OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.
 -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.
 -- Mahatma Gandhi


Kip Wainscott and Mike Jablonski, attorneys for Barack Obama received subpoenas for their client to appear at trial as a witness in Taitz et al v Elections Commission and Sec of State of Indiana

Posted on | October 12, 2012 | 12 Comments

Important

Inbox
x
Orly Taitz orly.taitz@gmail.com
12:52 PM (0 minutes ago)

to bcc: kwainscott, bcc: michael.jablon., bcc: me
Dear Mr. Wainscott and Mr. Jablonski
Please, find attached a subpoena for your client to appear on October 22, 2012 10 am, at the hearing for a permanent injunction before Hon Superior Court Judge Sherry K. Reid
in Taitz, Swihart, Kesler, Ripley, Kern, Weyl v Elections Commission, Secretary of State
Respectfully,

Dr Orly TaitzESQ
29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
ph 949-683-5411  fax949-766-7603
IN Subpoena Barack Obama.jpg

Comments

12 Responses to “Kip Wainscott and Mike Jablonski, attorneys for Barack Obama received subpoenas for their client to appear at trial as a witness in Taitz et al v Elections Commission and Sec of State of Indiana”

  1. Freedom First
    October 12th, 2012 @ 12:19 pm

    Dr. Taitz, please help non-lawyers understand. Is there any weight of law to compel Obama to appear under your subpoena? I noticed the words “Hereby commanded to appear in court”. What happens if he doesn’t?, is there criminal implications for contempt of court? Is there any precedent for POTUS being subpoenaed in this fashion? Thanks for the clarification.

  2. ihveit
    October 12th, 2012 @ 12:36 pm

    am i wrong or is this the day of the debate? if so i have to wonder if this was deliberately done to give obummer an excuse to move it foreward to past the election?//

    and if so then after the election the judge can claim its to late…..

    i guess i am gun shy and starting to think like a liberal rat
    w

  3. Homeboy
    October 12th, 2012 @ 1:46 pm

    From what I remember, they forced a sitting president named Bill Clinton to appear in a case brought by Jenifer Flowers. As I remember, he was dis-bared for lying in that trial.
    So yes, a sitting president can be compelled to appear in court. Will Obama comply? He is such an arrogant bastard, that I doubt it, and they will let him get away with it.

  4. jobethian
    October 12th, 2012 @ 3:35 pm

    Homeboy, we cannot let “them” let Obama get away with this. We need to call and write and complain till we are noticed and heard.

  5. Real Lawyer
    October 12th, 2012 @ 7:57 pm

    President Obama will not appear at Orly’s hearing. Period.

  6. Factual Truth
    October 13th, 2012 @ 3:35 am

    The only way Barrack Hussein Obama is going to go into any Courtroom and come face to face with Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. is to be physically dragged into that courtroom.

    There is absolutely no way that a SUBPOENA is going to get him to just walk into a Courtroom and face Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.

    Barrack Hussein Obama knows that he would have to commit PERJURY and he AIN’T going to do that.

  7. FedupwDC
    October 13th, 2012 @ 7:42 am

    @ihveit: The debate is Tuesday, October 23rd so there is absolutely no reason he cannot show up on the 22nd.

  8. michaelsr
    October 13th, 2012 @ 10:47 am

    Dependent upon Orly’s success with individual state ballot challenges, I’d like to suggest an additional avenue of legal pursuit if she does not succeed.

    Orly ought to challenge the Electoral College with an injunction to prevent a vote to certify obama based upon the same legal principles she has used in the individual state ballot challenges.

    Go Orly !!!!

  9. Julia
    October 14th, 2012 @ 1:23 am

    Homeboy, sorry you are remembering it wrong. The case was Jones v. Clinton, and the court did not hold that a sitting President can be compelled to come to court. It held that his deposition can be taken, in Washington DC, working around the President’s schedule.

  10. Time to Go
    October 14th, 2012 @ 3:15 pm

    Tell O to bring his genealogy charts that shows he’s Kenyan royalty and an Indonesian prince, just as he said he was. We wouldn’t want his Highness to get slighted when it comes to his pedigree.

    Kristen Caldwell, who attended Punahou in Hawaii at the same time as Obama, said: “And he told us that his father was an Indonesian king and that he was a prince, and after he finished school he was going to go back, and he would be a ruler in Indonesia. And I absolutely believed him. I understand that he told his fifth-grade class that he was Kenyan royalty, but I never heard that story until years later. My sister and I remember very clearly that he was an Indonesian prince and that he would be going back there. So there was some reference to where he had come from, and the understanding was his family was there.”

    It’s long past time for the Indonesian prince to return to Indonesia as he said he would.

    https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/government-elections-politics/choice-2012/the-frontline-interview-kristen-caldwell/

  11. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 14th, 2012 @ 3:55 pm

    there was no motion to compel. I can proceed with him or without him

  12. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 14th, 2012 @ 4:43 pm

    fine with me. I provided him with a notice.

Leave a Reply