OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Emergency petition submitted in HI prior to November 30 hearing

Posted on | November 11, 2011 | 3 Comments

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESq

29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

ph 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603

orly.taitz@gmail.com

11.09.2011  

Via Certified mail

Return Receipt

Attention

Loretta Fuddy

Director of Health

State of Hawai’i

1250 Punchbowl str.

Honolulu, HI

Alvin Onaka

Registrar

Department of Health

1250 Punchbowl str.

Honolulu, HI

Jill T. Nagamine

Deputy Attorney General

State of Hawai’i

465 South King str. Room 200

Honolulu HI, 96813

DEMAND FOR EMERGENCY AGENCY HEARING REGARDING REQUEST FOR INSPECTION OF THE ORIGINAL RECORD IN CUSTODY OF THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH IN LIEU OF THE ALLEGED CERTIFIED COPY INTRODUCED BY  CHIEF JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROYCE C. LAMBERTH IN A CONTESTED HEARING IN TAITZ V RUEMMLER  11-CV-421 RCL USDC DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Dear Director Fuddy, Registrar Onaka, Deputy Atorney General  Nagamine.

Petitioner herein is requesting an emergency agency hearing in the department of Health of the State of Hawai’i on her request for inspection of the original 1961 long form  birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama, II, in lieu of an alleged copy of the above document, which was introduced sua sponte by federal judge Royce C. Lamberth in a contested hearing in the matter of Taitz v Ruemmler, filed by the petitioner Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ against White House Counsel Kathy Ruemmler.

Recently,  Judge Royce Lamberth of the USDC District of Columbia issued an order in  Taitz v Ruemmler 11-cv-421 RCL USDC DC   where he stated “The President released his long form birth certificate on April 27, 2011, and posted a copy on the White House Web site. The certificate confirms the President’s birth in Honolulu Hawaii. See Michel D. Sheer, “With Document, Obama seeks to end “Birther issue”, The new York Times, Apr 28, 2011, at A1”(Exhibit 12 order by Judge Lamberth).

Previously Petitioner herein provided director Fuddy, Registrar Onaka and Deputy Attorney General Nagamine with expert affidavits, showing, that alleged true and correct copy of Obama’s certified 1961 long form birth certificate represents a computer generated forgery and not a copy of an original 1961 document. Evidence rules of the state of Hawaii are similar to Federal rules of Evidence.   State of Hawai’i Title 8, statute 91-10(2) states “Documentary evidence may be received in the form of copies of excerpts, if the original is not readily available, provided that upon request parties shall be given an opportunity to compare with the original.”  Original, referred to in this petition, is readily available and is kept in the department of Health of Hawai’i.

 Federal Rule of Evidence 1002 states that “[t]o prove the content of a writing, recording or photograph, the original writing, recording, or photograph is required, except as otherwise provided in these rules or by Act of Congress.”  With regard to duplicates and public or official records, the rules state in pertinent part as follows:

A “duplicate” is a counterpart produced by the same impression as the original,… or by mechanical or electronic re-recording,… or by other equivalent techniques which accurately reproduce the original. Federal Rule of Evidence 1001(4).

A duplicate is admissible to the same extent as an original unless (l) a genuine question is raised as to the authenticity of the original or (2) in the circumstances it would be unfair to admit the duplicate in lieu of the original. Federal Rule of Evidence 1003. (emphasis added)

Petitioner is not requesting disclosure of any information, which was not previously disclosed . Petitioner is requesting inspection of the original document in lieu of the alleged certified copy , which was provided by Mr. Obama to the public and which was used by Judge Lamberth  in his opinion in a contested case, heard in the U.S. District court for the District of Columbia, and in light of multiple affidavits of experts, previously provided to the agency, which deem the alleged copy to be a computer generated forgery.

Petitioner is requesting such hearing on an emergency basis, as it pertains to legitimacy of the U.S. presidency and in light of the fact, that 2012 Presidential  primary is on the way.

Sincerely,

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

11.09.2011

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

3 Responses to “Emergency petition submitted in HI prior to November 30 hearing”

  1. ch
    November 11th, 2011 @ 12:59 pm

    Has the Media abandoned their poster boy? Orly, have you seen the new Time Magazine? Hilary Clinton is featured on the cover and the biggest surprise is a long article inside by Chris Matthews, filling pages with his disappointment in Obama. Long article! You might find it interesting. I have to now feel sorry for Chris Matthews, that he cannot tell the difference between a long-form birth certificate and a forged short form. It is commendable that he is publicly expressing his disappointment in a national magazine, which indicates the national media has lost enthusiasm for their poster boy. Chris did not address the cornerstone issue of the forged birth documents, but he did repeatedly express his disappointment in Obama, who was charismatic in his campaign and is totally failing as a leader. Your untiring efforts have accomplished this “crack in the wall.” Others have also battled, but nobody like you. Thanks from all of us!

  2. Insight
    November 11th, 2011 @ 3:46 pm

    Pure, genius.

  3. Jason
    November 12th, 2011 @ 2:58 pm

    Please elaborate on this. Are you saying that since Judge Lamberth’s ruling was based on a certified copy that he claimed existed then you have a right to compare the certified copy with the original?

Leave a Reply