15 Responses to “You have to keep fighting with me. Those, who don’t fight, don’t win”

1. William Blasingame
   February 7th, 2012 @ 4:42 pm

   I have done everything I can think of out side of acually committing any crimes and that I will not do as I have to many health issues to spend ANY time in jail. I have had SS here once because i said I want to see obama piglosie and biden hung on gallows built on White House Lawn after they have been tried and convicted of High Treason And i want them left there for the next 200 years. That comment got me a 45 minute sit down with SS and they got a birther lesson big time. I have written everyone Tweeted everyone involved in this coverup and told them they be put to death for High Treason and their family name will go down is history as traitors to America. Im sure its just a matter of time and SS will be back to get me and haul me away soon. Personally I think the only way to fix this is to actually get a few million people to show up at the White House and remove Him. Then go to congress and senate and remove them. Then let the military come in and run things till we can have honest elections. But i Do not see that happening. I might have 10 years left of my life and no more family. When im gone its the last of my blood from my mother with no kids to pass on. 9 generations of American history ends with me. Pretty sad that I will be the last one and I get to see America fall to islam and communism and I will probably get to see Obama stand on White House lawn and start a camp fire with the Original Constitution. i see a Civil War in the very near future.

2. kelley
   February 7th, 2012 @ 5:42 pm

   I agree with Barbara’s sentiments.

3. ELECTOR MONITOR
   February 7th, 2012 @ 6:17 pm

   The TWO best shots to STOP the stink in the White House is at the state candidate ballot vetting and FINALLY to hold CRIMINALLY responsible the ELECTORS who vote for the POTUS in Jan.
   CRIMINAL CHARGES placed against electors needs to be researched and applied to the electors where possible.

4. Veritas
   February 7th, 2012 @ 6:32 pm

   Hannity with Stuart Varney this evening (2.7.2012):

   “He (i.e. Obama) is SHREDDING the CONSTITUTION!”

   Of course, Malihi has just helped.

   When he advised Obama that it was at his “peril” if he did not appear in court, it seems he was using TAQIYYAH!

   He said it ostensibly to throw you all off his true intentions, which seems to have been to assist Tyranny!

   A SAD DAY for America! A Sad Day for the Founding Fathers and Framers of the Constitution. A day, an era, a Usurpation of Infamy.

   God bless your efforts, Dr. Orly.

5. Christopher Collins
   February 7th, 2012 @ 6:33 pm

   https://www.examiner.com/paulding-county-republican-in-atlanta/ruling-on-obama-eligibility-case-lacked-constitutional-interpretation

6. Tony Curl
   February 7th, 2012 @ 8:54 pm

   The fight needs to go on. It’s too bad those in positions of politics need to go on fighting, too, and you do too Orly.

   But the time is right for the battle to be won.

7. Abgespacktes Feld
   February 8th, 2012 @ 2:42 am

   > and FINALLY to hold CRIMINALLY responsible the ELECTORS who vote for the POTUS in Jan.

   Useless. Even if the electors were jailed (which is highly unlikely given the way the judicial system seems to treat the eligibility issue), it wouldn’t remove Obama. *duh*

8. Larry
   February 8th, 2012 @ 3:31 pm

   just heard they are trying to get the right to fly drones over the U.S.A…..If anybody can’t post in the comments sectionwith explorer try right clicking and left click select to get the curser flashing in the comments area….hope this helps a little….this is how I posted this comment….Larry

9. Frank Coniff
   February 8th, 2012 @ 7:40 pm

   And those who fight against you win every time.
   …u mad?
   Yeah, u mad.

10. OustTheOs
    February 9th, 2012 @ 6:10 am

    We aren’t mad. Obama is mad….

11. uwho
    February 9th, 2012 @ 8:51 pm

    Frank Coniff, It’s you that should worried. GOOD ALWAYS TRIUMPS OVER EVIL. It’s all comming apart at the seams. The problem is these thugs placed their crooks in very stratigic places. But it’s only a matter of time. And if not, “you and your children have to live in the world you are creating” Hope you like it.

12. James A Davis SR
    February 10th, 2012 @ 8:39 pm

    I could kill my self for saying this.As much respect that i have for Ms Taitz and her work and she is a great patriot and i love her for what she ebodies for our country.It will come to civil war once again.There is nothing in the courts that can help.I am sorry Ms Taitz as i said you are a great patriot.The only thing that will settle the issues is an all out war against the communist.If you disagree then forgive me that is the way i see it coming to a conclusion.

13. MichaelN
    February 10th, 2012 @ 9:40 pm

    Here’s something that may help in any argument you might have with Obots about the meaning of “natural born Citizen” as found in Article II of the US Constitution.

    Basically, “natural born Citizen” in the context of USC Article II, means BOTH by descent and by native birth.

    It is IMPOSSIBLE for the word “natural”, as it is used in Article II, to mean solely native born, due to the fact that only three years after the adoption of the USC, “natural born” was used in the first Naturalization Act of 1790 to describe a child born NON-NATIVE, such a child who was born outside the limits of the US was termed “natural born” by the Congress and the Senate in 1790, based SOLELY on DESCENT.

    Sure the wording “natural born” used in 1790 act to describe a child born off-shore to US citizen parents, was dropped in the next Naturalization Act of 1795, where the child was described as a “citizen”.

    But important to note that, in the acts of 1790 and 1795, the child was in (1790)a “natural born citizen” then in (1795)a “citizen”, the child was such ONLY by DESCENT, the child not being native born.

    Remember this definition of “natural born” in 1790 by the Congress and the Senate was only three years after the adoption of the USC in 1787, with some of the congressional and senate members being the very same people who took part in the construction of the US Constitution.

    So it is IMPOSSIBLE for “natural” as used in Article II to mean solely native.

    The entire argument that the framers, in Article II of the USC, meant for “natural” to mean “native” without any regard for the citizenship of the parents dissolves.

14. James A Davis SR
    February 10th, 2012 @ 10:15 pm

    I HAD A REPLY FROM MY SENATOR jEFF Sessions FROM Alabama.I question him about Obama being eligible for the office he now holds.The only evidence he really gives is united States vs Wong Kim Ark.He never mentioned minor vs Happerstet.Forgive my spelling,but you get the message.From the white house to the halls of congress is nothing but communist.Call it however you like but i hope when this all comes down to the final stage people like Sessions do not cross my path.

Leave a Reply