Explanation of the rules
Posted on | June 13, 2009 | 13 Comments
 Bobg |
Submitted on 2009/06/12 at 11:38pm
Hungry, I didn’t see the clerks comment, but he is right in saying 4E isn’t the same as 4I . The point is 4I DOES NOT apply in this case. 4I calls for : (2)Agency; Corporation; Officer or Employee Sued in an Official Capacity. (3) Officer or Employee Sued Individually Now under (3): To serve a United States officer or employee sued in an individual capacity for an act or omission occurring in connection with duties performed on the United States’ behalf He is not being sued for an ACT in connection with DUTIES PERFORMED on the United States ‘behalf nor is he being sued in an official capacity as in (2) He is being sued as an individual itself. Therefore, only Rule 4e applies. Alan Keyes, PhD., Wiley S. Drake, and Markham Robinson, Plaintiffs v. Barack H. Obama, a/k/a Barack H. Obama, II a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro; Condoleeza Rice, in her capacity as Secretary of State; Robert Mueller, in his capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and Michael W. Hager, in his capacity as Acting Director, Office of Personnel Management; and DOES 1-100 Notice he is NOT being sued in his official capacity. The lawsuit is based on the executive order issued by President George w. Bush on the 01.16.09. The executive order provides for Reciprocity and Reinvestigation of Individuals in positions of public trust. THEREFORE, the Clerk once again is FULL OF IT. This clerk should actually READ the lawsuit he is making judgements on. |
Comment from Orly
This is exactly my point. I did not sue Obama in his scapacity as the president. I sued him as an individual for his acts prior to becoming the president. Judge Carter was obligated to give me a default. I will be filing a motion for reconsideration of the ruling on 06.12.09. If he does not reconsider and does not give me a default against Obama, I will appeal to the higher court.
Comments
13 Responses to “Explanation of the rules”
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
June 13th, 2009 @ 12:01 pm
“THEREFORE, the Clerk once again is FULL OF IT. This clerk should actually READ the lawsuit he is making judgements on.”
These were the Judges Orders.
“Judge Carter was obligated to give me a default. I will be filing a motion for reconsideration of the ruling on 06.12.09. If he does not reconsider and does not give me a default against Obama, I will appeal to the higher court.”
1. No, Judge Carter is NOT obligated to give you a default.
2. 6-12-09 has already passed; you must mean 6-15-09
3. Judge Carter WILL NOT GIVE YOU A DEFAULT AGAINST OBAMA.
4. BETTER START DRAFTING YOUR APPEAL TO THE HIGHER COURT TODAY AND FILE IT RIGHT AFTER JUDGE CARTER DENIES (6-16-09) YOUR MOTION FOR DEFAULT.
June 13th, 2009 @ 12:45 pm
Dr. Taitz (and Bob)
I have two concerns:
One) the other people mentioned Sec of State, etc Is this how the court avoids giving you a deault? Can the government/court clerk try and argue that even if the ursuper wasn’t president in 2008, the other people listed were part of the “government”?
Is that how they get around President Bush exucitive order? and
Two)do you think an appeals court will understand what this “rule 4” is, since Judge Carter obviously does not. Are there appeals courts we should be calling on your behalf?
June 13th, 2009 @ 1:18 pm
https://www.foxnews.com/huckabee/
To be part of our live, studio audience please call:
1-877-225-8587 or e-mail: hucktix@foxnews.com
(Be sure to include the number of seats you need and your contact information)
We need to get some persons(birthers) to attend to show and to ask Huckabee LIVE on the show about Obama’s eligibility.
The Goal should be to get as many birthers to attend the show as possible and ask Huckabee LIVE about Obama’s eligibility.
A Few Tips:
1. If some birthers do attend the show they need keep the Eligibility issue to themselves. It is absolutely imperative they don’t mention Obama’s Eligibility to anyone else (Screeners) EXCEPT to Huckabee LIVE on his show.
