OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


Examiner: On Feb. 4, California’s Fourth District Court of Appeals reinstated a birther case against President Barack Obama after a lower court ordered its dismissal last year. FindLaw, one of the largest legal search engines, reported Monday’s surprising decision

Posted on | February 5, 2013 | 25 Comments

by Marv Dumon | Examiner

 
On Feb. 4, California’s Fourth District Court of Appeals reinstated a birther case against President Barack Obama after a lower court ordered its dismissal last year. FindLaw, one of the largest legal search engines, reported Monday’s surprising decision.
 
https://www.examiner.com/article/obama-birther-case-appeals-court-reinstates-case-against-president

Comments

25 Responses to “Examiner: On Feb. 4, California’s Fourth District Court of Appeals reinstated a birther case against President Barack Obama after a lower court ordered its dismissal last year. FindLaw, one of the largest legal search engines, reported Monday’s surprising decision”

  1. Daniel Feldman, PhD
    February 5th, 2013 @ 6:25 am

    You do understand that, with good reason, you’re no longer welcomed in what we used to call “polite society,” don’t you?

  2. G Michael Cleland
    February 5th, 2013 @ 6:36 am

    God bless you Orly and your family for their understanding and support. You are one of the few true patriots.

    KEEP AT IT. WE MUST PREVAIL FOR THE SAKE OF THE REPUBLIC!

  3. David Milberg
    February 5th, 2013 @ 8:42 am

    Heads up Orly! A lot of mistakes in that Examiner article.

  4. Codetrader
    February 5th, 2013 @ 9:41 am

    Please invite your friends and family to support Orly and us.

    copy and paste this entire comment into forums and in the comment sections of Internet Articles.

    Posting an ad at your local Craigslist is working. Make up a great title for the ad.

    It takes us all to make this happen.

    Justice John Roberts is going to review a case on Feb 15th regarding Obama’s use of a fake SS#.

    The case review is real:

    https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm

    We do not think Roberts will act so we are demanding that Congress take action.

    Over 24,978 Letters and Emails Sent So Far.

    https://www.petition2congress.com/9026/start-immediate-investigation-barack-obamas-use-forged-ids-ct-ssn/

  5. winnybar
    February 5th, 2013 @ 11:05 am

    California has always had the most progressive courts.
    The jury is in on Land. All of his cases show poor writing ability using broken English continually. Usually a foreigner’s writing is better than their speaking. The thing to look for is the presence of complex sentences beginning with although and since. And is common.

    American white men are raised to be gentlemen and American woman are raised to be ladies both raised to be fair with other people.

    Land is neither a gentleman nor fair. He jailed a drug criminal for 110 months for possession of 500 grams. The people that should be jailed are the users.

  6. Donna
    February 5th, 2013 @ 11:25 am

    Orly, Something was done in 1961 to make this pRESIDENCY a reality. In 1961 when his “birth announcement” was announced on local news programs–Someone in the crowd surrounding the reporter said….”one Day he will be president” I watched it! NO ONE believed he was born in Hawaii then either!!!!

  7. Prayful Hands
    February 5th, 2013 @ 12:22 pm

    This is great news, Orly. Maybe a twist of fate?

  8. BOPE
    February 5th, 2013 @ 1:37 pm

    Refuse to Recuse
    Elena Kagan under spotlight for Obama admin work on NLRB

    Elena Kagan / AP
    BY: Bill McMorris
    February 5, 2013 8:59 am
    Critics of President Barack Obama’s recess appointments are calling on Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan to recuse herself from a potential Supreme Court hearing on the matter.

    The Chamber of Commerce raised the prospect of recusal, citing then-solicitor general Kagan’s defense of President Obama’s recess appointments in a previous case regarding the composition of the National Labor Relations Board.

    The Supreme Court invalidated more than 600 NLRB decisions in the June 2010 case New Process Steel v. NLRB because the board had been issuing decisions with only two members. Kagan defended Obama’s approach to board composition and recess appointments in several briefs, writing in April 2010 that the court “would significantly burden the rights protected” by the National Labor Relations Act if it decided against the administration.

    The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in January ruled in Noel Canning v. NLRB that Obama violated the Constitution when he appointed Richard Griffin and Sharon Block to the board without Senate confirmation while the upper legislative chamber was in pro forma session. Legal experts predict the case will end up in the Supreme Court.

    The Chamber of Commerce, which filed amicus briefs in the case, pointed out that Kagan pledged to recuse herself from any case “in which I have signed any kind of brief” during her 2010 Senate confirmation hearings. The associate justice has recused herself on previous cases, including the 2011 challenge to Arizona’s strict immigration laws, because of her work as solicitor general.

    Leslie W. Abramson, a legal ethics professor at the University of Louisville, said the chamber’s call falls short of existing legal precedent for recusal, pointing to the late-Chief Justice William Rehnquist’s refusal to step down from ruling on the constitutionality of a law he had praised in a Senate committee before joining the court.

    “As Rehnquist wrote, nobody comes to the court tabula rasa,” Abramson said. “Something a sitting judge has done in a prior life being used to recuse the justice in pending case before the court is a high threshold [to clear].”

    Glenn Taubman, an attorney with the National Right to Work Legal Foundation, which also filed an amicus brief in Noel Canning, said Kagan should examine carefully her previous recess appointment work in making her decision.

    “It certainly sounds reasonable that she would have to consider recusal, given the active role she took on recess appointments in New Process Steel and her opinion on what constitutes a proper recess appointment,” he said.

