Posted on | August 10, 2009 | 6 Comments
|
Dear Newsmax Reader:
Please find below a special message from our sponsor, The Patriot Depot. They have important information to share with you. Thank you.
Newsmax.com |
Sign The ‘STOP OBAMACARE’ PETITION Before It Is Too Late!
Signatures will be delivered to Congress after the August Reccess…
PATRIOT UPDATE FEATURED HEADLINE:
Request for Authentication of Obama’s Alleged Kenyan Birth Certificate…
|
California attorney Orly Taitz, who has filed a number of lawsuits demanding proof of Barack Obama’s eligibility to serve as president, has released a copy of what purports to be a Kenyan certification of birth and has filed a new motion in U.S. District Court for its authentication.
This document purports to be a Kenyan certification of birth for Barack Obama, allegedly born in Mombasa, Kenya, in 1961
The document lists Obama’s parents as Barack Hussein Obama and Stanley Ann Obama, formerly Stanley Ann Dunham, the birth date as Aug. 4, 1961, and the hospital of birth as Coast General Hospital
in Mombasa, Kenya. CONTINUE READING THIS ARTICLE & SEE LARGER PHOTO ON THE |
|
|
|
Comments
August 10th, 2009 @ 8:50 pm
This should be a red flag, that Birth Certificates can be forged with ease.
Hell I even show you how to do it in under 5 min.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bd9K2Q3EbVQ
So what makes the Hawaiian Certification more believable, especially since there are three different versions of it posted on the net.
The Department of Justice needs to investigate this. Barack Obama is showing all the signs by failing to release any documents regarding his past, as using forged papers to gain employment. That should flag, Immigration and Naturalization.
The Senate has to know Obama is a fraud and are covering it up.
SR511 is an illegal “Gentlemen’s Agreement”
https://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2009/08/10/senate-resolution-511-and-what-it-really-means/
August 10th, 2009 @ 11:59 pm
With no legal definition of ‘Natural Born Citizen’ and no Constitution provisions for becoming one, if Osama Bin Laden, Fidel Castro or Kim Jong Ill were to become a 14 yr resident and show themselves to be over the age of 35, they could be eligible to be President by simply declaring themselves a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ as Obama has done. Showing Obama to have been born in Kenya is only important in that it is ASSUMNED that being born on U.S. soil is a requirement. But there is NO legal definition requiring jus soli for ‘Natural Born’ because there is NO definition AT ALL for the category of citizenship. I was taught this assumption in grammar school that jus soli and two citizen parents was necessary to be a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ and I am sure I am not alone in remembering my social studies class. Minor v Happersett only refers to ‘citizenship’ and clearly states that ‘Natural Born Citizenship’ is NOT defined and that we must look elswhere to find a definition for it. but this has never been tested in a court and no legal determination or provision for the establishment of the status has been handed down. therefore a mere declaration of such is NOT against any LAW.
This matter needs to find its way into a courtroom and a definition established once and for all.
I do not believe a definition any less than jus soli with two citizen parents will ever be accepted by the American public for the obvious reason that Osama Bin Laden could marry a U.S. citizen and bear a child on U.S. soli and his son would be eligible for President. I know that I would protest any such definition designed to keep Obama in office.
August 11th, 2009 @ 2:21 am
That is the first article WND wrote about the Kenyan certification of registration. Did you notice the article says:
[[ WND was able to obtain other birth certificates from Kenya for purposes of comparison, and the form of the documents appear to be identical. ]]
https://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=105764
WND said the exact same thing in an article dated the 4th:
https://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=106016
August 11th, 2009 @ 3:08 am
Orly, I firmly believe your Kenyan Certified Copy of Registration of [Obama’s] Birth is authentic. MUCH evidence has been found that shows the Bomford CCRB is a hoax.
Look at posts 1444 and 1445 on this Free Republic page. The six layers strongly suggest that someone began with a basic South Australian CCRB form and covered specific sections of the form with different text, deriving the information from that posted in the Bomford family’s genealogy page. (Delete spaces so link will work):
ht tp :// ww w.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2307402/posts?q=1&;page=1401#1444
For a close-up of the third layer — the one that says “FATHER” — go to this Free Republic post no. 51:
ht tp :// ww w.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2307802/posts?page=51#51
The URL for the image itself is at:
ht tp :// img.photobucket.com/albums/v60/Finklestink/Fold.jpg
See that the word “FATHER” is straight, almost like floating above the fold’s crease in the page, and does NOT get distorted with the crease? That is more evidence that the Bomford CCRB is a hoax.
The logical conclusion is that someone, or a team, quickly created, or altered, the Bomford CCRB in order to make it appear to be authentic and thereby make the Kenyan CCRB appear to be fraudulently copied from the Bomford.
In fact, the allegedly fraudulent Bomford CCRB makes the Kenyan CCRB appear to be authentic.
And is it a coincidence that “the folks at Politjab who found the Bomford template now have found the spoofer”? Read this Free Republic post:
ht tp :// ww w.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2310979/posts
Don’t give up, Orly . . . RIGHT is on your side!
August 11th, 2009 @ 5:29 am
Orly, also remember that in two different articles, on two different dates, WorldNetDaily stated:
[[ WND was able to obtain other birth certificates from Kenya for purposes of comparison, and the form of the documents appear to be identical. ]]
ht tp ://w ww.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=105764
and
ht tp ://w ww.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=106016
Have you asked WND to show you those “identical” appearing documents?
August 11th, 2009 @ 10:02 am
I am behind Orly 100%.
May I ask what are the reasons confirming or for thinking that the 39 social security numbers all belonged to the same person, and that that person was Resident Obama?
I do notice the similarity of all the names, but is there other evidence on this? I recall this being touched upon somwhere, but I did not catch it.