Press release: ex-parte motion to expedite is submitted in CA
Posted on | September 22, 2012 | 5 Comments
Farrar order denying motion to quash subpoenas
Press release
Law Office of Orly Taitz
Ex parte motion to expedite preliminary injunction is submitted in CA
See motion attached below
Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ.
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy Suite 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Phone (949) 683-5411 fax (949) 766-7603
Email: Orly.taitz@gmail.com
CA Bar license 223433
Counselor for Plaintiffs
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
REMOVED FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
CALIFORNIA CASE 30-2012-00582135 originally captioned as Taitz v Obama, Feinstein, Emken et al
| Keith Judd, |
Orly Taitz,
Thomas G. MacLeran,
Leah Lax,
David Farrar
Larry Rappaport,
Lucien Vita
Carol Vita
Plaintiffs,
v.
barack obama , in his capacity as a candidate on the ballot for the us president in 2012 election
Natalie E. Tennant, in her capacity of West Virginia Secretary of State;
Debra Bowen, in her capacity of California Secretary of State;
Brian P. Kemp, in his capacity of Georgia Secretary of State;
William M. Gardner, in his capacity of New Hampshire Secretary of
State;
NANCY PELOSI in her capacity of the Chairwoman of the 2008 Democratic National Convention and Signor of the Certificate of Nomination for Candidate for President Obama;
MICHAEL ASTRUE in his capacity as the Commissioner of SSA;
WILLIAM A. CHATFIELD
In his capacity as former Director of the Selective Service;
ALVIN ONAKA in his capacity as
registrar of the Health Department of Hawaii;
JANET NAPOLITANO in her capacity as Secretary of Department of Homeland Security;
ERIC HOLDER in his capacity as Attorney General of the USA;
BRIAN SCHATZ in his capacity as 2008 Chairman of the Democratic party of Hawaii and Signor of the Certificate for Presidency for Barack Obama;
LYNN MATUSOW in her capacity as 2008 Secretary of the Democratic party of Hawaii and Signor of the Certificate for Presidency for Barack Obama
ALICE TRAVIS GERMOND in her capacity as a secretary of the 2008 Democratic Nominating Convention;
OBAMA FOR AMERICA;
Ballot Law Commission OF
STATE OF HEW HAMPSHIRE;
Board of directors of California Republican party;
Dean C. Logan in his capacity as Los Angeles county registrar,
ELIZABETH EMKEN in her capacity as a candidate on the ballot;
DIANNE FEINSTEIN in her capacity as a candidate on the ballot;
CLAY D. LAND in his capacity as a Federal Judge, Central District of Georgia;
John Avlon, in his capacity as a reporter for Daily Beast;
Chris Matthews in his capacity as a host of MSNBC;
MSNBC
FORBES Magazine;
Kevin Underhill in his capacity as a reporter for Forbes Magazine;
Clearchannel communications;
KFI AM 640;
John and Ken Show;
John Kobelt;
Patrick R. Donahoe in his capacity as Post Master General and Chief Executive Officer of United States Postal Service;
John Does and Jane Does
1-100; Defendants
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)Case No.:12-cv-1507
EX-PARTE mOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO HAVE AN EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY HEARD EX/PARTE OR ON A SHORTENED RESPONSE SCHEDULE
EX-PARTE mOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO HAVE AN EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY HEARD EX/PARTE OR ON A SHORTENED RESPONSE SCHEDULE
Argument
Ex parte relief should be granted if the evidence shows “that the moving party’s
cause will be irreparably prejudiced if the underlying motion is heard according to regular
noticed motion procedures.” Mission Power Eng’g Co. v. Continental Cas. Co., 883 F.
Supp. 488, 492 (C.D. Cal. 1995).
Plaintiffs incorporate by reference their First Amended Complaint and exhibits to the First Amended Complaint (Hereinafter “FAC”) as if fully pled herein.
FAC shows evidence of massive elections fraud that requires immediate attention.
