45 Responses to “Motion for reconsideration was forwarded to the Secretary of State of NH and the Ballot law Commission”

1. Foggy
   February 18th, 2012 @ 10:09 am

   I’m sure it was just an oversight that you failed to tell the New Hampshire Secretary of State that the judge who heard all that “witness sworn testimony and exhibits entered into evidence” ruled that your experts are not experts in anything relevant and your evidence didn’t come close to proving what you think it proves.

   But that’s OK, babydoll. I’ll be glad to fill in the gap with a letter to the Secretary of State of New Hampshire describing more fully your epic failure. Did you see me at the hearing? I saw you, but you were too busy lying to the television weenies.

2. garth
   February 18th, 2012 @ 11:30 am

   Hey “FOGGY”, get a clue and step up to reality!
   Let’s take a simple case, say you have someone verbally threaten YOU & or your family in front of one witness. You take a written statement from your witness, and serve the person that threatened you, with a supeona to appear in court, as you have filed for a restraining order. You show up in court with the witness statement and the defendant is a no show. Guess what, due process of law and the judge, declares a automatic default judgement. As the defendant was not there and
   gave no defense. Judge rules in you favor and usually issues a 3 year restraining order. All over America this happens on a daily basis.
   In hearing & judging Orly’s cases, the judges are way, way out of line with America’s normal
   judicial procedures or at the least are just
   cowards or as you so aptly describe the media as television weenies. How about some due process of law?

3. James Durwood Johnson
   February 18th, 2012 @ 12:10 pm

   Dear Foggy,

   Why don’t you get specific and go into detail why you feel that nothing Dr. Orly Taitz Esq. has filed in court means anything. Please don’t hide behind unconstitutional court rulings. That what the majority of the people did in Germany in the 1930s and 1940s, and look what it did to their country. I suggest you do some investigating on your own. Best place to start would be to study everything Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. has submitted to the courts, then come back to this web-site and inform all us in DETAIL where the facts/evidence Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. is in error. No dodging around and nit picking around, go straight to what most of us on the web-site believe are solid unrufutable facts/evidence. Foggy I think I’ll give you just a little short list to start. I’m only going to mention some of the errors on the that very cheap, poor forgery of a birth certificate that was created from many different documents, that Obama had place on line and displayed on television on April 27, 2011.

   #1- Why are some of the lettered kerned. Supposely this BC was typed in 1961. The typing machines that kerned letter were available until the early 1980s. Oops!

   #2- Why does this BC have a different Registrar name then the other BC that were created at the same time from the same hospital. Oops!

   #3- why did the Governor of Hawaii come out at one time and says that Obama does have a BC on Record. Oops!

   #4- Why is there a person who is/was connected with the department that keep BC records in Hawaii on the record saying that they had see Obama’s BC, and that it was half WRITTEN and half TYPE. Oops!

   I apologize to all you readers for repeating my self, but these questions have never been answered properly. And they deserve an answer.

   Forgery is a felony and a felon isn’t allowed to reside in the White House. Oops!

   Lets all see if we can make a transfer of housing for Whats-His-Name.

4. James Durwood Johnson
   February 18th, 2012 @ 12:16 pm

   I’m sorry on my list above on #3- it should have said “DOES NOT” instead of “DOES HAVE”

   Please bear with me, I’m a terrible, speller, typist, and my grammar is suspect.

5. Nugene
   February 18th, 2012 @ 12:42 pm

   It’s not over until the fat lady sings. Why don’t you tell Orly where she lied? How do you make a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, out of that USURPER. Obot lawyers not suing Orly.

6. Foggy
   February 18th, 2012 @ 1:13 pm

   James, her record of unbroken failure and sanctions speaks for itself. Everything Orly says is a lie, and a stupid lie.

   Could you point me to the place in the Constitution where it says “a felon isn’t allowed to reside in the White House”? I can’t find it. I think the American people could elect a convicted felon to the presidency, if we were stupid enough to do so, and there’s nothing in the Constitution that says he or she would be ineligible.

