This makes no sense:in ongoing investigation you don’t talk at all. Giving press, conferences, selling books, but refusing to testify before the judge because of ongoing investigation means treating the audience as complete idiots
Posted on | April 2, 2012 | 18 Comments
Submitted on 2012/04/02 at 3:21am
From 1:47:00 to Approximately 1:49:00 it is explained that they have no intention of backing this information in court. The excuse given is “it’s an ongoing investigation…”. Sounds to me like it’s just a ruse to sell books.
Response from Orly
Yesterday, reportedly when asked why he is not willing to testify before the judge, Zullo stated that it is because the investigation is ongoing. (the video of the event is not available for some reason) He also stated that he wants to work on legislative option. This makes absolutely no sense. When the investigation is ongoing and police does not want to jeopardize the investigation, they do not talk at all. Arpaio and Zullo are talking and doing press conferences, WND publicity events, where they are raising donations through WND and promoting Joseph Farah’s WND and selling the book which was co-authored with Jerome Corsi, promoting Jerome Corsi and the book. They are not asked to reveal something new that they did not reveal before, which might jeopardize the investigation. They are asked to confirm to the judge under oath, what they already stated in two press conferences. To say that confirming under oath what they said in press conference is jeopardizing the investigation, makes as much sense as Obama posting his forgery on line, but refusing to present the original or a certified copy because of privacy concerns. What privacy? Jeopardize what? This is equal to treating the public as complete idiots.
Additionally, testifying under oath before the judge does not preclude the legislative effort. I traveled to AZ 4 times. I gave presentations to the tea party and met with the law makers there. I was assisting with the legislative push last year. It died when corrupt governor of AZ Jan Brewer refused to sign the bill. The Speaker of the House acted in unison with Brewer and cut the assembly short, so that the bill would not be reintroduced. This time there are less state reps and state senators willing to sign. Let’s suppose we push the bill through the house and state senate, what’s next? Do you believe Brewer will be less corrupt this year than the last year? This is not very likely. Even if Brewer signs, the bill is not likely to be effective for this election cycle. It takes long time to push the bill through the committees, 2 chambers of the state legislature an put it in front of the governor.
So the only way to stop the criminal now, is through the order by a judge. In order for a judge to rule on the evidence it has to be in front of him. Arpaio is saying that he is continuing his investigation. Let’s not forget that he and Zullo and his posse did not come up with any news evidence. 3 years ago I submitted to authorities the report about the selective service certificate fraud I received from a retired agent Steven Coffman. For a year I have been submitting to courts evidence of forgery in Obama’s long form BC. So why did it take a year to confirm evidence, which was readily available? Why Arpaio is not talking about the SSN fraud, which is the easiest to confirm and which is the most damning? Why Arpaio and Zullo are talking before crowds in publicity events, but are not willing to state the same before a judge?
I am very concerned about the fact that Arpaio is facing charges by the feds for civil rights violations and is supposed to respond before April 14th. Testimony in court is the ace in his deck. I am really concerned that there might be a quid pro quo, a deal where the feds will leave Arpaio alone, but under a condition that he and his assistants never testify in court and either do not submit an official report to the District Attorney or submit one with the understanding that it would never lead to any charges, meaning a report that will be shelved by the District Attorney or the judge.
Please, urge Arpaio and Zullo and members of their team to do something that really makes a difference: submit their report asap to the District Attorney and testify in court confirming what they already stated at their publicity events. We do not need to know the name of the forger in order to remove Obama from the ballot. It is irrelevant and can be prosecuted later. They simply need to confirm before the judge in court what they stated before, that the alleged birth certificate is a forgery.
Please, do not forget that they are not risking anything. They are acting as witnesses, who were simply called to testify. I am the one facing all the challenges as I am the plaintiff or an attorney for plaintiffs. Corrupt establishment attacked me before, a corrupt judge hit me with $20,000 sanctions, saying it was frivolous to challenge usurper Obama,I was defamed, slandered and it continues. I carry all the expenses. Please, see the notice sent to Zullo. I even offered to pay for his expenses. They do not have a legitimate excuse not to testify before a judge and not to confirm under oath what they stated at the publicity events before.
Additionally, you can go to the DA and grand jury and demand they act upon evidence that was already made public. If Arpaio reaches a quid pro quo deal with the feds, you can still act by asking the county state and federal grand juries to act. Grand juries, state representatives, District Attorneys and Attorney Generals have subpoena power. They can subpoena Obama and the director of Health of Hawaii and the commissioner of Social Security. Please, go to the grand juries, District Attorneys and sheriffs in every county around the country. We know the regime is corrupt, but we may have one decent grand jury somewhere, which will present the indictment of Obama to the judge. I am conducting multiple legal actions hoping for one honest decent judge. Please, act, don’t rely only on Arpaio. Please, help me bring the evidence to judges and courts. I. also, need an assistant to help me copy and ship documents to secretaries of state and AGs, I need members of the public to help cover the expenses of shipping the packages.
Notice to appear
Dear investigator Zullo,
please find a notice to appear at the court hearing in Jackson MS on April 16, 2012 in Taitz v Democratic party, Secretary of State of MS
Please, advise me if you need airfare and hotel covered
Dr Orly TaitzESQ
29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
ph 949-683-5411 fax949-766-7603
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
p. 949-683-5411 f 949-766-7603
IN THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
) Hon. R. Kenneth Coleman presiding
) Case #2012-107
Democratic Party of Mississippi )
Secretary of State of Mississippi )
Notice to appear as a witness
Investigator Mike Zullo is hereby noticed to appear as a witnessed at the hearing Orly Taitz v Democratic Party of Mississippi, Secretary of State of Mississippi.
Hearing will be conducted at the Hinds County Circuit Court, 316 S. President str. Jackson, Mississippi, 39201 on April 16, 2012, 9 am, in front of the special judge R. Kenneth Coleman appointed by the chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the state of Mississippi to hear the aforementioned case.
You are to provide testimony and any and all evidence related to investigation of elections fraud and forgery of the long form birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama, forgery of the Selective Service Certificate of Barack Hussein Obama and foreign national status of Barack Hussein Obama.
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