1. Affidavits of Computer analyst David Yun shows that there are at least one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the current voter roll of the Secretary of State of California. In order to prevent elections fraud CA Elections Code 2150 require electors to provide their personal information in 8 different areas, such as name, birth date, prior voter registration, state where they were born or if born abroad, a country where they were born. Affidavits of David Yun show that there are 756,213 voter registrations in the Current Voter Roll of the California Secretary of state without required information on the State of Birth, 898 without the first name, 757 without the birth date and so on. Second affidavit by David Yun shows 685,739 where U.S. or U.S.A. (Exhibit 1 herein, Exhibit 18 FAC) Additionally, an e-mail from the office of the Los Angeles registrar represents an admission against interest of the defendants, where the employee admitted to falsification of records, stating that employees themselves wrote in the registration records “US” where the state of birth was missing. (Exhibit 2 herein, Exhibit 29 First amended complaint)There are 685,739 where U.S. or U.S.A was posted in the records. Even if the employees of the Registrar were not to admit to forgery and falsification of records, these registrations would not be valid, as according to Election code 2150 one needs to fill in a STATE where he was born, not just USA. Only if he was born abroad, the elector can post the name of the country. Based on this one criteria alone, without taking into consideration the other 7 areas of required information there are 1,441, 942 invalid voter registrations, nearly one and a half million invalid voter registrations. Taitz was a candidate for the U.S. Senate in 2012 primary election. The difference between her and candidate Emken, who was second and proceeded to 2012 General election was only 450,000 votes. The number of invalid voter registrations in only one of 8 categories is three times higher than Emken’s margin of victory. If an emergency stay of the CA Senatorial General election is not issued, pending removal from the voter rolls of all the invalid voter registrations and revote, Taitz will be irreparably harmed. Considering the proximity of the election, ex-parte hearing or an expedited hearing is warranted.
Additionally, both candidates, who proceeded into the top 2 general election: Senator Feinstein and the Republican Candidate Emken were served with the complaint on July 10, when the complaint was originally filed in the state court. They did not respond yet and chose to ignore the complaint believing that no judge will have the strength of character to stay the Senatorial election and that every judge will do what is usually done in elections fraud cases: find some lame excuse to dismiss the complaint. As Senator Feinstein has a much higher number of votes than Emken, the only defendant, who can be affected by the Ex-Parte is Emken, and she had over 2 months notice already and cannot claim detriment by ex-parte.
2. Plaintiff Keith Judd is a Candidate for the U.S. Presidency, who got 40% of the vote in West Virginia Primary. Judd has standing to seek an ex-parte hearing as exhibits 1-35 of the FAC show overwhelming evidence that the winner of the WV Democratic primary, Barack Obama, placed his name on the ballot by fraud and using forged Selective Service certificate, forged birth Certificate and a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425, which according to E-verify and SSNVS was never assigned to Obama, but is being used by him as his verification of identity as late as in April 15, 2010, as posted on his tax returns. If ex-parte hearing is not held, due to upcoming 2012 General Presidential election Judd’s rights as a candidate will be irreparably harmed. On the other hand, the only defendant, who would be affected by such ex-parte is Defendant Obama. He cannot be possibly harmed by such order, as he was served here and was served to appear in court in similar cases and he simply arrogantly chose to be in contempt of court and not appear. Exhibit 3 herein represents an order by a Deputy Chief administrative Judge of the State of Georgia, Michael Malihi in response to a motion by Obama to quash subpoenas issued by Attorney Taitz. Malihi ruled in Taitz favor and upheld the subpoenas issued by Taitz for Obama and other officials to appear in court and submit his identification papers. Obama decided to go behind the back of the presiding judge and on the eve of the hearing Obama, through his attorney Michael Jablonski, submitted a letter to the Secretary of State of Georgia, Brian Kemp, asking him to take the case away from the Deputy Chief Administrative Judge Malihi as he (Obama) is supposedly suffers from Taitz. Secretary of State Kemp responded that if Obama boycotts the hearing and does not show up, he is doing so in his own peril. Obama and Jablonski did not show up and did not provide any documents. Similarly, Obama was subpoenaed to appear at the elections Commission hearing in the state of Indiana, where Taitz presented evidence of forgery in his IDs. Obama boycotted this hearing as well. A hearing on the Indiana challenge is scheduled for September 26, 2012, 1:30 pm in the Indiana Superior Court before Judge Sherry K Reid in Indianapolis, Indiana. Clearly, if Obama had any valid IDs, he would show up for the court hearings or he would have sent his attorneys with required documents. The only reasonable explanation why Obama is boycotting the court hearings, is because he knows that there is no legitimate reason or explanation for his use of a Connecticut Social Security number which was never assigned to him according to E-verify and SSNVS and there is no explanation or justification for hiding the original application for the Selective Service and Birth Certificate, when alleged copies were shown to be forgeries. As Obama boycotted prior hearings and showed a complete disrespect and contempt for the Court of Law, there is no reason to believe that he will act any differently and there is no reason not to grant the plaintiffs their motion for the ex-parte hearing or alternatively a motion for an expedited hearing on the motion to stay Obama’s placement on the ballot in general election or certification of his votes for the general election until the original identification papers are examined by experts in light of forgery in his alleged copies.
