Senate Ethics Rules as it pertains to proper disclosures of financial transactions.
March 2nd, 2013 @ 5:11 pm
THE TRUTH: Ex-IRS Agent Discusses Obama’s Criminal Past https://cleowaller.blogspot.com/2013/03/obama-may-have-criminal-past-posted-by.html?spref=tw
March 2nd, 2013 @ 5:16 pm
Explosive New Book: Following Orders: The Death of Vince Foster https://shar.es/jwQpU via @gatewaypundit
March 2nd, 2013 @ 5:16 pm
Freemason’s or no Freemason’s ;;;
They are going Down.
March 2nd, 2013 @ 5:49 pm
Obama’s Legal Humiliation
inShare15
Barack Obama speech 4 SC Obama’s Legal Humiliation
Part 2 of:Barack Obama Foreign Student –American Media Threatened into Silence
Today,there is no American news outlet factually covering the illegal actions of the sitting President of the United States in context. Nor is there one consistently exposing the laws his administration has flagrantly broken,though this corruption now demonstrably permeates every level of the federal system.
Attorneys General Tom Horne,Arizona;Pam Bondi,Florida;Sam Olens,Georgia;Bill Schuette,Michigan;Scott Pruitt,Oklahoma;Marty Jackley,South Dakota;Alan Wilson,South Carolina;Greg Abbott,Texas;and Ken Cuccinelli of Virginia produced a joint memo on March 5th,2012 detailing 21 blatant violations of law committed by the Obama administration.
By now it is unsurprising the media has by and large ignored this announcement,although AG Cuccinelli did appear in an extended segment with CSPAN (the relevant segment can be found here) on March 18th.
Fortunately,The Tea Party Tribune published the Attorney’s General memo,“A Report on Obama Administration Violations of Law” in full the same day it was released. It is nothing short of a flashing legal headline story,yet cannot be found at the Washington Post or the New York Times.
“Whether it is through the EPA,NLRB,Office of Surface Mining,FCC or other entities,the Obama Administration has aggressively used administrative agencies to implement policy objectives that cannot gain congressional approval and are outside of the law.” –A Report on Obama Administration Violations of Law
An abbreviated list of broken laws includes:
PPACA (Obamacare):Individual Mandate;To be heard by Supreme Court of the United States in March
FCC:Regulation of the Internet in the face of a court order from Circuit Court of Appeals for Washington D.C. stating that the FCC does not have the power to regulate the Internet
EPA 1:GHG (Green House Gas) lawsuit;EPA’s own Inspector General reported last September that EPA failed to comply with its own data standards;Heard in Circuit Court of Appeals for Washington D.C. in February
OSM:Attempting to impose regulatory requirements on the 19 states with authority for exclusive regulation of their coalmines for the first time in more than 30 years
DOJ:South Carolina &Voting Rights Act:Rejecting voter ID statutes that are similar to those already approved by the Supreme Court of the United States;DOJ ignored section 8 of the Voting Rights Act which calls for protections against voter fraud,and used section 5 to administratively block measures to protect the integrity of elections passed by state legislatures in preclearance states including South Carolina;South Carolina voter ID law merely requires a voter to show photo identification in order to vote or to complete an affidavit at the pain of perjury if the voter does not have a photo ID
DOJ:Arizona &Voting Rights Act:Rejecting voter ID statutes that are similar to those already approved by the Supreme Court of the United States
DOE:Yucca Mountain;In 2009,Administration arbitrarily broke federal law and derailed the most studied energy project in American history when DOE announced intent to withdraw 8,000 page Yucca Mountain licensing application with prejudice.
– A Report on Obama Administration Violations of Law
14 more violations of law are listed in the AGs’ memo. At one time or another,many of these violations have made the news,yet the full list is never presented to the public. When compiled,it is apparent even at a glance that the federal government as led by Barack Obama has no respect for the law. Clearly,the Obama government is acting as it deems fit. Much as a monarchy would. As if the States did not exist. As if the Constitution of the United States did not apply.
