Main NH Daily Paper, “Concord Monitor” will be at the hearing tomorrow
Posted on | November 17, 2011 | 10 Comments
I just gave an interview Dan Spolar from “Concord Monitor”. They will be at the hearing tomorrow.
I found out, how the committee is formed. there are 5 members and 5 alternates. 2 are appointed by the governor, 2 by lieutenant governor, 4 by the President of the State Senate.
The Chairman of the Committee Brett E. Cook is an attorney. I believe, the name of the firm is Sheehan law. I am a little concerned. Every time there are appointed members, particularly appointed attorneys, problems arise. On the bright side, these people are right there, they need to live amongst the citizens of the state. How will they look in the eyes of their friends and neighbors and explain, how they allowed a person with a stolen SSN and a forged BC on the ballot. I need as much info as possible about this committee.
Comments
10 Responses to “Main NH Daily Paper, “Concord Monitor” will be at the hearing tomorrow”
Leave a Reply
November 17th, 2011 @ 12:13 pm
Hi Orly,
Thank you very much for your tireless efforts. If this thing ever comes to the end it will be because of you and your persistence.
I just read through your NH complaint, unfortunately the scribed document is missing page 13. Could you please add that page to scribd? You may want to also check that what you filed included that page.
thanks jd
November 17th, 2011 @ 1:44 pm
Dr Taitz, if the person named Sheehan is related to Marty Sheehan of MA. then you can bet they are uber liberal lol.
Time to get all the corrupt politicians out !
YOU GO DOC !!!
November 17th, 2011 @ 2:28 pm
The presentment of facts will reveal the integrity of the Election board. Truth stands and will incriminate or liberate. The very least any board can do is investigate the crimes before barry goes on the ballot. The present facts confirmed and compiled by reputable sources show a fraud has/is taking place in our Republic.
Since barry is on record saying “those that refuse transparency have something to hide”. We should take him at his word and he shouldn’t mind one bit if his records are demanded to prove his eligibility. Right?
November 17th, 2011 @ 5:48 pm
You mailed the required written notice to the candidate, yes?
November 17th, 2011 @ 6:04 pm
“How will they look in the eyes of their friends and neighbors and explain, how they allowed a person with a stolen SSN and a forged BC on the ballot”
If indeed they knowingly allowed such, they could not.
November 17th, 2011 @ 7:46 pm
I’m confused. From what I’ve read, the constitution doesn’t require, a valid social security number. So why, bring it up? It can backfire, as a smear if the commission, doesn’t believe your investigators. Are they, going to be there, to testify and be cross-examined?
Oh, and did you, get notice to the Obama regime? That had to be, done when you filed your complaint. I saw, that impressive list, of people you cc’d but I didn’t see the Obama regime or the Obama campaign. Will, that be a problem?
November 17th, 2011 @ 10:59 pm
I’m sure everything will unfold as it should.
Keep up the hard work!
November 18th, 2011 @ 4:41 pm
…hearing tomorrow…
When we were “punks” in high school during the 70s the ‘cops’ would compound charges if they thought one of us were out of line in a traffic stop:
1. Speeding
2. Wreckless Endangerment
3. Excessive Use of Power (I never hear
of this nowadays)
4. Driving too Fast For Conditons;
rain, curve,intersection, pedestrians
5. Expired/Lapsed Insurance,Registration,
Inspection, as applicable
6. Driving after curfew, if applicable
7. NOT Disorderly Conduct: Contempt was
something none of us would dream of.
…some help should N.H. smell the rat.
November 19th, 2011 @ 8:48 am
Great points, Brian. But how, do they apply to New Hampshire?
November 19th, 2011 @ 6:14 pm
Insight, point is, back in the 70s punks like you would be stuffed in a plastic trash can as a wreckloose troublemaker (someone else would have to extract you).