   @garth: “Let’s take a simple case, say you have someone verbally threaten YOU & or your family in front of one witness. You take a written statement from your witness, and serve the person that threatened you, with a supeona to appear in court, as you have filed for a restraining order. You show up in court with the witness statement and the defendant is a no show. Guess what, due process of law and the judge, declares a automatic default judgement. As the defendant was not there and
   gave no defense. Judge rules in you favor and usually issues a 3 year restraining order. All over America this happens on a daily basis.”

   But what if the judge listens to you and decides you’re lying? Suppose you describe a series of events that aren’t physically possible? Then, even if the defendant is a no-show, you lose. That happens on a daily basis, too.

   That’s what happened in Georgia. The judge listened to all Orly’s evidence and decided it was all a pile of crap. That’s how bad she really is.

7. James Durwood Johnson
   February 18th, 2012 @ 2:19 pm

   Nugene, is that your full name or are you try to hide who you really are? Be more specific in what you say say, so we will have an opportunity to address what you are saying.

   Please tell us how in the world Obama could sue Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., when Obama is terrified at the very thought of appearing in the same courtroom as Dr Orly Taitz, Esq., and come face to face with her.

   Nugent, Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. is not the running scared and paying high price lawyers millions of dollars to protect her, and hide her past from the American Public. Her life is an open book, try reading it, you might be impress.

8. MichaelN
   February 18th, 2012 @ 2:36 pm

   In 1790, in the First Naturalization Act of 1790, only three years after the adoption of the US Constitution, the US Congress and Senate, some of whom were also party to the construction of the US Constitution, defined “natural born citizen” to mean by natural DESCENT from US citizen parents.

   The definition was applied to children born off shore who were NOT native born.

   Therefore “natural born” did and does not mean native born without consideration of the US citizenship status of the parents.

   Even the US Government’s Citizenship and Immigration Service makes the distinction between native born and natural born, when they say this …………..

   Interpretation 324.2 Reacquisition of citizenship lost by marriage.

   “The effect of naturalization under the above statutes was not to erase the previous period of alienage, but to restore the person to the status if naturalized, NATIVE, OR NATURAL_BORN citizen, as determined by her status prior to loss.”

   and

   “The words ‘shall be deemed to be a citizen of the United States to the same extent as though her marriage to said alien had taken place on or after September 22, 1922’, as they appeared in the 1936 and 1940 statutes, are prospective and restore the status of NATIVE-BORN or NATURAL-BORN(WHICHEVER existed prior to the loss) as of the date citizenship was reacquired.”

   https://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-45104/0-0-0-48602.html

9. Larry
   February 18th, 2012 @ 3:01 pm

   Foggy…I have just one question….Why not just go get a copy of his birth certificate with the media in tow…and pay just $10 or $15 …that is all it cost me to prove to social security I was who I said I was. He has spent Millions to try to hide it….WHY????
   I bet there are 100 of thousands of people that would do exactly that to find a good job.

10. Nugene
    February 18th, 2012 @ 4:46 pm

    James. No. Nugene is my first name(NMI). I’m saying if someone slandered me, it not be true, I would sue them. Everything Orly says is TRUE, The Obots can’t get anywhere near a court with Orly. Fly down on AF ONE, have to catch a Greyhound home.When the USURPER GOES DOWN, The fat Lady can sing.

11. James Durwood Johnson
    February 18th, 2012 @ 6:16 pm

    Foggy, are you 100% sure of what you wrote to me is true?

    You’re telling me, if a candidate uses fraudulent documentation while, seeking employment as President of the United States, and it is later proven that that person used forged documents, to fool the employer (The American People), while running for that office, there are no existing laws on the books that would disqualify him from holding that office, and immediately convict him of TREASON?

    TREASON is a FELONY!

    Look up all the definitions of TREASON

12. James Durwood Johnson
    February 18th, 2012 @ 6:45 pm

    Oh bye the way Foggy,

    If you are convicted of TREASON which is a felony, you are barred from running for any/all elected government offices, including the Presidency of the United States. Check it out!

