18 Responses to “Dem party answer to my motion”

1. Veritas
   March 24th, 2012 @ 4:04 pm

   They say “having been born in Hawaii” and is “therefore a NATURAL BORN citizen.”

   Isn’t that a SYLLOGISM?

   In any case, they ought to be ashamed of their legal counsel for such a messy response to you.

   They are scared that you are correct, and, of course, you ARE.

   Godspeed, Dr Orly.

2. winnybar
   March 24th, 2012 @ 4:15 pm

   THIS IS A WORLDWIDE CONSPIRACTY AGAINST AMERICA. There are no legal documents supporting the claim that Obama has a white mother and a black father.
   Not to mention all of the missing Obama records here are a few altered, substituted, forged records.
   1. Hawaii birth index altered with no Obama birth certificate attached
   2 Hawaii groom index altered with no Obama marriage certificate attached
   3. Hawaii bride index altered with no Dunham marriage certificate attached

   4. Dunham-Obama and Dunham-Soetoro divorce papers lack Dunham high school signatures similarity. Google Annwriting1 for the signatures.

   5. Hawaii Obama birth announcements inserted into public library newspaper microfilms.

   6. Hawaii Polk directory 1961-62 altered listing a 18 year old Dunham as a Obama in an ADULTS ONLY directory. Alleged Dunham father listed at the fake birth announcement address while Dunham is listed as renting. 1960 AND 1961 Honolulu city directories missing at the LDS genealogy archive.

   7. Seattle Polk directory 1961-62 lists an S Anna Obama as both renter and homeowner

   8. University of Hawaii computer database ENTERED to list a Spring 1960 Dunham attendance and no 1961 semester attendance. Dates of claimed Dunham degrees were received when she wasn’t in attendance.

   9. University of Washington computer database ENTERED to change Dunham to Obama and year of high school graduation from 1961 to 1960 and added a Russian language course from Hawaii Fall 1960.

   10. Dunham passport records lack legitimate Dunham signatures and photos with a likeness of Dunham.

   11. Indonesia school record substituted with a fake using English words for easy understanding as Indonesia uses its own language on its own documents.

   12. Alleged Obama birthdate August 4, 1961 forged on all documents and computer entries in spite of photoanalysis placing Obama at least 10 years older and Dunham’s Novermber 29, 1942 birthdate making her Class of 1961 and thus in Seattle on the alleged conception time.

   13. The White House Obama birth certificate lacking a legit Dunham signature and a legit birthdate for Old Obama.

   14. A brace of the forged, altered, substituted documents including the White House Obama birth certificate were made on the same circa 1961 Royal manual standard typewriter with the 12 point PICA font.

   15. The bogus Kenya Obama birth certificate lacking required signatures was made on the Royal typewriter. An operative claimed he paid $5000 to finesse that BC in Kenya of all places, on the other side of the world from Hawaii.

3. CrispinFetchit
   March 25th, 2012 @ 5:43 am

   Winnybar – what a comprehensive list of completely wingnut theories. You must have strained your brain cell.

4. Wayne
   March 25th, 2012 @ 7:43 am

   Whether or not Obama is a Citizen or not makes no difference because he is a Communist and he hates this nation and he is trying to destroy it piece by piece and you would have yo be blind not to see it.

5. Johan
   March 25th, 2012 @ 9:07 am

   The problem is that the recent Georgia judgement by Judge Malihi claims falsely that the President of the USA does not have to be born of both American parents to be a “natural born citizen”!
   As long as this Georgia judgement is not fully refuted through courts, people will keep claiming falsely (but “legally”) that a “natural born citizen” does not need to have both parents American citizens! When in fact the Constitution of the USA does require that both parents be American citizens in order for the President of the USA to be a “natural born citizen”.

6. steve
   March 25th, 2012 @ 1:24 pm

   @ winnybar

   let’s not forget about the ‘missing’ week on microfilm of INS flight logs coincidentally
   at time of usurpers birthdate!

   This together represents an avalanche of real evidence of a huge crime that’s completely protected by a criminal msm defensive shield. We need to legally implicate these msm co-conspirators head on!

7. Jim Fields
   March 25th, 2012 @ 1:57 pm

   Why is Judge Malihi still a judge if he will not up hold the constitution. You have to have both parents a American citizens to be a Natural born citizen. By Obama book, he says that his father is from Kenya and at no time was a America citizen. That makes Obama with a dual cirizenship and no way can a person with a dual citizenship be president. Judge took a oath to up hold the constitution, he should be remove from being a judge.

