7 Responses to “Illegal regime of usurper Obama spits in the face of the American Congress”

1. questions
   March 13th, 2012 @ 9:47 am

   Since Obama and Panetta made it known to Congress they will consult with NATO and the UN on initiating war, talking with Congress after the fact, one Congressman is getting the ball rolling on impeachment.

   Search on internet: H. Con. Res. 107

   Wonder why the main news sources aren’t reporting this?

2. Steve m
   March 13th, 2012 @ 9:48 am

   Obama also spit in the face of our military saying he’s proud of them ‘generally’.
   With heavy emphasis on generally he uses this chance to slander and divide our military with the reason of one brain injured soldier who totally melted down.
   This is 100% orchestrated and calculated by Obama to divide and cause chaos for his own ideological reasons and to implode our Country from within.

3. questions
   March 13th, 2012 @ 9:49 am

   Sorry if this is a double posting but I am not sure my first posting took.

   Search the internet: H. Con. Res. 107

4. courage
   March 13th, 2012 @ 1:41 pm

   Find this article on WND
   Why Obama cannot be impeached
   Exclusive: Devvy Kidd on how a usurper by definition is immune from removal
   Published: 07/14/2011 at 12:00 AM

   Rage continues to build across this country over the obvious forged birth certificate Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Obama, released April 27, 2011, as do calls for his impeachment. However, Obama cannot be impeached.
   Let me quote Dr. Edwin Vieira, who wrote about this back in December 2008 before Obama was “sworn” into office:If Obama is not “a natural born Citizen” or has renounced such citizenship, he is simply not eligible for “the Office of President” (Article II, Section 1, Clause 4). That being so, he cannot be “elected” by the voters, by the Electoral College, or by the House of Representatives (see Amendment XII). For neither the voters, nor the Electors, nor members of the House can change the constitutional requirement, even by unanimous vote inter sese (see Article V). If, nonetheless, the voters, the Electors, or the members of the House purport to “elect” Obama, he will be nothing but a usurper, because the Constitution defines him as such. And he can never become anything else, because a usurper cannot gain legitimacy if even all of the country aid, abets, accedes to, or acquiesces in his usurpation.
   If Obama dares to take the Presidential “Oath or Affirmation” of office, knowing that he is not “a natural born Citizen,” he will commit the crime of perjury or false swearing (see Article II, Section 1, Clause 7). For, being ineligible for “the Office of President,” he cannot “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States,” or even execute it at all, to any degree. Thus, his very act of taking the “Oath or Affirmation” will be a violation thereof! So, even if the chief justice of the Supreme Court himself looks the other way and administers the “Oath or Affirmation,” Obama will derive no authority whatsoever from it.
   Third, his purported “Oath or Affirmation” being perjured from the beginning, Obama’s every subsequent act in the usurped “Office of President” will be a criminal offense under Title 18, United States Code, Section 242.
   If Obama does become an usurper posturing as “the President,” Congress cannot even impeach him because, not being the actual President, he cannot be “removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” (see Article II, Section 4).
   For those who think Dr. Vieira Jr., Ph.D., J.D., is just some run-of-the-mill attorney, let me give you a very condensed bio: He holds four degrees from Harvard. For more than 30 years he has practiced law, with emphasis on constitutional issues. In the Supreme Court of the United States, he successfully argued or briefed the cases leading to the landmark decisions Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson and Communications Workers of America v. Beck. His two volume tome, “Pieces of Eight: The Monetary Powers and Disabilities of the United States Constitution,” is the most comprehensive study in existence of American monetary law and history viewed from a constitutional perspective.
   Despite all the noise out there by Obama’s supporters, it is crystal clear the putative president was born with dual citizenship and is forever ineligible to be president.
   Obama seized the office of president through fraud. As a usurper, he’s never held office. That’s what the word usurp means: to seize and hold (a position, office, power, etc.) by force or without legal right. Since he legally has never occupied the White House as president, he cannot be impeached.
   Now, when I have pointed this out countless times to groups demanding impeachment, I get this response: I don’t care – we just have to get him out.
   Those are people who proudly proclaim they only want to see the U.S. Constitution upheld. Those are people who state unequivocally that the usurper was never eligible to run because he’s not a natural born citizen under the U.S. Constitution.
   You can’t have it both ways. In essence, what those folks are saying is we can do the same thing as Obama and his coconspirators: circumvent the Constitution.
   But, the usurper has committed crimes while in office! Indeed, he has and continues to do so. Knowing he was not eligible to run, the putative president solicited campaign donations to the tune of about $700 million dollars. He can still be indicted for wire fraud.
   Those who demand his impeachment are asking to set one of the worst legal precedents in our history: Any constitutionally ineligible thug can come along and buy his way into the White House. We’ll just impeach him later!
   To impeach would also accomplish this: Every piece of legislation he’s signed into law would remain on the books. Let me quote Dr. Vieira one more time:
   “Perhaps most importantly, Congress can pass no law while an usurper pretends to occupy “the Office of President.” The Constitution provides that “[e]very Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States” (Article I, Section 7, Clause 2). Not to a usurper posturing as “the President of the United States,” but to the true and rightful President. If no such true and rightful President occupies the White House, no “Bill” will or can, “before it become a Law, be presented to [him].” If no “Bill” is so presented, no “Bill” will or can become a “Law.” And any purported “Law” that the usurper “approve[s]” and “sign[s],” or that Congress passes over the usurper’s “Objections,” will be a nullity. Thus, if Obama deceitfully “enters office” as an usurper, Congress will be rendered effectively impotent for as long as it acquiesces in his pretenses as “President.”
   Besides removing a usurper from office, that should be our second-highest consideration and why the outlaw Congress hasn’t moved against him. All 535 of them allowed this to happen, and now it’s gone so far; they don’t have the courage to take on the mess they’ve made.
   The usurper can be indicted once out of office, but how to get him out? Please take the time to read my column on that process. Will he ever be indicted for his crimes? With enough public pressure, it can happen because his handlers would simply throw him under the bus as a liability.
   There will be a massive push to keep the putative president off the ballot in dozens of states. It will come from candidates who understand the process discussed in my column above. Mark my words, what’s coming will be a nightmare for the DNC and Obama’s handlers. Time is running out for them to find another viable candidate; something will have to give. One way or the other, Obama’s crimes are going to catch up with him, but please stop working toward setting the wrong legal precedent. It’s beyond frustrating, I know, but either we live our words in supporting the U.S. Constitution or we take the wrong road opening the door for another ineligible candidate with enough money and corrupt individuals behind him to seize the office of president.

5. steve
   March 13th, 2012 @ 4:08 pm

   I understand your quoted points but the House Resolution 107 is regarding Obama’s unauthorized military action into Libya w/o Congressional approval and has impeachment repercussions.
   Obama is being pressured from all fronts with this resolution, Dr. Taitz attacking all jurisdictions with Obama’s looming ineligibility nightmare, not to mention economic crisis, foreign relations disaster, appointed czars and dept. heads caught in their own corrupt acts- you’re right, time IS running out for Obama.
   The knockout punch would be demanding and getting a Congr. Investigation of fraudulent
   Obama papers used to gain Obama Presidency.

6. john
   March 15th, 2012 @ 4:13 pm

   RacerJim, I hope you enjoy the little discussion you’ll be having soon with those nice Secret Service agents. It’s not a wise idea to publicly associate one’s name with a call for the violent overthrow of the American goevernment, comrade!

Leave a Reply