13. James Durwood Johnson
    February 18th, 2012 @ 7:27 pm

    Foggy, I didn’t know that you were a nit picker, but I guess that what you have to be, since you can’t address the real facts/evidence that Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. has submitted to the court.
    Please don’t lower yourself to name calling, just explain in detail where all of Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. facts/evidence is not true. Don’t just pick one thing because if any of what Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq, is saying is true that should be enough to end Obama’s presidency and keep off all the 2012 ballots. Remember in detail without any name calling. If you can do this Foggy you will be the first person that has. Go for it!

14. Edward Osiecki
    February 18th, 2012 @ 8:13 pm

    @ FOGGY

    Why don’t you stand up for a minute and give your foggy brains a break.

15. orly taitz
    February 18th, 2012 @ 9:56 pm

    🙂

16. Foggy
    February 19th, 2012 @ 2:32 am

    Do you know why Orly’s smiling? It’s not because she has a chance to remove the President of the United States. She knows full well that he’s legitimate and eligible and will NEVER be removed from office for ineligibility. There’s a reason why she’s lost every case she ever filed, and always will.

    No, she’s smiling because she has morons like you fooled. Do you send her money? 😀

17. orly taitz
    February 19th, 2012 @ 5:22 am

    again, insults and no facts. I presented he facts, that Obama is using a stlen SSN 042-68-4425 from the state of CT, issued in 1890. I brought witnesses testifying, that he is using a forgery instead of a valid BC an that Obama is not even his last name. what did you offer to counter that? nothing bu insults. You belong in prison for harassment, just like Barack Obama belongs in prison for fraud

18. James Durwood Johnson
    February 19th, 2012 @ 7:16 am

    Foggy.

    Why are you playing both sides against the middle?

    Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., Is going straight down, the middle, straight as an arrow and has never wavered, even slightly.

    Foggy is the perfect name for you to be using on this web-site.

    Don’t you think you are trying to take this reverse, double psychology thing a bit too far?

19. RacerJim
    February 19th, 2012 @ 7:25 am

    @Foggy

    What happened in Georgia was that Judge Mahili violated Georgia election law which says that the burden of proof of eligibility is on the person seeking to be on an election ballot rather than on the challenger. Obama provided no proof of eligibility whatsoever during the hearing and, therefore, Judge Mahili was bound by Georgia law to find him ineligible.

    Reportedly, either soon before or soon after the hearing Obama’s attorney in Georgia provided Judge Mahili and the SoS with copies of Obama’s short-form and long-form birth certificates, and those are what Judge Mahili based his opinion on that Obama was born in Hawaii. However, the latter would also be a violation of Georgia law because Obama’s attorney did not profer those documents as evidence during the hearing.

20. Paul Jackson
    February 19th, 2012 @ 7:39 am

    “orly taitz
    February 19th, 2012 @ 5:22 am

    again, insults and no facts. I presented he facts, that Obama is using a stlen SSN 042-68-4425 from the state of CT, issued in 1890. I brought witnesses testifying, that he is using a forgery instead of a valid BC an that Obama is not even his last name. what did you offer to counter that? nothing bu insults. You belong in prison for harassment, just like Barack Obama belongs in prison for fraud”

    No, Orly, you’ve never presented any facts You present unsubstantiated rumor, inuendo, etc … not even evidence, and certainly not admissible evidence, much less fact. In addition, the vast majority of what you present and claim to be fact when it’s not, doesn’t even matter as to his eligibility. It’s completely irrelevant, in addition to inadmissible.

21. BFB
    February 19th, 2012 @ 7:53 am

    Orly sez:
    “again, insults and no facts. I presented he facts, that Obama is using a stlen SSN 042-68-4425 from the state of CT, issued in 1890. I brought witnesses testifying, that he is using a forgery instead of a valid BC an that Obama is not even his last name. what did you offer to counter that? nothing bu insults. You belong in prison for harassment, just like Barack Obama belongs in prison for fraud.”

    And the first time you were able to present those “facts,” as you call them, to a judge, the judge ruled that they were not credible.

    In other words, crap.

    And somehow that’s a victory to you, to the extent where you take those “facts” that a ruled are crap, and submit them across the country as if they were, well, not crap.

