OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

more on Keys at al v Obama et al

Posted on | June 13, 2009 | 3 Comments

 
Bob

Hungry,

I didn’t see the clerks comment, but he is right in saying 4E isn’t the same as 4I . The point is 4I DOES NOT apply in this case. 4I calls for :

(2)Agency; Corporation; Officer or Employee Sued in an Official Capacity.

(3) Officer or Employee Sued Individually

Now under (3):

To serve a United States officer or employee sued in an individual capacity for an act or omission occurring in connection with duties performed on the United States’ behalf

He is not being sued for an ACT in connection with DUTIES PERFORMED on the United States ‘behalf nor is he being sued in an official capacity as in (2)

He is being sued as an individual itself. Therefore, only Rule 4e applies.
From the lawsuit itself :

Alan Keyes, PhD., Wiley S. Drake, and Markham Robinson,

Plaintiffs

v.

Barack H. Obama, a/k/a Barack H. Obama, II a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro; Condoleeza Rice, in her capacity as Secretary of State; Robert Mueller, in his capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and Michael W. Hager, in his capacity as Acting Director, Office of Personnel Management; and DOES 1-100

Notice he is NOT being sued in his official capacity. The lawsuit is based on the executive order issued by President George w. Bush on the 01.16.09. The executive order provides for Reciprocity and Reinvestigation of Individuals in positions of public trust.

THEREFORE, the Clerk once again is FULL OF IT. This clerk should actually READ the lawsuit he is making judgements on.
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

3 Responses to “more on Keys at al v Obama et al”

  1. NewEnglandPatriot
    June 13th, 2009 @ 6:14 pm

    Is this a favorable ruling of some kind, or is the clerk trying to dismiss the case?

  2. sue
    June 13th, 2009 @ 9:27 pm

    Orly,

    Why don’t you post the judges orders placed on the docket 6-12-09?

  3. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    June 14th, 2009 @ 12:24 am

    Sue ,look at the 10 page motion I just posted+ I do have a family and a business. Believe me, I have a few more things to ado aside from posting on the blog.