Responding to a supporter Carol
Posted on | April 9, 2012 | 2 Comments
ch |
Submitted on 2012/04/09 at 9:45am
Couldn’t Sheriff Arpaio call a local grand jury to investigate the situation for Maricopa County, regardless of what forgery upper levels want to participate in? Isn’t this exactly what the citizen grand juries were formed for, when elected officials become the problem? A local grand jury could take it into court, work with the sheriff. They could have a trial and also share their information with every county sheriff across the country, so as many counties as wanted, could ban Obama from the ballot, and both he and anybody found to have participated in the forgery could be arrested by the sheriff if they enter that county. Isn’t that the way it works. The Supreme Court is a last resort, and people do not have to wait and be victimized by their own elected officials. I hope there are a lot of sheriffs who come on board and county by county, the DNC crime ring will be painted into a corner. Response from Orly to reader Carol. We tried citizen grand juries: simply bringing citizens together and holding hearings, however the District Attorneys, US attorneys and judges were not willing to consider any findings by the citizen grand juries. There are official grand juries. There are 3 types of them: a. county grand jury. They get the case for review from the District Attorney b. state grand jury. They get the case from the office of the Attorney General of the state c. federal grand jury. They get the case from the US attorney There are some states, where citizens can submit their complaints directly to the grand jury. There are instances of “runaway grand juries” who went against the DA. I do not know if in AZ citizens can submit the complaint directly to the grand jury. I do not know a rule, where a sheriff can submit a report directly to the grand jury. As far as I know, he has to go through the authorities, who of course can be a part of the corrupt establishment. As far as I know, the sheriff can submit his report to the District Attorney and the District attorney will forward to the grand jury. I believe he can also submit to the Attorney General, US attorney, Secretary of State, Governor, FBI and Congress and they need to run with it. That is why I am beating the drums of war and saying that he needs to submit the report before it is too late. In terms of arrest, he can arrest a person who is committing forgery and using forged documents. I am sure Sheriff Arpaio arrested numerous individuals, who came from Mexico and are using forged documents. Believe it or not, but Obama’s case is not any different from cases of illegal aliens from Mexico, who are using forged IDs. The only difference is that corrupt party bosses on both sides of the isle simply made a deal to look the other way. You need to urge Arpaio to act before it is too late |
Comments
2 Responses to “Responding to a supporter Carol”
Leave a Reply
April 9th, 2012 @ 12:48 pm
It is my understanding that Grand Juries do not hold trials but have investigative duties. They can conduct an all out investigation of anyone for anything; issue subpenas demanding anyone testify and to gather evidence. The evidence is kept confidential until it is presented as an indictment and as evidence at trial by a judge and possible jury.
So, this may be an excellent way to gather more info and put criminals and accomplices under oath, making them risk perjury.
April 9th, 2012 @ 12:55 pm
you are right. The problem is that the grand juries are oftne manipulated by the DAs and US attorneys to go in the “proper” direction, if you know what I mean. I am wondering, if someone reading this blog is serving now on a grand jury?