    And, you ask your “followers” to send you more money, so you can continue to send these pieces of crap across the country.

    Great racket you’ve got going there, Orly.

22. orly taitz
    February 19th, 2012 @ 8:17 am

    how is a testimony of a Senior Deportation officer with 30 years of experience represent crap, particularly as opposed to the fact that the Thief -in-chief Obama presented nothing?
    No, this is not crap. Corruption that we are witnessing during the Obama regime, represents crap, that needs to be cleaned up asap, before the putrid odors overcome the whole nation

23. James Durwood Johnson
    February 19th, 2012 @ 8:29 am

    Nugene, Two Thumbs up, I think. Things are getting a little hectic on this web-site. Maybe people are getting a little worried.

24. James Durwood Johnson
    February 19th, 2012 @ 8:47 am

    To BFB,

    Are you just dense or dumb? I’m not calling you names, I’m just asking you a simple question. After reading what you have posted above, I’m not sure which.

    If you know for a fact the all the things Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. has filed with the courts is crap, why don’t you address each and everything that Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. filed with the courts and explain to the reader of this web-site in detail why they are crap, and not solid facts/evidence.

    See if you can refrain from any name calling why you are trying to refute all of Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.’s facts/evidence. Nobody has done it yet. Why don’t you try to be the first?

25. Paul Jackson
    February 19th, 2012 @ 8:48 am

    “how is a testimony of a Senior Deportation officer with 30 years of experience represent crap,”

    Simply because all his testimony, and that of all the other witnesses, was pure speculation and/or irrelevant to the one issue before the judge, and that was is he eligible to be on the GA primary ballot.

26. steve m.
    February 19th, 2012 @ 9:06 am

    @ Foggy and BFB:

    You two clowns don’t deserve a response.
    Your poor leftist brains can’t comprehend
    reason, so get the hell out of this house.
    We should save the debate for reasonable people who matter.

27. steve m.
    February 19th, 2012 @ 9:18 am

    @ foggy
    @ bfb

    your mommies are calling,
    she says breakfast is ready!

28. James Durwood Johnson
    February 19th, 2012 @ 9:36 am

    For those of you that have said that Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. is spearheading the Obama eligibility issue for money, why?

    Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. was already more of a success than most of us would ever hope to be. She is Doctor, Lawyer, mother, wife, and was living a comfortable life here in Sunny Southern California. She had all the physical things that she wanted or needed. I’m sure Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. was financially better off before she took this eligibility issue on.

    But since you can’t depute of facts/evidence that she has against Obama, you have to resort to attacking her personally.

    Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., is sacrificing her life because she cherishes the United States of America’s Constitution, and see doesn’t want to see it destroyed.

29. James Durwood Johnson
    February 19th, 2012 @ 10:03 am

    Oops, on my last line posted above it should have started out “she” not “see”

    Please forgive me for my spelling, typing, and grammar errors. I’m certain there will be a lot more.

30. orly taitz
    February 19th, 2012 @ 10:48 am

    so on what basis did the judge assume that the usurper has any papers? none were produced

31. James Durwood Johnson
    February 19th, 2012 @ 10:53 am

    Double Oops, I found another mistake. The sixth line from the bottom of what I posted above that starts out “But”: The “of” should have been “the”.

    Please hang in there with me, I’m trying.

32. James Durwood Johnson
    February 19th, 2012 @ 11:05 am

    To steve m.,
    Please don’t run Foggy and BFB off, its enlighten to see stupid the other side really is. All they seemed to do is call us name.

    Remember that saying as a kid.

    Sticks and stones will break my bones, but dirty names will never hurt me.

    I believe all the solid facts/evidence that Dr. Orly taitz, Esq. has put out for the public viewing has forced them to resort to name calling rather than addressing the solid facts/evidence she has out there.

33. James Durwood Johnson
    February 19th, 2012 @ 11:17 am

    Oops, Oops, Oops,

    Another mistake,

    I should have the word “how” on the 2nd line after the word “see”

34. James Durwood Johnson
    February 19th, 2012 @ 11:51 am

    Maybe Obama failed to submit papers in court.

