Dear Orly,
Legal precedent? Our legal system and jurisprudence itself have been hi-jacked! What happened to logic and reason? How can ANY mere law or opinion possibly trump our nation’s constitution, the very authority under-lying EVERY law and ALL supposed precedent? By what authority is our nation’s actual constitution itself ever insufficient to justify opinions and rulings? Where is it written that there can be no more land-mark court decisions based solely on our nation’s constitution, but that all arguments must now cite previous opinions and rulings to provide legal cover? The claim that we must now have “precedent” is utterly absurd and flies in the very face of logic! If true, the first cases could and would never have been decided!
Legal precedent? Our legal system and jurisprudence itself have been hi-jacked! What happened to logic and reason? How can ANY mere law or opinion possibly trump our nation’s constitution, the very authority under-lying EVERY law and ALL supposed precedent? By what authority is our nation’s actual constitution itself ever insufficient to justify opinions and rulings? Where is it written that there can be no more land-mark court decisions based solely on our nation’s constitution, but that all arguments must now cite previous opinions and rulings to provide legal cover? The claim that we must now have “precedent” is utterly absurd and flies in the very face of logic! If true, the first cases could and would never have been decided!
Obama’s lawyers know that the evidence of his fake, computer-generated “birth certificate” and constitutional ineligibility to be POTUS is absolutely indisputable and utterly damning, as are the cover-up and the resolute and flat refusal of our courts and others in authority to deal with that evidence!
“At first, Obama’s attorney Tepper stated that there is a case that says that misprision of felony cannot be a predicate crime, then he corrected himself and said that there is no such case.”
I believe we have seen such grasping at straws before. It seems to me that Obama’s lawyers are very willing and very adept at inventing or twisting facts and law in order to make their case. I suspect that Tepper is seething with anger and resentment at being exposed and humiliated in open court before a watching world by someone he does not consider to be a “real” lawyer.
“On the issue of forgery of IDs, Tepper said that in RICO there has to be a forgery of federal IDs, birth certificate is a state ID and SSN is not considered an ID.”
This in itself is to me an ASTOUNDING admission! Note that Tepper does NOT deny that Obama’s “alleged birth certificate” and other documents were FORGED; only that they are not “valid” identification! Obama’s lawyer Alexandra Hill made a similar admission in Mario’s Purpura-Moran ballot challenge <http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/04/update-on-purpura-and-moran-new-jersey.html> when she stipulated that neither the court nor the state of New Jersey can rely on a mere computer-generated internet image of an alleged birth certificate as legally-admissible evidence of Obama’s true identity and place of birth AND, further, agreed that Obama has produced absolutely NO OTHER EVIDENCE regarding his place of birth! If I were judge Wingate, THAT admission ALONE would move me sua sponte to order full discovery!
I feel very badly about the abuse that has been heaped upon you. You have been on a legal and emotional roller-coaster, and you are much in my thoughts and prayers. I consider you a dear fellow-patriot and constitutionalist, and I greatly admire your love and sacrifice for our republic and its God-given freedoms, and your zeal for truth. May God give you much wisdom, grace and strength.
Karl
Post script: I have been unable to comment via your internet site.