OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

More on Supreme Court

Posted on | July 4, 2009 | 1 Comment

Bob

“She asked if I am an ambassador and I told her that I am not and I don’t have to be. Constitution does not specify that the ambassadors have to be plaintiffs, which means that they can be defendants.”

If this clerk is going to be deciding which cases go forward or not, she should at least research the precedents of the court she is working for regarding the issue at hand. Orly is correct. Ambassadors and ministers do not have to be the plaintiffs:

Boers v. Preston, 111 U.S. 252 (1884)

The plaintiff below, Preston, was a citizen of that state, while the defendant was the consul at the port of New York for the Kingdoms of Norway and Sweden.

 Update
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

One Response to “More on Supreme Court”

  1. Civis naturaliter natus
    July 4th, 2009 @ 1:04 pm

    Excellent work, Orly!

    So many constitutional scholars say that one special jurisdiction can never be cited by the common citizen as cause for filing at the supreme court.

    You’ve done your homework and proved them wrong.

    Cite the precedent, and if they deny to hear the case, they have abdicated all authority to defend the Constitution…