    But doesn’t Obama has a lot of papers in hiding with different names and social security # on them. But I don’t think the papers that Obama might be hiding could help him in court. If he did submit those papers it would make it just a little harder to rule in his favor. But the courts would probably rule that those papers have “NO STANDING”.

35. James A Davis SR
    February 19th, 2012 @ 12:45 pm

    Don’t pay any attention to FOGGY he must be on the dole and getting his communist hand outs and he knows when pappy in the white house is removed(one way or another)he will lose his hand outs.He would do better at a site of his own type.Idoits understand idiots.

36. James Durwood Johnson
    February 19th, 2012 @ 2:51 pm

    Why do pro Obama people is come to this web-site?

    Are they trying to convert us?

    I never visit a pro Obama web-site.

    Obamaites, please explain why you come to this web-site. By doing so you make this web-site bigger and stronger, so in the long run you are a benefit to Dr. Orly Tairz, Esq. So let me be the first to thank you for your visits. Please come more often.

37. OustTheOs
    February 19th, 2012 @ 4:33 pm

    Mr. Johnson, Foggy, BFB, Leviticus (all the same person) comes in here to see how close Orly is, to destroying their way of life.

    They argue just like their animal trainer, Obama. No facts, just accusations. Like, blah, blah, blah. We shouldn’t even respond to them. Just make them as meaningless as they are…

    Orly, the heat is on, from them, so you must be getting mighty close! You ROCK!!!

38. pi314159
    February 20th, 2012 @ 10:56 pm

    Tje heat is crazy hot. The emails for Oboama’s legal defense fund are incessant. We know how close Orly is and it scares us.

    FEAR!

39. bobNnorthcarolina
    February 26th, 2012 @ 8:25 am

    the name of James Durwood Johnson has a reputation on the web. Who is this James Durwood Johnson and who is this Foggy that post to this site–almost sounds like Foggy and JDJ are the same person goining back and forth trolling and fishing.

40. bobby
    February 29th, 2012 @ 5:42 pm

    JDJ, why did you kill Jacob? Out on bail for murder, and you still find time to post on this loser site. Creepy loser.

41. James Durwood Johnson
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 4:44 pm

    Bobby,

    I am not the man that killed his son in Texas.

    Bobby, what do have to say about the Sheriff in Arizona on March 1, 2012, who went on live Television and live Online explaining in detail how Obama’s BC, and Selective Service papers were forgeries, and who ever the people are that created them have committed felonies and they should be arrested, given trials, then incarcerated.

    Bobby we are all waiting to see if you can come up with good answers, to what the Sheriff has said about Obama’s fraudulent papers, or are you just going to stoop to name calling.

    Bobby could you please inform the readers of this Web-site where the Sheriff is wrong in any of his aligations.

42. James Durwood Johnson
    March 3rd, 2012 @ 4:47 pm

    Bobby,

    I am not the man that killed his son in Texas.

    Bobby, what do have to say about the Sheriff in Arizona on March 1, 2012, who went on live Television and live Online explaining in detail how Obama’s BC, and Selective Service papers were forgeries, and who ever the people are that created them have committed felonies and they should be arrested, given trials, then incarcerated.

    Bobby we are all waiting to see if you can come up with good answers, to what the Sheriff has said about Obama’s fraudulent papers, or are you just going to stoop to name calling.

43. Las Vegas Refrigerator Parts
    July 22nd, 2014 @ 2:33 am

    I’m impressed, I have to admit. Rarepy do I come across a blog that’s equally educative and amusing, and without a doubt, you’ve hit
    the nail on the head. The problem is something too few men and
    women are speaking intelligently about. I’m very happy I found this
    during my search for something regarding this.

44. blog creation sites
    August 4th, 2014 @ 12:03 pm

    Highly descriptive article, I loved that bit.

    Will there be a part 2?

45. top blogging sites
    August 4th, 2014 @ 6:32 pm

    Howdy! Do you know if they make any plugins to protect against hackers?
    I’m kinda paranoid about losing everything I’ve worked hard on. Any
    tips?

Leave a Reply