CONCLUSION
Motion for Stay/ Preliminary Injunction of the 2012 California Senatorial election, as well as 2012 Certification of Barack Obama as a Presidential candidate should be held ex-parte. In alternative such motion should be heard on expedited schedule to be set by the court.
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
09.21.2012
Cc
Darrel Issa
Chairman of the House oversight committee
2157 Rayburn House Office Building,
Washington, DC 20515
Congressman Lamar Smith,
Chairman of the Judiciary Committee
House of Representative
2409 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515
Public Integrity Unit Department of Justice
U.S. Department of Justice
Criminal Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N W Washington, DC 20530-0001
Michael E. Horowitz Inspector General Department of J ustice
Office of the Inspector General
U.S. Depru1ment of Justice
950 Pennsyl vania Avenue, N.W. Room 4706
Wash ington, D.C. 20530
UN Nations committee for civil rights defenders
OHCHR i n New York
UN Headquarters
New York, NY 1 0017
USA
Inter-American Com mission for Human rights
1889 F St., NW,
Washi ngton, D.C., USA 20006
Comments
5 Responses to “Press release: ex-parte motion to expedite is submitted in CA”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
September 22nd, 2012 @ 4:22 pm
September 22nd, 2012 @ 5:17 pm
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. what you are asking in your EX-PARTE Motion from the U.S. District Court, Central district of California, they should certainly grant you, if they are HONEST.
If they refuse to grant you what you are requesting they themselves have AIDING AN ABETTED A CRIMINAL, which in its self also makes them CRIMINALS TOO.
Why are all the Courts elevating Barack H. Obama above any and all Laws. That’s completely UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
The Courts have be treating Barack H. obama as if he is the “SUPREME BEING” that doesn’t have to go by, or obey any laws.
If any one of us had the BIRTH CERTIFICATE, SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER, SELECTIVE SERVICE Problems that Back H. Obama has, we would have been ARRESTED and CONVICTED of FORGERY, STEALING, and FRAUD more than four years age, and now would be SERVING TIME in a Federal Prison.
The Courts knowS exactly who and what Barack H. Obama is.
What’s making them play so DUMB. Are they all Scared for their Lives.
What Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. has filed with all the different Courts, they if they had an honest bone in their bodies, they would immediately have Barack H. Obama arrested for CONTEMPT of COURT, then have him come face to face with Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. in Court to face all the charges she has filed against him on numerous occasions.
That’s exactly what the Courts would do if it was you or me.
Once again, how can all the courts get away with elevating Barack H. Obama above the Law. There is nothing in our U.S. Constitution giving the Courts the right to do such a thing.
We are all suppose to be EQUAL UNDER THE LAW.
Come on all you Judges WISE UP, before our country is completely destroyed because you Judges have be scared to death to give Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. even the time of day in all your courts. Shame, shame on you.
I’ve been searching for somebody to come on this WEB-SITE and show where what Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. is wrong in any way, shape or fashsion. Maybe on of you Judges could do that.
So far all you Judges have been able to hide behind is that outrageously UNCONSTITUTIONAL “NO STANDING” ruling you keep pulling out of the GARBAGE PAIL.
When you look at what our COURT SYSTEM has been doing to Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. this sure does not look anything like what America is suppose to be. FREEDOM AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
September 22nd, 2012 @ 5:25 pm
September 22nd, 2012 @ 5:27 pm
DR ORLY, I AM NOT SURE WHAT ALL OF THIS MEANS BUT I DID RECOGNIZE NATALIE TENNANTS NAME. THE MAJORITY OF WEST VIRGINIANS DO NOT LIKE BO AND FEEL AS I DO THAT HE IS NOT ELIGIBLE. I AM SO GLAD THIS MAN RUN ON THE TICKET. BUT WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?
September 22nd, 2012 @ 11:55 pm
Orly: your list of the “Who’s Who of Constitutional Criminals” is breathtaking! I don’t think that there is any other line-up anywhere of true characters that are walking “felony factories?” And this may not be all of them? Wow!