    This entry was posted in Big Labor, Obama Administration and tagged Elena Kagan, nlrb, Supreme Court. Bookmark the permalink.

    https://freebeacon.com/refuse-to-recuse/

  9. steve
    February 5th, 2013 @ 2:30 pm

    God bless you, Orly. I applaud your efforts to get to the truth of our illegal “president”. Given the hold our usurper in chief has on the media, his adoring crowds of low-information voters, liberals, felons, illegal immigrants, crooked politicians (and judges), dead people, and other equally unqualified “voters”….it seems unlikely that the truth will prevail in the US court system. It’s obvious that our country is being stolen from hard-working, honest, patriotic Americans. Voter fraud was rampant in the 2012 “election”. America is in trouble. obama is a traitor….at least he would be if he were real….as it is, he is public enemy #1 and I hope he hangs for his evil deeds.

  10. Al K. Halick
    February 5th, 2013 @ 3:03 pm

    Checkmate!

  11. truly
    February 5th, 2013 @ 3:18 pm

    #6 – Donna – –
    why do you take up space here with such a silly statement?
    Please do not respond.

  12. Hunk
    February 5th, 2013 @ 6:25 pm

    Daniel Feldman, Piled High and Deeper. you are an ignorant chump! Please go away and play with your Obama doll.

  13. Andrea
    February 6th, 2013 @ 5:54 am

    Concerning the “polite society” as referenced by neurosurgeon, Dr. Daniel Feldman, I suppose it depends on your definition of polite. If polite refers to ignoring the fact that our president lied to constituents about many things besides possibly his identity, then you can keep your “polite society”. This is a man in the most powerful seat in the world using drones to kill his own citizens, yet those who feigned outrage at water boarding techniques used by the previous administration are silent. Is this your polite society, sir? The man employing these drones is the same hypocrite who said, “Today we are engaged in a deadly global struggle for those who would intimidate, torture, and murder people for exercising the most basic freedoms. If we are to win this struggle and spread those freedoms, we must keep our own moral compass pointed in a true direction.” How do you politely ignore the blatant hypocrisy of that statement?

    Having said all of that, the man is a fraud. He has used the name Soetoro and Obama. He has a Connecticut Social Security number when he was born in Hawaii. What is so impolite about demanding that the leader of our great nation adhere to the same rules that we expect of every citizen in this country? Shame on you, Dr. Feldman for using ridicule as a last ditch effort since you cannot possibly explain how these things are legitimate and legal. I would think that a man of your intellect and science background understands that you need to put emotion aside and look at the facts. If you can do that, the facts are startling. I was not particularly pulled in at first, either. Please take this challenge and do not let your politics rule your reasoning in this matter. Ask yourself, how does one obtain a Connecticut SS # attached to someone else’s name? Just start there. That’s all I ask.

  14. Russell Bennett
    February 6th, 2013 @ 10:27 am

    If the Supreme Court finds a way to avoid a decesion What will that do to the Court.I can’t believe anyone will have any respect for the court if the President can bullie them around again.

  15. Russell Bennett
    February 6th, 2013 @ 10:27 am

    If the Supreme Court finds a way to avoid a decesion What will that do to the Court.I can’t believe anyone will have any respect for the court if the President can bullie them around again.

  16. TJ Marvin
    February 6th, 2013 @ 1:24 pm

    truly-Troll of the day!

  17. taino21
    February 6th, 2013 @ 1:56 pm

    Daniel Feldman, a polite society is an armed society, but, your fearless leaders are trying to take the 2 amendment down. Oh!! but, we have the ninth amendment, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” Even if they take the second away, we still have the right to bear arms. Oh!! what does the tenth says? “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.” You are not talking to a bunch of uneducated obots in here!

  18. Hunk
    February 6th, 2013 @ 4:28 pm

    Thank you, taino21. Obviously, Piled High and Deeper Feldman is an Educated Idiot. He should keep to kissing O-Bozos assets.

  19. TJ Marvin
    February 6th, 2013 @ 4:57 pm

    Hunk 😆

  20. Kathy F
    February 7th, 2013 @ 7:30 am

    The latest problem Obama now has is the drone killing overseas. I have found an article this morning stating that VA is considering charging Obama with the Death Penalty murder for the overseas drone killings of American citizens. He may have bigger fish to fry than even your cases right now.

    We can only pray this is true. Just think of the scene in Congress if this happens!!

    God Bless you, you are making progress.

    Kathy F.

  21. Francisco
    February 7th, 2013 @ 12:26 pm

    Maybe the judges in this country are finally waking up to the magnitude of the fraud committed by Soetoro on the american people.
    Too much information, too many pending suits, too much rumbling in the blogosphere, too many protesters, and too much evidence available in the Internet, might have finally turned the tide in your favor, Orly.

  22. js/js
    February 7th, 2013 @ 2:21 pm

    No doubt. Therefore: “Book Him, Danno!!!”

  23. JERRY
    February 7th, 2013 @ 8:53 pm
  24. JERRY
    February 7th, 2013 @ 9:15 pm

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyyHegP255gDr. Benjamin S. Carson at National Prayer Breakfast

  25. James
    February 8th, 2013 @ 6:33 pm

    What Donna does not get is the fact it’s a big deal just to be an american citizen. That’s the reason for all of the effort. The left seem to have little minds. They just can’t seem to grasp the big picture here.

Leave a Reply