Indeed,when it comes to Obama and his government,the Constitution is a barrier to be removed. As Obama stated in a 2001 interview with NPR,“generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties.” Undeniably,the Constitution limits government negatively;it states what the government cannot do. From the point of view of someone attempting to expand government powers beyond that which the Constitution limits it to,it is extraordinarily (and negatively) limiting. It was designed that way. It is the keystone,the cornerstone,the foundation of a free people;one freed and protected from government tyranny.
The M-1/A-2 tank in the room
If more evidence were needed to delineate the obvious disrespect coming from the Oval Office for the Law,on Monday,April 2nd 2012,President Barack Obama attempted to erase 200 years of legal history,stating in a press conference with world leaders that the law codified in the Supreme Court Case Marbury v. Madison (5 U.S. 137) 1803 is not valid:
“Ultimately,I’m confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected congress.” – Barack Obama 4-5-2012
Hundreds of bills have passed out of Congress and been found unconstitutional,overturned by the Supreme Court,since Marbury V. Madison established in 1803 the Supreme Court’s right of judicial review.
The Supreme Court has been the final arbiter of law,determining the constitutionality of laws passed by Congress for over two hundred years. There is no article or section in the Constitution which specifically bestows this power within the Court. Instead,Marbury was the court’s interpretation of the Constitution;furthermore,the legal precedent it set in that decision still stands as good law today.
This is not the first time Mr. Obama has attempted to re-write history to his liking. The difference here lay in the fact that the media is in a feeding frenzy over this one.
The day following this massive falsehood,April 2nd,Eric Holder was ordered to address Obama’s statements by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, forcing the administration to publicly acknowledge the law established in Marbury.
Attorney General Eric Holder stated in the department’s court ordered response:“The Department has not in this litigation,nor in any other litigation of which I am aware,ever asked this or any other Court to reconsider or limit long-established precedent concerning judicial review of the constitutionality of federal legislation.” Even the Attorney General of the United States is hanging Obama out to dry on this issue.
Marbury V. Madison is not just an elephant in the room;it’s more like M-1/A-2 tank running flat out,but not for the reasons most immediately apparent. What is missing from this conversation,so ravenously devoured by the press,is this:Marbury was decided in 1803,it’s has been cited hundreds of times. It has never been overturned. The Attorney General of the United States affirms that it is good law. There is absolutely no question it is binding law,so commonplace it wasn’t even a discussion piece outside first year law school until the president tried to undo it in a press conference.
So far,so good,but what’s missing here?
If Marbury has never been overturned and is binding law with decades of citable history behind it,what makes it different from a case decided in 1875 which has also never been overturned and has been cited to for decades?
Nothing. They are both still law.
Minor V. Happersett in 1875 decided that Ms. Virginia Minor did not have the right to vote. While originally a Women’s Suffrage (voting) case,the Court in Minor interpreted the Constitution,determining that citizenship itself did not give right to vote,unequivocally stating in the final paragraph of the decision:“Being unanimously of the opinion that the Constitution of the United States does not confer the right of suffrage upon any one” –Minor V. Happersett (88 U.S. 162).
Constitutional Amendments against discrimination preventing a person from voting based on race (15th),sex (19th) and age (26th).,are taken for granted as being a constitutional rights to vote;yet in reality,there is no constitutionally protected “right” to vote (there are amendments against discrimination.)
To re-state this immeasurably important distinction,there is nothing in the Constitution which gives Americans the right to vote;instead,the Constitution eliminates circumstances such as gender and race from preventing voting. This is a legal distinction perhaps only a lawyer can properly love,yet the fact remains that the difference between the two is as great as the difference between lead and gold.
This is why the Minor Case has never been overturned;its conclusion is a statement of fact. Because it has never been overturned,the basic definitions of citizenship made in Minor still apply today because they are the independent grounds upon which the court made its decision.
To use a metaphor,‘The light bulb turned on because there is electricity. Electricity is the flow of electrons in a current which heats a wire making a light bulb glow.’ The definition of electricity is the independent ground upon which we can say the light bulb turned on.
This is not an issue of dictionary semantics or the meaning of words changing over time. The Minor court defined natural born citizenship as part of its independent ground for deciding the case,making it a part of the “holding”–for deciding the case as it did. “Citizenship does not give the right to vote. Citizens are…”These definitions were codified in law which,like those made in Marbury V. Madison,makes them inviolate.
