Posted on | June 23, 2009 | 21 Comments
From:
To:
dr_taitz@yahoo.com
Question to ask the Obama Camp….
During the election, then Senator Obama published a statement on his website which said that his birth status was “governed” by the British Nationality Act of 1948. Can you please tell the American people how a natural born citizen of the United States can be governed at birth – by British law?
CA
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
21 Responses to “”
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
June 23rd, 2009 @ 5:51 pm
Now that is a very good question. It demands an answer from the Supreme Court – ASAP
June 23rd, 2009 @ 6:40 pm
Strange thing to say. Why would he feel the need to say this? And, EXACTLY what does this mean? IF he were born in Hawaii (I don’t believe he was), how does the British rule of anything come in to play? Is there actual audio/video documentation of this?
June 23rd, 2009 @ 6:55 pm
JMe…
Barry’s dad was a British subject at his time of birth. Kenya was a BRITISH COLONY.
Obama is on record that his birth status was governed by British law…hence HE CAN NOT BE A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN of the United States even if he was born in Hawaii. That is the most obvious of several issues that preclude his eligibility to be POTUS.
Thus Barry, “Can you please tell the American people how a natural born citizen of the United States can be governed at birth – by British law?” BINGO! Good-bye! Off to jail or deport him back to Indonesia a really large Muslim country.
June 23rd, 2009 @ 7:27 pm
He was trying to trip us up; by stating fact, we wouldn’t question it. Backwards thinking, reverse psychology…except it didn’t work, did it Barry?
June 23rd, 2009 @ 7:59 pm
A huge giant shout out for Dr. Orly Many thousands THANKS !.
A brief note from us who have been dogging this trail and story from the ‘very’ beginiing. First the health and well-fare for Dr. Taitz is of the utmost importance. All that can be done should be done to meet this issue head on.
Second, The infinite amount of details has been absolutely unbelievable. The one most outstanding quality about this case is this, that the effort and thought having gone into looking under every single rock is phenomenal and boarding amazing.
The Grand Canyon file of information being brought forth is stagering.
If anyone thinks this is overwhelming, imagine what the Obots are going thru now at this point in time. If hundreds of thousands of dollars were spent on merely hidding a real birth certificate, the dollars spent on asprin alone will be in the millions.
Dr. Taitz, Stay Well. Stay Focused. Stay Safe. Stay the course.
Best Regards from all us here in Oregon.
F. A. Leonetti
June 23rd, 2009 @ 8:21 pm
FactCheck.org Clarifies Barack’s Citizenship
“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”
June 23rd, 2009 @ 8:37 pm
I don’t recall any such statement on his website.
While there might have been one, the fact you recalled it says you found it notable.
Since it was notable to you (and likely others), did you take a screenshot of this statement?
Did anyone else?
Sorry. I just find it odd that if Obama himself provided evidence then, why has no one since claimed such.
Why weren’t earlier cases based upon this statement especially when the source was Obama himself?
I’ve never seen a single mention or screenshot of this statement in all this time.
June 23rd, 2009 @ 9:55 pm
“Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro is an illegal alien, using forged documents to gain employment in the United States.”
How 100% completely factual & 100% true, and very well said syc1959.
I am working on DEFINING ALL OF THE SERIAL CURRENT & PAST LIFE-LONG CRIMES and CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS that Soetoro/Obama is & has been committing in America FOR YEARS against citizens in America, and against America now in ALL 50 states, so I can turn the SERIAL CRIMES OF SOETORO/OBAMA INTO A 50 STATE CIVIL RIGHTS CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST BARRY SOETORO/OBAMA.
I am currently working on making a LONG list of ALL of the PROVEN illegal crimes that Soetoro is committing for which WE THE PEOPLE IN SEVERAL CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT WILL DEMAND THAT IMMEDIATE CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS BE STARTED IMMEDIATELY ON OBAMA SO WE CAN LEGALLY GET OBAMA REMOVED BEFORE HE DESTROYS ALL AMERICANS & THE USA CONSTITUTION, & THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS THIS IS HIS GOAL.
I have several ideas for several different kinds of CLASS ACTIONS LAWSUITS. WE THE PEOPLE need to start marching openly. WE THE PEOPLE MUST SHOW ALL OF THE USA GOVERNMENT officials in NO UNCERTAIN TERMS that Americans in the United States Of America are a nation of laws and Americans directly reign, rule,and govern the USA Federal government NOT the other way around.
June 23rd, 2009 @ 10:24 pm
did you hear back from Jefferson County DA Tom Mannis? I need a response one way or another so I’ll submit it to Gov Perry
June 24th, 2009 @ 12:39 am
FactCheck.org Clarifies Barack’s Citizenship
“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”
I just copied and pasted this off Factcheck link at 9:37 pm June 23, 2009.
June 24th, 2009 @ 1:24 am
It is a known fact, and has been for a very long time, that Obama was a dual citizen at birth, British/American. “Natural Born Citizen” is not “defined” anywhere in the constitution. However, it has been the prevailing law (and more than likely will continue to be so) that dual citizenship does not disqualify him or anyone else from NBC.
At approximately Obama’s age of 2 Kenya gained independence from Britain. His father then became a Kenyan citizen. If that passed to his son, he was then Kenyan/American, and if not, still British/American. That citizenship, without declaring it or renouncing his U.S. citizenship, expired in approximately 1983, at which time his only citizenship was American.
