Posted on | September 17, 2012 | 4 Comments
Activity in Case 8:12-cv-01507-JST-JPR Keith Judd et al v. Barack Obama et al Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8)
Inbox |
cacd_ecfmail@cacd.uscourts.gov
<cacd_ecfmail@cacd.uscourts.gov> |
Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:59 AMTo: ecfnef@cacd.uscourts.gov
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Notice of Electronic Filing
The following transaction was entered on 9/17/2012 at 8:59 AM PDT and filed on 9/10/2012
| Case Name: |
Keith Judd et al v. Barack Obama et al |
| Case Number: |
8:12-cv-01507-JST-JPR |
| Filer: |
|
| Document Number: |
3 |
| |
|
Docket Text:
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed.(nbo)
8:12-cv-01507-JST-JPR Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Orly Taitz     orly.taitz@gmail.com
8:12-cv-01507-JST-JPR Notice has been delivered by First Class U. S. Mail or by other means BY THE FILER to :
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Document description:Main Document
Original filename:SA12CV01507JST-ADR.pdf
Electronic document Stamp:
[STAMP cacdStamp_ID=1020290914 [Date=9/17/2012] [FileNumber=14314586-0
] [3ed038261153ead9d248c0e7e83633db70fc1332ddb71bacaa171a61846a1b815b5
842ea47af327979ea45ee2147155f3eb53256a9af2caf82134091d46c525e]]
|
|
|
Comments
September 17th, 2012 @ 8:55 am
September 17th, 2012 @ 9:04 am
Delay, delay, delay?
September 17th, 2012 @ 12:36 pm
Mediation? That makes absolutely no sense!
September 17th, 2012 @ 3:26 pm
Doesn’t this put any hearing past the elections? What can you do to invalidate this Order? Does the fact that the Order was issued by an Obama appointee mean that you should move to have the case re-assigned and demand an immediate trial?