The court in 1875 chose to define through its specific wording what natural born citizens were and still are today,just as in 1803 it decided the right of judicial review lay with the Supreme Court and nowhere else.
Illegal governments do illegal things
Why is the Minor case relevant in 2012 as it applies to the federal government breaking laws left and right?
The answer is not only insidiously dangerous,but terribly simple. The man at the head of that government is there illegally. How can this be? Because Minor V. Happersett is still law,it has not been overturned any more than Marbury V. Madison has.
“At common-law,with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar,it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves,upon their birth,citizens also. These were natives,or natural-born citizens,as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [p168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts,but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens.” Minor V. Happersett (88 U.S. 162)
The Court did not need to decide if Virginia Minor was a citizen because she was obviously a natural born citizen,born in the United States to two parents who were its citizens. The Minor case instructs clearly and concisely that those not born to two citizen parents will have doubts cast on their citizenship status,which in some circumstances,such as qualification under Article 2 Section 1 of the United States Constitution,will demand answers.
Simple logic tells us that where there is doubt about something,proofs must be offered to confirm its status. The proof offered by Barack Obama of his Natural Born Citizenship and placed by him on the White House website has been found to be a “probable forgery” by Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County,Arizona,in a legitimate law enforcement action undertaken at the written insistence of the Citizens of Maricopa County and presented to them in person on March 31,2012. The Sheriff is a five time,popularly elected law enforcement official who has served 20 years in that office.
This is the M-1/A-2 tank roaring through the room. If Marbury V. Madison is still law,so too is Minor V. Happersett.
If Barack Obama was completely wrong to state:“…the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected congress…”,then he is equally incorrect to claim Natural Born Citizenship because he was not “born in a country of parents who were its citizens.” He has offered no legitimate proof that he could be a citizen;his father was a British subject of Kenya and was never a citizen of the United States. What proof Obama has offered has been proven a forgery by law enforcement officials.
The simplest of conclusions is unavoidable:Illegal governments do illegal things. Expect nothing less.
Mrs. Cotter is a senior at American Military University,recipient of the Outstanding Student Essay of 2009,a member of Delta Epsilon Tau and Epsilon Pi Phi Academic Fraternities and on the Dean’s and President’s Lists for academic achievement. She has published at American Thinker,Examiner.com,Accuracy in Media,Family Security Matters,Post and Email,English Pravda,Tea Party Tribune,Patriot Action Network,and The Western Center for Journalism.
The author can be contacted at cotter.d.c@gmail.com,or at DiannaCotter.com
March 2nd, 2013 @ 5:54 pm
Bipartisan House Majority Votes to Hold Holder in Criminal Contempt https://shar.es/jwScj via @sharethis
March 2nd, 2013 @ 5:55 pm
Court says Obama appointments violate constitution
Email this Story
Jan 25, 7:11 PM (ET)
By SAM HANANEL
(AP) Richard Cordray stands left as President Barack Obama announces in the State Dining Room of the…
Full Image
Google sponsored links
Repeal Obamacare? – Should Congress Repeal Obama’s Policies? Vote Here Now.
http://www.newsmax.com/surveys
“What Democrats Hide:” – Find out what the democrats don’t want you to know. Read this now.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com
WASHINGTON (AP) – President Barack Obama violated the Constitution when he bypassed the Senate last year to appoint three members of the National Labor Relations Board, a federal appeals court ruled Friday in a far-reaching decision that could severely limit a chief executive’s powers to make recess appointments.
The decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit marked a victory for Republicans and business groups critical of the labor board. If it stands, it could invalidate hundreds of board decisions over the past year, including some that make it easier for unions to organize.
When Obama filled the vacancies on Jan. 4, 2012, Congress was on an extended holiday break. But GOP lawmakers gaveled in for a few minutes every three days just to prevent Obama from making recess appointments. The White House argued that the pro forma sessions – some lasting less than a minute – were a sham.
The court rejected that argument, but went even further, finding that under the Constitution, a recess occurs only during the breaks between formal year-long sessions of Congress, not just any informal break when lawmakers leave town. It also held that presidents can bypass the Senate only when administration vacancies occur during a recess.