8. JAK
   March 25th, 2012 @ 4:04 pm

   I believe there has to be a lot of sorting out between fact and fiction as to the entire scenario of Obama’s history. However one thing I stand by is that world wide communism is and has been a festering sore for the USA since the days of President Wilson. That Chicago and Hawaii were/have been cesspools for communistic actions against the USA should not surprise people as to the nurturing of Obama. I’m sure Orly understands/realizes this scenario.

9. Ken B.
   March 25th, 2012 @ 5:11 pm

   Johan,

   So does Senate Resolution 511. Requires BOTH parents to be AMERICAN CITIZENS

10. Aufgebrachtes Wiesel
    March 26th, 2012 @ 12:54 am

    > no way can a person with a dual citizenship be president

    So JFK wasn’t legit? Or most of the Founders?

11. orly taitz
    March 26th, 2012 @ 1:07 am

    founders were grandfathered in for obvious reason, as had to be born before the establishment of the nation
    In regards to JFK I never heard of him having dual citizenship, I believe, you are wrong on that.
    Main point is thecitizenship at birth. At birth Obama was a foreign citizen

12. CatskillMountain
    March 26th, 2012 @ 2:08 am

    In the 1960s my dear old Granny told her grandchildren that she was happy her children and grandchildren could be president, but that she could not, even having born in Manhattan.

    Reason: Her parents were not yet naturalized when she was born, although she was born in America and a “citizen.”

    She was also a subject of the crown of the nation of her parents.

    What did she learn about American civics and the Constitution around 1900 that Congress does not understand now?

13. Jim Fields
    March 26th, 2012 @ 2:55 am

    I did a check on JFK and both of his parents was born in Boston, Mass.

14. Frank Whittaker
    March 26th, 2012 @ 6:01 am

    Even the Fogbow freaks think you have nothing to worry about with regards to the Dems legal attack.

    It will come to nothing. Don’t waste your time. Just ignore it.

15. Linda Shook
    March 26th, 2012 @ 8:03 am

    Don’t you find it ODD that “his” granmother, that raised him, conviently died and then was cremated, 2 day before he was sworn in the office of the President of the United States.

16. taino21
    March 26th, 2012 @ 9:16 am

    Johan, the judgement issue by Malihi, and I am not even going to give him the respect to call him a judge, is irrelevant. There is precedent already established by the Supreme Court, Minor v. Happersett on what a Natural Born Citizen is,(“‘At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country, of parents [plural] who were its citizens [plural], became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further, and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction, without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case, it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient, for everything we have now to consider, that all children, born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction, are themselves citizens.’ Minor v. Happersett (1874) 21 Wall. 162, 166-168.”) and Perkins v. Elg.,(U. S. Supreme Court’s Relevant Facts: Miss Elg was born in Brooklyn, New York, on October 2, 1907. Her parents, who were natives of Sweden, emigrated to the United States sometime prior to 1906 and her father was naturalized here in that year. In 1911, her mother took her to Sweden where she continued to reside until September 7, 1929. Her father went to Sweden in 1922 and has not since returned to the United States. In November, 1934, he made a statement before an American consul in Sweden that he had voluntarily expatriated himself for the reason that he did not desire to retain the status of an American citizen and wished to preserve his allegiance to Sweden. [Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325, 327 (1939).]

    U. S. Supreme Court’s Holding: The court below, properly recognizing the existence of an actual controversy with the defendants (Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth, 300 U.S. 227, 57 S.Ct. 461, 81 L.Ed. 617, 108 A.L.R. 1000) declared Miss Elg ‘to be a natural born citizen of the United States’ (99 F.2d 414) and we think that the decree should include the Secretary of State as well as the other defendants. [Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325, 350 (1939).]

    Rationale of the logic is as follows: The U. S. Supreme Court in 1939 held that Elg was a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN because she was born in Brooklyn, New York on October 2, 1907, her father was naturalized as a U.S. citizen in 1906 under the Naturalization Act of 1906, and her mother derived her US citizenship in 1907 under the Expatriation Act of 1907. The Expatriation Act of 1907 extended the logic linking a woman’s citizenship to her marital status and the status of her spouse.

    Ms. Elg was found to be a “natural born citizen” because she was born in the mainland USA (New York) of TWO US citizen parents.
    The Acts of 1906 and 1907) and no lower court can overturn the Supreme Court. Malihi is obviously corrupt and his judgement should be reversed if we can find someone that has not been corrupted by Obama and his goons.

17. Jim Fields
    March 26th, 2012 @ 9:46 am

    Your right, she would really know the truth.

Leave a Reply