New filing with the Supreme Court, Cover page

Posted on | June 16, 2009 | 6 Comments

No. _______________

In The

Easterling et al., Movants, Applicants, & Complainants

v.

Barack Obama et al., Respondents

_________________________________________________

RULE 17 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING INCLUDING BILL OF COMPLAINT AND APPLICATION FOR WRIT IN OR PER QUO WARRANTO

Rule 17.3-17.4 of the Rules of This United States Supreme Court state as follows:

3. The initial pleading shall be preceded by a motion for leave to file, and may be accompanied by a brief in support of the motion. Forty copies of each document shall be filed, with proof of service. Service shall be as required by Rule 29, except that when an adverse party is a State, service shall be made on both the Governor and the Attorney General of that State.

4. The case will be placed on the docket when the motion for leave to file and the initial pleading are filed with the Clerk. The Rule 38(a) docket fee shall be paid at that time.

In compliance with and pursuant to Rule 17.3 of the Rules of this Court, Movants seek leave of court to file an Emergency Motion for Stay and Bill of Complaint within the Original Jurisdiction of this Court.  Specifically, Movants ask this Court to exercise its original jurisdiction to determine a civil action in or per quo warranto concerning the President of the United States and meanwhile to temporarily stay or enjoin certain critical constitutional functions from being exercised by the President during the determination of this action in or per quo warranto, namely (1) the appointment of any person to serve as the US attorney for the District of Columbia and (2) appointment and the confirmation of any person as a new Supreme Court Justice to replace retiring Justice David Souter until eligibility /legitimacy of Mr. Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro for the position of the president of the United States and Commander in Chief can established as a matter of constitutional law.

Movants submit that their Application for Stay and Bill of Complaint may and should only be heard in this Supreme Court, in that only this Supreme Court of the United States has the magisterial dignity and authority properly to decided and adjudicate such a determination in or per quo warranto of the eligibility of Mr. Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro to exercise the constitutional offices and duties of President of the United states.  Furthermore, only this United States Supreme Court has the magisterial dignity and authority effectively to apply the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Evidence to and as against and concerning high officers of this and other countries. 

Such application of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is expressly authorized by Rule 17.2 of the Rules of this Court, and in regard to a matter which will attract unparalleled national and international scrutiny thereby to supervise the normally mundane and routine process of discovery under those Rules, including but not limited to granting motions to compel or other mandates for production of documents such as vital, statistical, and otherwise (normally) confidential records concerning or relating to Barack Hussein Obama which be served upon Ms. Hillary Clinton in her capacity as the Secretary of State, Mr. Robert Gates in his capacity as the Secretary of Defense, Ms. Linda Lingle in her capacity as the governor of Hawaii, His Excellency Peter N.R.O Ogengo, the right Honorable Ambassador of Kenya; H.E. the Right Honorable Sudjadnan Pamchadningrat in his capacity as Ambassador of Indonesia, H.E. the Right Honorable Sir Nigel Steinwald in his capacity as ambassador of Great Britain, H.E. the Right Honorable Hussein Haqqani in his capacity as Ambassador of Pakistan and Mr. Sergei Kislyak, Ambassador of the Russian Federation.  All of these discovery actions will constitute mandates to persons over whom this Honorable Court may and in this extraordinary case ought to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction.

Respectfully Submitted on this 16^th day of June, 2009

By:____________________________________

Counsel for the Applicants

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

26302 La Paz, Mission Viejo CA 92691

Phone 949-683-5411 Fax 949-586-2082

PROOF OF SERVICE

Proof of Service Attached to Bill of Complaint including Notarized Affidavit of Service to all Parties Respondent according to Rules 29.3, 29.4, and 29.5 of this United States Supreme Court.  This Motion and Bill of Complaint are being served on all parties simultaneously.

By:____________________________________

Comments

Search for:

Official Facebook Page

Orly Taitz

Create Your Badge

Blogroll

• Conservative Monster
• Give Us Liberty Blog
• How to contact public Integrity unit
• IMPORTANT.. PLEASE READ!!!!!
• Judges Hall of Shame
• Paypal Donate

Advertisement / Sponsors

Vote Dr. Orly Taitz for CA Secretary of State

Click the picture below to visit the campaign website.



--------------------------------------
Make a donation to Dr. Orly Taitz for CA Secretary of State 2010 Campaign
--------------------------------------



--------------------------------------



--------------------------------------