2. Birthers need to come up with a legitimate question for Huckabee if screeners are involved. Once Huckabee addresses the person (Birther), he or she addresses his or her Obama Eligibility Question LIVE on the show.
3. Birthers may also wish to address Obama’s Eligibility Question to any of Huckabee’s guests.
4. It would also help that when the birther addresses Huckabee or one of his guests LIVE about Obama’s Eligibility, other people should cheer and egg the person asking the question on to bolster support.
4. Please be aware that if some birthers do decide to do this, they may some backlash from the show. They could be removed from the premises. This is a risk that birthers must be willing to take if they want to get this issue LIVE on a Fox News Program.
The Whole Goal of this possible initiative is get Obama’s Eligibility addressed by authortative figure LIVE on Fox News.
June 13th, 2009 @ 2:24 pm
why wouldn’t he give me a default? He has no legal justification to deny
June 13th, 2009 @ 2:51 pm
He won’t give you a default because he part of the problem. He, like possibly every judge out there, defies and defiles the Constitution on a daily basis and are among America’s worst criminals. My brother is a retired judge from a time when there were actually some that upheld the Constitution and followed the rule of law. He is appalled at the judicial malfeasance being practiced across the board and refers to judges as devils in robes.
Carter is operating outside the law as the rule for default is clear and his actions are clearly criminal and a violation of judicial ethics. Might want to find out who bought him off. This evil, in the mad march to collectivism, is systemic and completely out of control.
The laws were meant to apply equally to all and judges are commanded by their oath to not falter in the application of such. Failure to carry out the rule of law or deny due process is illegal and cause for immediate removal and/or impeachment. Judicial tyranny as well as governmental tyranny will not be tolerated by the people and those who pursue such, must be dealt the most severe penalties under the law.
June 13th, 2009 @ 3:56 pm
I got it mixed up with 13489 (BHO’s 1st), I remembered that it had to do with hiding documents:
Obama Exec Order 13489 Hiding Presidential Papers
https://www.docstoc.com/docs/6774290/Obama-Exec-Order-13489
Hiding Presidential Papers
” the disclosure of which he believes may raise a substantial question of executive privilege. “
June 13th, 2009 @ 4:26 pm
What time was the case recorded as rec’d? If is was recorded after 12 noon on January 20th then Obama was already president.
June 13th, 2009 @ 5:39 pm
“What time was the case recorded as rec’d? If is was recorded after 12 noon on January 20th then Obama was already president.”
But Sarah, remember, the oath was flubbed, and they had to redo it later in the evening, so the time of Orly’s filing is fine.
June 13th, 2009 @ 5:52 pm
I am so angry about all that is going on. How can this man be President with all that is not proven that he could even run for President. Treason is such a grave matter how can it be proven? I have heard that he is trying to change the oath that is taken by the military so as to remove the part of it that says they will uphold and defend the Constitution, it seems like he is doing all he can to get rid of our Constitution. Has not the fact that no one read the stimulus before it was signed in it self unconstitutional? Please do not ever give up Dr. Taitz, we must find out the truth as soon as possible before our Country is lost. God Speed and God bless, and may God Bless America. Thank you for listening.
June 13th, 2009 @ 6:19 pm
It sounds as if the judge didn’t grant the default when he should have. Can he be sued for not following the law? How about some citizens in the judge’s county conducting an investigation and forming their own grand jury? If there is evidence that the judge broke the law, he could be arrested.
June 13th, 2009 @ 9:01 pm
Most people can’t fathom the magnitude of this fraud. They react in disbelief when you tell them the truth about Obama, and the huge fraud he has perpetrated on the Americans . Can anyone say Jihad?
June 13th, 2009 @ 11:04 pm
“These were the Judges Orders.’
Well, then the Judge is Full of It
June 13th, 2009 @ 11:16 pm
Al,
“He won’t give you a default because he part of the problem. He, like possibly every judge out there, defies and defiles the Constitution on a daily basis and are among America’s worst criminals.”
Plus he is another Clinton appointee.