I am working on this now. It is 2:30 am, I will be at the Mayor’s breakfast in four and a half hours, time for a break
Posted on | March 15, 2012 | 8 Comments
DR. ORLY TAITZ ,ESQ
29839 SANTA MARGARITA PKWY, STE 100
SANTA MARGARITA, CA 92688
PH. 949-683-5411 FAX 949-766-7603
ORLY.TAITZ
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
____________________________________
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE § Opposition to motion for summary n § affirmance
APPELLANT, § §
v. §
§
KATHY RUEMMLER IN HER CAPACITY§
AS THE WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL §
AND CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS §
APPELLEE §
____________________________________
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ, (Hereinafter “Taitz”) Appellant is opposing Appellee’s motion for summary affordance as frivolous and unsupported by fact and law. Motion for summary judgment in favor of the Appellant is warranted.
Opposition to motion for
ARGUMENT
During Watergate over thirty corrupt high ranked governmental official, including the White House counsel were indicted and went to prison. Today, during ObamaForgeryGate, the level of corruption is overwhelming and far surpasses the level of corruption we saw during Watergate.
In January 26, 2012 Taitz represented several plaintiffs in the state of Georgia in a case Farrar et al v Obama et al. OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-1215136-60-MALIHI. At trial Taitz examined several witnesses, among them a senior Deportation officer of the department of Homeland Security and a licensed investigator, certified with the department of Homeland Security. All of the witnesses testified that the alleged copy of the original long form birth certificate, posted by Barack Hussein Obama on WhiteHouse.gov, represents a computer generated forgery and not a copy of any document. John Sampson, senior deportation officer, testified that with such documents he would typically seek a warrant for an arrest and deportation of an individual. (Exhibit 1 transcript of January 26, 2012 hearing in Farrar et al v Obama et al) (Exhibit 3 Video tape of the trial in Farrar et al v Obama and of the March 1, 2012 press conference of Sheriff Arpaio)
On March 1, 2012, Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa county held a press conference, where he confirmed all of the findings and evidence submitted to courts by Taitz. Arpaio and investigator Zulo affirmed that the alleged birth certificate of Obama is a computer generated forgery.
Subject of this case, is a FOIA request to examine an alleged copy of the aforementioned forgery, which was presented to the public by the former White House counsel Robert Bauer and currently being kept by the new White House Counsel, Kathy Ruemmler.
1. Appellee did not provide one single authority, which would provide for a summary affirmance. There is a legitimate process of filing an Appellate brief, Appellee’s brief and Appellant’s reply. Motion for summary affirmance is not described in the rules of court and not a legitimate form of conducting an appeal.
2. The essence of the Motion for Summary affirmance, is the position of Kathy Ruemmler, White House counsel, Appellee, that White House counsel is not subject to FOIA. However, even the lower court judge disagreed with the position that the White House counsel enjoys 100%, full protection. Lower court actually agreed with the Appellant and her contention that in some situations protection from FOIA discovery does not apply. Lower court agreed that under Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington 566 F3d at 222, protection from FOIA does not apply where the White House counsel or White House staff exert sufficient independant authority from the president to warrant agency treatment under FOIA.
2. In his final order Judge Lamberth noted that indeed White House Director of communications Dan Pfeifer, and Press Secretary Jay Carney and former White House counsel Robert Bauer held an independent press conference with this alleged birth certificate, which later shown to be a forgery and Mr. Obama was kept away from the document, judge Lamberth argues that there is no proof that the president did not know about their actions, that he did not direct them to act in this manner, therefore there was no independent authority and FOIA applies.
3. Whether there was an independent authority or not, is a factual matter that needs to be decided De Novo by the tier of fact. this is not an issue to be diced summarily on a motion for Summary Affirmance. For that reason alone the motion for summary affirmance needs to be denied.
