12 Responses to “‘HONEY BOO BOO’ TIES BUBBA SPEECH IN RATINGS…”

1. raicha
   September 6th, 2012 @ 8:47 pm

   From that article:
   “(Aggregate coverage of the DNC clearly eclipsed Honey Boo Boo by all measurements, and DNC ratings reflect the entire 10 p.m. hour, with Honey Boo Boo only airing from 10 to 10: 30 p.m.)”

2. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   September 7th, 2012 @ 1:20 am

   Ray, I know you are an Obama person, but don’t you ever care about this nation? Honey Boo boo is a joke. Ususrpation of the U.S. Presidentcy is not a joke. You are an attorney, I see you in court. What are you doing? Why are you aiding and abetting forgery and elections fraud?

3. raicha
   September 7th, 2012 @ 5:43 am

   Actually, you don’t know that I am an Obama person. My interest is in accuracy and candor in the courts and media. So when you pull items out of context and misstate facts or law, I comment. When people tie up the courts with their political arguments, I comment. The process for addressing your complaints is in the voting booth and in the Congress, not in the courts. You have been told that by the courts. And yet you continue to clog the dockets while others with standing and justiciable grievances wait up to five years for their day in court or pay thousands of dollars for private arbitration. I am aiding and abetting nothing. I am an American citizen exercising my Constitutional rights, including my vote.

4. FedupwDC
   September 7th, 2012 @ 6:02 am

   It’s pretty obvious Ray aka raicha has been bought and paid for by the Demoturds.

5. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   September 7th, 2012 @ 6:56 am

   this is a complete BS, courts never said any of this. when a candidate on the ballot is using forged IDs , he needs to be removed from the ballot, prosecuted and sent to prison. unfortunately corrupt judges are refusing to follow the law and evidence

6. The Phoenix
   September 7th, 2012 @ 9:16 am

   Raicha: the only people in America who love the DNC & (D)’s are OUT OF THEIR FREAKIN’ MINDS! Okay? End of discussion!

7. raicha
   September 7th, 2012 @ 9:44 am

   Then I guess you have forgotten what Judge Carter wrote in the order dismissing Barnett v. Obama:

   “There may very well be a legitimate role for the judiciary to interpret whether the natural-born citizen requirement has been satisfied in the case of a presidential candidate who has not already won the election and taken office. However, on the day that President Obama took the presidential oath and was sworn in, he became President of the United States. Any removal of him from the presidency must be accomplished through the Constitution’s mechanisms for the removal of a President, either through impeachment or the succession process set forth in the Twenty-Fifth Amendment. Plaintiffs attempt to subvert this grant of power to Congress by convincing the Court that it should disregard the constitutional procedures in place for the removal of a sitting president. The process for removal of a sitting president–removal for any reason–is within the province of Congress, not the courts.”

8. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   September 7th, 2012 @ 10:40 am

   come on, you are not that stupid. The whole point of us suing now, is that we are suing him as a candidate in 2012 election, not a President who got into office in 2008

9. Robert
   September 7th, 2012 @ 10:49 am

   Raicha does not understand that Dr. Taitz readily admits that any cases which remain pending after November 6 will be moot and don’t stand a chance.

   Dr. Taitz, which of your cases do you think has the best chance of being heard before November 6? That’s the one you should be focusing all your time on.

10. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    September 7th, 2012 @ 12:38 pm

    they do not need to be heard before November, they need to be filed before November, which they were.
    Also, do not concede that you have no standing to sue a criminal who got in the WH by fraud and forgery, but it is simply easier to sue him during the election time

11. Nick
    September 8th, 2012 @ 8:50 am

    Didn’t Honey Boo Boo pull in higher ratings than the Republican National Convention? If so, what’s the point of making this an issue as to the DNC?

12. Nick
    September 8th, 2012 @ 8:51 am

    Didn’t Honey Boo Boo pull in higher ratings than the Republican National Convention? If so, what’s the point of making this an issue as to the DNC?

Leave a Reply