White House press secretary Jay Carney said the administration strongly disagrees with the decision and that the labor board would continue to conduct business as usual, despite calls by some Republicans for the board members to resign.
“The decision is novel and unprecedented,” Carney said. “It contradicts 150 years of practice by Democratic and Republican administrations.”
Under the court’s decision, 285 recess appointments made by presidents between 1867 and 2004 would be invalid.
The Justice Department hinted that the administration would ask the Supreme Court to overturn the decision, which was rendered by three conservative judges appointed by Republican presidents. “We disagree with the court’s ruling and believe that the president’s recess appointments are constitutionally sound,” the statement said.
The court acknowledged that the ruling conflicts with what some other federal appeals courts have held about when recess appointments are valid, which only added to the likelihood of an appeal to the high court.
“I think this is a very important decision about the separation of powers,” said Carl Tobias, a constitutional law professor at Virginia’s University of Richmond. “The court’s reading has limited the president’s ability to counter the obstruction of appointments by a minority in the Senate that has been pretty egregious in the Obama administration.”
The ruling also threw into question the legitimacy of Obama’s recess appointment of Richard Cordray to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Cordray’s appointment, made on the same date, has been challenged in a separate case.
Carney insisted the court’s ruling affects only a single case before the labor board and would have no bearing on Cordray’s appointment. Obama on Thursday renominated Cordray for the job.
The case challenging the recess appointments was brought by Noel Canning, a Washington state bottling company that claimed an NLRB decision against it was not valid because the board members were not properly appointed. The D.C. Circuit panel agreed.
Obama made the recess appointments after Senate Republicans blocked his choices for an agency they contended was biased in favor of unions. Obama claims he acted properly because the Senate was away for the holidays on a 20-day recess. The Constitution allows for such appointments without Senate approval when Congress is in recess.
But during that time, GOP lawmakers argued, the Senate technically had stayed in session because it was gaveled in and out every few days for so-called pro forma sessions.
GOP lawmakers used the tactic – as Democrats had done in the past – specifically to prevent the president from using his recess power to install members to the labor board and the consumer board. They had also vigorously opposed the nomination of Cordray.
The three-judge panel flatly rejected arguments from the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, which claimed that the president has discretion to decide that the Senate is unavailable to perform its advice and consent function.
“Allowing the president to define the scope of his own appointment power would eviscerate the Constitution’s separation of powers,” Chief Judge David Sentelle wrote in the 46-page ruling. He was appointed by President Ronald Reagan.
The court ruled that during one of those pro forma sessions on Jan. 3, 2012, the Senate officially convened its second session of the 112th Congress, as required by the Constitution.
Sentelle’s opinion was joined by Judge Thomas Griffith, appointed to the court by President George W. Bush, and Karen LeCraft Henderson, who was appointed by President George H.W. Bush.
“With this ruling, the D.C. Circuit has soundly rejected the Obama administration’s flimsy interpretation of the law, and (it) will go a long way toward restoring the constitutional separation of powers,” said Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah.
GOP House Speaker John Boehner welcomed the ruling as “a victory for accountability in government.”
If the ruling stands, it would invalidate more than 600 board decisions issued over the past year. It also would leave the five-member labor board with just one validly appointed member, effectively shutting it down. The board is allowed to issue decisions only when it has at least three sitting members.
Obama used the recess appointment to install Deputy Labor Secretary Sharon Block, union lawyer Richard Griffin and NLRB counsel Terence Flynn to fill vacancies on the labor board, giving it a full contingent for the first time in more than a year. Block and Griffin are Democrats, while Flynn is a Republican. Flynn stepped down from the board last year.
All three vacancies on the labor board had been open for months before Obama acted to fill them.
Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa called the ruling “a radical departure from precedent” and argued that Obama had no choice but to act.
“Throughout his presidency, Republicans have employed unprecedented partisan delay tactics and filibusters to prevent confirmation of nominees to lead the NLRB, thus crippling the board’s legal authority to act,” Harkin said.
If Obama’s recess appointment of Cordray to the newly created consumer board is eventually ruled invalid, it could nullify all the regulations the consumer board has issued, many of which affect the mortgage business.