4. Additionally this approach creates a catch 22 for the Appellee. If one assumes that there was an independent action by the White House counsel during the April 27 press conference, then the alleged copy of Obama’s birth certificate is recoverable under FOIA. If there was no independent activity and White House counsel acted in unison with Mr. Obama, than we have a case of a criminal conspiracy to defraud American citizens, utter a computer generated forgery and claim it to be a basis for the position of the US President. Now, FOIA protection applies to “The President’s immediate personal staff or units in the Executive office whose sole function is to advice and assist the President are not included within the term “agency” under the FOIA, ” Kissinger v Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press, 445 U.S. 136, 156 (1980). and 5 USC §552 (f). Simple construction of the statute means that
a. one is indeed a legitimate President. It does not include one who is not a legitimate President, one who got in the White House by fraud, by using a computer generated forgery instead of a valid birth certificate.
b. “advice and assist” by the White House counsel are related to the legitimate functions of a President. Defrauding the whole nation by presenting a cheap forgery and claiming it to be valid true and correct copy of a document does not represent a valid “advice and assist” by the White House counsel. For “advice” like this the white House counsel should be stripped of his position and disbarred, as well as sent together with the client to serve a lengthy prison term. Criminal enterprise, criminal collusion does not represent and advice protected by FOIA and envisioned by FOIA.
5. What is more is that the same District judge stripped protection of not only Presidential record immunity from FOIA release, but also Grand Jury proceedings immunity from FOIA release and made public Richard Nixon’s grand jury testimony as well as transcripts of White House taped conversation from 1971-1973 pursuant to FOIA request in In Re Petition of Stanley Kutler et al 10-547(RCL). Judge Lamberth ordered redaction of only a few parts of the documents, where privacy of living persons was involved and the matters of National security are involved. In case at hand Obama publicly released the content of the alleged “document”, so the privacy no longer applies. What’s more the interests of the National security in this case would require the release of the document in question, and not just any release, but an immediate, expedient release, as at issue is the usurpation of the US Presidency. So, why were the Nixon tapes released, while Obama’s original documents and alleged copies are so heavily guarded? The answer might be more economic than legal. It might be a part and parcel of the same reasoning, which caused Nixon to be thrown under the bus by the International oligarchy de facto running the show, and caused Obama to be protected for now.
Nixon seemed to be useful for the oligarchy as he did away with the gold standard and Breton Woods agreements, however Nixon bulked on GATT (global economic tariffs and trade). It seems he didn’t buy into the conclusions of the Tokyo round and became an impediment to the globalization. On the other hand Obama, in spite of his flagrant criminality and lack of any valid identification papers and lack of legitimacy is simply convenient and obedient.
Comments
8 Responses to “I am working on this now. It is 2:30 am, I will be at the Mayor’s breakfast in four and a half hours, time for a break”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
March 15th, 2012 @ 6:09 am
I LOVE reading everything you write. Great job. Keep up the good work and I’ll be praying for you to be successful for us all.
Thank you Orly.
March 15th, 2012 @ 7:00 am
Excellent. Your reasoning is brilliant. I’m proud to say, “I am one of your supporters.”
March 15th, 2012 @ 7:53 am
Ditto, Orly. You are the best thing this country has ever seen. A true patriot!
March 15th, 2012 @ 10:02 am
Please make getting enough sleep and taking care of your health a priority.
March 15th, 2012 @ 10:34 am
If only anyone appreciated the stresses you are under as a dentist and attorney and surgeon. You unleash your briefs at night, while taking care of those in need and in pain all day long.
You have really shown the true dogged spirit that most people don’t appreciate anymore – when someone needs to be out of office it’s not the lazy americans who do it but a tireless immigrant who is here to set us straight as a nation.
So keep up the hard work Orly.
What I don’t usderstand is how all the judges keep ruling against us when the case is so clear-cutt. You’d think at least one of them is a Republican. Otherwise they’re all working together.
Remember what Republic of Arkan-Tex High Judge & Special Treasurer Daniel McMartin said: We have to do this on our own.
March 15th, 2012 @ 11:27 am
[…] more here: I am working on this now. It is 2:30 am, I will be at the Mayor's … Tags: advice-and, are-not, assist-the, included-within, president, protection-applies, […]
March 15th, 2012 @ 4:23 pm
I don’t know. Personally, I’d like to see Orly have a good stroke. That way, any future appearances she would be in a wheel chair and she’ll be drooling out of her mouth and wearing diapers to keep her shit in. So, yes, please Orly Taitz. Keep working long hours. I hope you have a good stroke or heart attack soon but I don’t want you to die. You’re too much amusement.
April 10th, 2012 @ 2:23 am
poster websites
Appreciate the articles! It shown to be really beneficial in my encounter and i am certain to all visitors from it.