7 Responses to “CA bar finds the matter of Obama’s use of forged IDs to be a matter of national security which needs to be handled by the courts and the law enforcement”

1. Maggie May
   August 12th, 2012 @ 2:45 pm

   I don’t read it that way. They wrote your complaint is a matter of national security and beyond the scope of the California Bar. To me, that doesn’t say they think it is a matter of national security but that you think it is a matter of national security.

   But if you think it says what it says, you should be submitting it with every thing you submit to the courts. From the perspective of many, it is the belief the letter was merely a way of passing the buck on to someone else.

2. Harry
   August 12th, 2012 @ 4:32 pm

   in the bible God asked Noah to find one good man in Sodom- and today we are looking for only one honest judge in America that cant be bribed or blackmailed into revoking the oath that they took to America and to God to defend our constitution- Is this incredible or what?- How many men have died on our battlefields defending our constitution that is worthless under the evil FRAUD Obama- ???

3. Oliver Wendell Holmes
   August 12th, 2012 @ 4:48 pm

   All of the Courts that Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. has APPEARED and/or FILED her CASES in seems to be CHAMPION BUCK PASSERS.

   Too Bad a Harry S. Truman Type, wasn’t in one of those Courts, he would have never HIDE behind a “NO STANDING” RULING, like so many of today’s Judges are doing. He would declare “THE BUCK STOPS HERE” and then make a CONSTITUTION CORRECT RULING, after examining all the EVIDENCE and listening to all the WITNESSES.

   Can anybody out there figure out why all the Courts that had a chance to “RULE” are just “BUCK PASSERS” when it come to a CONSTITUTIONAL RULING on Barry Sneaky’s ELIGIBILITY?

   Normally a Judge would jump at the chance to make such a Ruling. It would be in almost all cases the HIGH LITE of their JUDICIAL CAREER.

   Why are all all these COURTS REFUSES to even take a look at Dr. Orly Taitz Esq.’s EVIDENCE or listen to her WITNESSES? Are they SCARED of what they might SEE/HEAR, or do they just think it’s just not important enough for them to give Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. the TIME OF DAY IN THEIR COURTROOM?

   I think we all know the ANSWER to that!

   Why don’t All American Citizens have “STANDING” in a COURT OP LAW when it comes to examining Barry Sneaky’s alleged LACK OF LEGAL, or use of FRAUDULENT DOCUMENTS?

   Doesn’t Barry Sneaky work for all of us?

4. Don B.
   August 12th, 2012 @ 8:13 pm

   Every media outlet in the country should be addressing this story.

   California Bar Association has determined that forged identity concerns are a matter of National Security.

5. JAK
   August 12th, 2012 @ 9:02 pm

   The judges perform this way because many if not most are nothing more than societal parasites using their powers of appointment only when it demonstrates their authority. I know from experience judges can be bought and self serving. Where they are fallible is when the unexpected truth is outed and they have to face the consequences of their devious decisions. We must make them face the reality of true justice.

6. hb
   August 13th, 2012 @ 10:06 am

   Harry above…It was Lott not Noah who God asked that of.

Leave a Reply