—
Follow Sam Hananel on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamHananelAP
Google sponsored links
Mirena Lawsuit – Free Case Evaluation Suffered From Mirena IUD Use?
http://www.MirenaLawsuit2013.com
Public Arrest Records – 1) Enter a Name & Search for Free. 2) View Background Check Instantly.
InstantCheckmate.com
Exercise Your Brain – Games You Didn’t Know Existed to Fight Brain Decline and Aging.
http://www.lumosity.com
March 2nd, 2013 @ 5:57 pm
INFILTRATED NATION: OBAMA’S EXACT VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION- WHER… https://www.infiltratednation.com/2012/09/obamas-exact-violations-of-constitution.html?spref=tw
March 2nd, 2013 @ 6:03 pm
Oath Keepers:We Can Legally File Charges Against Obama https://www.westernjournalism.com/oath-keepers-we-can-legally-file-charges-against-obama/ via @WestJournalism
March 2nd, 2013 @ 6:04 pm
National Labor Racket https://shar.es/jwViO via @sharethis
March 2nd, 2013 @ 6:04 pm
Video: Rush On Obama’s Experience With Drugs https://awe.sm/bDbzL via @BeforeItsNews
March 2nd, 2013 @ 6:05 pm
Rush Limbaugh on Obama’s experience with weed and other drugs: https://youtu.be/d0IAg0GaTQE via @youtube
March 2nd, 2013 @ 6:06 pm
RealClearPolitics Video – Sununu: Obama “Wallowed In Chicago” With Felons Like Rezko https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/07/16/sununu_obama_wallowed_in_chicago_with_felons_like_rezko.html
March 2nd, 2013 @ 6:07 pm
Obama Undeterred by GOP Complaints About Air Force One – NationalJournal.com https://www.nationaljournal.com/whitehouse/obama-undeterred-by-gop-complaints-about-air-force-one-20120712#.UTKwal59eEE.twitter
March 2nd, 2013 @ 6:09 pm
Every Single One: The Politicized Hiring of Eric Holder’s Criminal Section https://pjmedia.com/blog/every-single-one-the-politicized-hiring-of-eric-holder%e2%80%99s-criminal-section/ via @PJMedia_com
March 2nd, 2013 @ 7:03 pm
All the radio talk show hosts are compromised, they are kept a very tight and short leash.
March 2nd, 2013 @ 7:24 pm
I am a Freemason, we are not evil and we are fighting to PREVENT the creation of a global government. To claim that most judges and politicians are Freemasons is to repeat a patently absurd fallacy. “0” DOES NOT BELONG TO ANY PROPERLY CHARTERED MASONIC LODGE, HIS INFORMATION DOES NOT APPEAR ANYWHERE IN OUR MEMBERSHIP FILES. WE HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH HIM and WE DO NOT IN ANY WAY ENDORSE or SUPPORT HIM, SO STOP ALREADY!
If he belongs to a Prince Hall Lodge, he is NOT a Freemason because that group lost its
charter (due to inexcusable behavior) over 150 years ago. NO member of a PROPERLY CHARTERED LODGE is allowed to associate with or even so much as speak one word to a member of Prince Hall. Before someone starts with the often repeated whopper “You don’t know what REALLY goes on because you’re just a low ranking porch mason” nonsense – FYI lodge degrees END at 33*, there are NO higher degrees within ANY lodge and NOTHING is “secret” or “occult,”
EVERYTHING we do and say during lodge ceremonies is readily avaiable in printed form to any member of the general public through any bookstore. There is no reasonable excuse for anyone to continue repeating those tired old worn out lies about Freemasons…
March 2nd, 2013 @ 7:45 pm
Armed Services Chair: Never Seen Such Lack of ‘Truth-Telling’ from Commander-in-Chief… https://redflagnews.com/headlines/armed-services-chair-never-seen-such-lack-of-truth-telling-from-commander-in-chief
March 2nd, 2013 @ 7:49 pm
Anyone is welcome to search “Knight Templar Magazine”, click on the first result, and read our monthly newsletter. We are, in the truest sense, Knights and we have been fighting against Islam for nearly a thousand years. We have not had any connection to the Catholic church since 1312 and we have never been an evil or Satanic organization.