The ONLY disqualifying instance would be proven Kenyan birth. None of the other stuff out there, Indonesia/Pakistan/adoption, and the like, has any bearing on his NBC status.
Should the laws be changed? NBC definitely defined? Probably so. But as of now that is the prevailing law as it’s been interpreted many times over.
I know no one wants to hear it or believe it, but that is just the way it is, whether we like it or not.
June 24th, 2009 @ 1:55 am
Another question to ask them is this :
Since you have already posted a supposedly authentic copy of the COLB online for all the world to see, why does Obama continuously challenge any attempt from a third party to access a copy for themselves? After all, as you said, you already released a copy online. Why all the stonewalling ?
June 24th, 2009 @ 8:59 am
A little off topic. But this is for those of you that may have visited my site Hall of Shame last week. Well, the Obots struck. They reported it to Google as a site containing malicious software ( which is TOTALLY false. It contains nothing but text and pictures. People can check the page coding themselves ). When you visit the site through Firefox ( maybe IE ) , you get a message that the site is infected. You can just click Ignore and continue. Better, you can go to the mirror address:
https://hallofshame.cjb.net
Since it is a redirector, it is not affected the false Google reporting.
I guess I must have hit a sore spot with the libs. But they are typical libs. They just can’t face the truth so they try to shut you up.
June 24th, 2009 @ 10:50 am
Dr Taitz, could you provide a link to the referenced statement in your post above/ I am having quite the time finding it. From there I can look further into why he made this statement.
June 24th, 2009 @ 7:50 pm
Yes, We the People need to march openly and make demands. The business of sending letters that they don’t read and making calls that their clerks answer is foolhardy and a waste of time and resources. The only way they’ll wake up is when they see people in the streets or see people pounding on their doors demanding action.
June 25th, 2009 @ 12:00 pm
I saved the part of the site that said t5hat. I will try to mail it too orly as soon as I figure out how to get it off the read bit latre thingy in my browser
June 26th, 2009 @ 11:35 am
SENATOR RICHARD J. DURBIN
The second issue is one that has been historic, and that is the question of dual loyalties. I am Catholic. There was a time in the 19th century when being Catholic virtually disqualified you from being seriously considered for the highest office in the land. Why? Because they believed these papists would listen to advice from the Vatican before the American people. Well, thank goodness that came to an end in 1960 with the election of President Kennedy. It appears not to be an issue—and perhaps it will not be—on November 2nd. But the point is that is no longer a debate topic.
Some raise the question about dual loyalty of Jewish-Americans. Can they be loyal to America and to Israel? Now we come into another aspect of this dual loyalty question, which we have talked about in general terms, but Dr. Spalding has raised in specific terms. And this is where I come to my question. A friend of mine by the name of Val Adamkus was born in Lithuania. He as a young boy fought the Nazis when they occupied Lithuania, then fought the Soviets when they occupied Lithuania, and left that country to come to the United States to become a naturalized citizen. He received the highest award in civil service in America for his service to our Government. And then after his retirement from our Federal Government and after the liberation of Lithuania from the Soviet Union, he returned to Lithuania and was elected President of that country. An amazing story.
But there is one footnote most people don’t realize. In the closing moments before he was sworn in as President of Lithuania, he surrendered his American citizenship. He didn’t feel that he could serve the people of Lithuania if there was ever any question about his loyalty.
Dr. Spalding, you raised that point. We live in a world where people can be dual citizens. Is that an important part of this discussion? Should we in some way or another make it clear that you have to renounce other citizenships to be considered as President, even as a naturalized citizen?
Or should we trust the crucible of the campaign, let the people decide as to whether a person’s first loyalty will be America?
June 27th, 2009 @ 5:20 pm
sorry, Mr. Ryan- dual citizenship disqualified him. There is no law allowing one with allegiance to other country to be POTUS. You are making up law, it is your wishfull thinking
June 27th, 2009 @ 6:08 pm
Dr. Taitz,
Is there a law that specifically addresses dual-citizenship? I keep trying to find one for one of my obot sisters and am having a hard time finding a law that directly says a citizen who was at one time a dual-citizen is not a NBC or qualified to be POTUS once dual-citizenship has been lost and thus the dual-citizen is just an Ameican citizen. There are theories about Vattel and such, but I a looking for a law on the books.
Any help by you or your supporters would be helpful. Maybe I just don’t know how to search for what I am looking for.
June 28th, 2009 @ 12:46 pm
Sorry Orly. You are the one withthe wishful thinking.
Joseph Mandoli was a dual US/Italian citizen by birth (born in the US to Italian parents). He left the US as an infant and moved to Italy with his parents. When he sought to return to the US in 1937, the Supreme Court ruled that he was a natural-born US citizen.
https://www.richw.org/dualcit/cases.html#Mandoli
———————————
dr_taitz@yahoo.com says:
June 27, 2009 at 5:20 pm
sorry, Mr. Ryan- dual citizenship disqualified him. There is no law allowing one with allegiance to other country to be POTUS. You are making up law, it is your wishfull thinking
June 28th, 2009 @ 12:52 pm
Sorry
you don’t know what you are talking about .Mandoli v Acheson deals with citizenship, it does not deal with the Natural Born Citizenship status. Read the case again, it never mentions Natural Born Citizen and has nothing to do with qualification for presidency. ditto for Elg, I might add