OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

MS update

Posted on | March 24, 2012 | 3 Comments

Circuit Court Civil Case Detail
line

Case # 2012-107 Filed: 02/14/2012 Case Type: COMPLAINT
Judge GOWAN Closed:   District : 1
Style:    
  TAITZ ORLEY DR SELF REPRESENTED
     Vs
  DEMOCRAT PARTY OF MISSISSIPPI ET AL  
  SECRETARY OF STATE OF MISSISSIPPI  
LINE DATE EVENT DESCRIPTION Book – Page
1 02/14/2012 PETITION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RELIE
F
2 02/14/2012 COURT REGISTRY CHECK #1267 FOR $300 RECEIVED
AS BOND FROM DEFEND OUR FREEDO
M FOUNDATION
3 02/21/2012 MISC EMAILED ORDER APPOINTING
SPECIAL JUDGE TO ATTY OF
RECORD
4 02/21/2012 ORDER OF SUPREME COURT – R KENNETH C
OLEMAN APPOINTED SPECIAL JUDGE		 726-638 Document
5 02/28/2012 PAYMENT REC FROM DEFEND OUR FREEDOM FO
UNDATION
6 02/28/2012 SUMMONS ISSUED AND RET TO PL- NO COPIES OF CO
MPLAINT PROVIDED- COPY COST $2
88.00 PER COPY
7 03/01/2012 MOTION OF SECRETARY OF STATE TO DISMI
SS
HAROLD E PIZZETTA III, JUSTIN
8 03/01/2012 MISC BEGLEY, DR ORLY TAITZ
9 03/07/2012 MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION FOR DECLAR
ATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AN
D FOR SANCTIONS
10 03/07/2012 MISC KENNETH COLEMAN, ORLY TAITZ,HA
ROLD E PIZETTA, JUSTIN L MATHE
NY
11 03/15/2012 SUMMONS SENT SHERIFF’S OFFICE – ATTY C
HECK HINDS
12 03/15/2012 OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS, MOTIONFO
R SUMMARY AGENT SECT OF STATE,
MOTION TO RECUSE ATTY GENERAL
13 03/15/2012 MISC DR ORLY TAITZ, ATTY CC:ATTORNE
Y GENERAL,SAMUEL L BEGLEY
14 03/19/2012 OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS BY DEMOCR
ATIC PARTY OF MISSISSIPPI
DR ORLEY TAITZ,ATTY
15 03/23/2012 RESPONSE OF MS SECRETARY OF STATE IN OP
P TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY AND RE
SPONSE IN OPP TO MOTION TO REC
16 03/23/2012 MISC PIZETTA III, JUSTIN L MATHENY,
ATTYS CC: ORLY TAITZ, SAMUEL L
BEGLEY
17 03/23/2012 RESPONSE OF MS DEMOCRATIC PARTY EXE. CO
MMITTEE TO MOTION FOR SANCTION
S AND MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAIN
18 03/23/2012 MISC CC: ORLY TAITZ, HAROLD E PIZZE
TTA, JUSTIN L MATHENY
19 03/23/2012 MOTION IN LIMINE OF MS DEMOCRATIC PAR
TY EXE. COMMITTEE
20 03/22/2012 SUMMONS EX 3-19-12 ON SAM BEGLEY FOR
DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF MS
21 03/22/2012 SUMMONS EX 3-19-12 ON TOM RILEY FOR
SECRETARY OF STATE
Back     Search
    

Saturday, March 24, 2012       Contact Webmaster       Phone Numbers       Map to our Office
Copyright © 2012 Hinds County Board of Supervisors All rights
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

3 Responses to “MS update”

  1. William Reade
    March 24th, 2012 @ 3:46 pm

    It appears to me the defendants statement:

    Is without merit and inflammatory to say the least, as there were no decisions, all were
    dismissed by the members of the Judiciary without being heard on the merits. This lack
    of action by the Judiciary is termed “NONFEASANCE” on their part and according to
    Chief Justice John Marshall in Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264 (1821), was a
    United States Supreme Court decision most noted for John Marshall and the Court’s
    assertion of its power to review state supreme court decisions in criminal law matters
    when the plaintiff claims that their Constitutional rights have been violated. The
    Court had previously asserted a similar jurisdiction over civil cases involving American
    parties. Determined that court acting in a manner repugnant to the Constitution is
    committing treason; that a court seizing jurisdiction where they have none and
    failing to exercise jurisdiction where they should is likewise committing treason.

    The question is; “Is frivolous when a party has no hope of success” a prediction based on “Prior Knowledge” of the outcome, and the assurance that the court has full intention of again resorting to “Nonfeasance”

  2. Lisa
    March 24th, 2012 @ 6:26 pm

    Dr Orly,
    It is not clear to me how to order your video. The link goes to a contribution site with no explanation of how to get the videos.
    I would also like to know, does the video actually show the evidence depicting testimony against obama such as the BC being a fraud, and the other witnesses that were present?
    My mother does not have computer access, and has heard NOTHING about any of this, nothing!
    This is outrageous.
    She lives in Massachusetts, and is completely in the dark about this all. I tell her about it, let her listen over the phone to videos on the web, but sending her a dvd would be so much better then she can watch and see it all.
    I would like to send her your video if it has the actual testimony of the witnesses in Georgia.
    Is it possible to make it easier to order by adding a tab or link or something? I’ll bet your sales increase dramatically if you do.
    Lisa La
    pbpoa@yahoo.com/energetickidsmom@yahoo.com

  3. Lisa
    March 25th, 2012 @ 2:36 pm

    Dr Orly,
    Could you remove my emal from the above commment please? That was only for you.
    Thank you,
    Lisa

Leave a Reply