March 2nd, 2013 @ 8:15 pm
All these official’s and judges have been compromised its up to the patriotic citizens in this country to start a purge of the corrupted official criminals
March 2nd, 2013 @ 8:33 pm
To anyone concerned: Due to the fact that ones
in authority abuse their power and oath by not acting on evidence presented, perhaps it is time to file a complaint with the International Common Law of Justice. This
court takes action when crimes are comitted by
those in authority. Please check out their web-site and see results of cases that seemed impossible against the powerful.
Glen
March 2nd, 2013 @ 8:53 pm
cant we the people fire congress and our government for not doing they jobs we the people tax payers want our rights back we must stand up just like ise land and fire them all they want to fdo this to our nation then we fire them we the people pay them to work for us time we stand up and fire them now
March 2nd, 2013 @ 11:08 pm
Good evening, Orly! I came across a very interesting article and video from World Net Daily dated 7/1/2011, titled “What Did Congress Know About Natural-Born Citizen”?? From what I read, there were 8 attempts by congress members (mostly Democrats), from 2003 to 2008, who tried to change the ‘natural-born’ rule when they found out that Obama was running for President back in 2007. There’s a video included within this article…please view if you haven’t already! Keep up the good work, Orly and may God continue to bless you in your untiring efforts to expose the TRUTH!! https://www.wnd.com/2011/07/317705/
March 3rd, 2013 @ 3:01 am
I do not believe this is a real court with any real powers. this is like the citizens grand jury, where a few citizens meet and issue an indictment, but every DA, AG, US Attorney and judge throws this indictment in the garbage. You need actual trials with verdicts and sheriffs, police or militia arresting people based on these verdicts. I did not see this happening with either “international common law of Justice” or citizen Grand Juries
March 3rd, 2013 @ 3:22 am
WARNING!!!
2 Billion Rounds of Ammunition is being STOCK PILED by Our Government. It has been SECRETLY puchased with OUR TAX DOLLARS, without our knowledge or consent. Because We The People, are the ones paying for that Ammunition, that Ammunition belongs to US.
We need to demand that the US Government now place that Ammunition under the direct control of the US Tax Payers, since we are the ones who were forced to purchase that Ammo without our knowledge or consent, and since our Government CLEARLY CANNOT BE TRUSTED.
Perhaps we should start a petition demanding that the RIGHTFUL OWNERS OF THE AMMUNITION (the American People) have access to that Ammunition and control over it, since that AMMUNITION RIGHTFULLY BELONGS TO US.
March 3rd, 2013 @ 10:26 am
Get it started bloodless coup and I’ll be glad to go sign it and pass it around!!
March 3rd, 2013 @ 7:36 pm
Yoel, yes Obama is a freemason. “One of their most famous members, and also a 32nd degree Prince Hall Mason, became a US presidential candidate for 2008. His name is Barack Hussein Obama.”
December 28, 2007
Holly McQueen/The Register
Barack Obama, speaking at the Scottish Rite Masonic Center in Des Moines on Thursday, criticized other Democrats’ votes to authorize the war in Iraq.
Written by Dzenan Causevic
Prince Hall is a first black masonic lodge in the US, named by its founder and master who was the most famous black individual in the Boston area during the American Revolution and through the turn of the nineteenth century.
Prince Hall was the slave of a Boston leather-dresser named William Hall in the late 1740s, who earned his freedom on April 9, 1770, as reward for 21 years of steadfast service. Prince Hall and 14 other free black men, in and around Boston area, approached a British army lodge of Freemasons attached to the 38th Foot Regiment, stationed near Boston. Hall and the others were initiated into the lodge on March 6, 1775. The regiment withdrew from the area a short time later, and Sergeant John Batt, who had been in charge of the initiation, issued a limited permit on March 17 allowing the group certain Masonic privileges as well as permission to meet as a lodge.
There are divisions of freemasons and when you get up to 32 or 33, then you will find out the true meaning of being one and it’s not good.
March 6th, 2013 @ 8:47 pm
A 32d Order Free and Accepted Mason killed my dog. Freemasons killed Jesus. Wake up, Patriots!