The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
|
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation,
c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.
When the people fear their government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty. -- Thomas Jefferson
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act. -- George Orwell
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you,
then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi
|

|
June 12th, 2009 @ 10:13 pm
Judicial Watch has just published an article stating that a Mr. Walpin, an inspector general who exposed fraud on the part of one of Obama’s supporters, has been fired. This goes against a statute which prohibits an IG or any other whistleblower from being persecuted and/or retaliated against for political reasons.
There is a law on the books which Obama cosponsored when he was a senator stating that very thing. Now the thug has fired somone unjustly because he found fraud committed by an Obama crony.
This man is the perfect plaintiff to file Quo Warranto against Obama demanding that he prove that he holds his position constitutionally. That is how a QW case came about in the 1980s. The boss who fired the federal employees had to answer the filing and it was found that he was not eligible to hold his position. He was then removed from office.
June 13th, 2009 @ 4:26 am
If anyone does attend the Huckabee program, here is some information that can be used as evidence (taken from another blog site “the Obama File”
Sen. Leahy Says Obama Not Eligible
On April 10, 2008, Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Claire McCaskill (D-MO) introduced a resolution expressing the sense of the U.S. Senate that presidential candidate Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) was a ‘natural born Citizen,’ as specified in the Constitution and eligible to run for President.
“Because he was born to American citizens, there is no doubt in my mind that Senator McCain is a natural born citizen,” said Leahy. “I expect that this will be a unanimous resolution of the Senate.”
At a Judiciary Committee hearing on April 3, Leahy asked Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, himself a former Federal judge, if he had doubts that McCain was eligible to serve as President.
“My assumption and my understanding is that if you are born of American parents, you are naturally a natural-born American citizen,” Chertoff replied.
“That is mine, too,” said Leahy.
What’s interesting here is that Sen. Leahy, the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary, confirms that a “natural born” citizen is the child of American citizen parents.
Parents — that’s two. That’s BOTH parents.
Every time the words, “citizen” and “parent,” are used by Sen. Leahy and Sec. Chertoff, the plural case, “citizens” and “parents,” is used. The plural case is the operative case.
It is Sen. Leahy’s opinion — his own recorded words, in a formal Senate Resolution and on his U. S. Senate website — that Barack Obama is not a “natural born” citizen, and therefore not eligible to serve as Commander-in-Chief, regardless of his birthplace.
Obama had one American parent –singular — his mother. His father was a citizen of Kenya, and a subject of Great Britain.
Obama, himself, “at birth,” was a citizen of Kenya, and a subject of Great Britain — he says so on his own campaign website. This fact introduces the concept of “divided loyalties,” — the reason the founders created the eligibility requirement in the first place — a fact that further underlines Obama’s ineligibility.
The source of this information is Sen. Leahy’s own website. The webpage contains a statement about the resolution; the resolution, itself; the Statement Of Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.); and an excerpt of Sec. Chertoff’s testimony.
The plural word “parents” is used four times. When used to identify the parents, the word “citizens” is used five times. That’s nine times that Sen. Leahy, on his own website describes the eligibility requirement. There is NO PLACE in any of these four documents where the singular case of “parent” or “citizen” is used.
Obama is a co-signer of this resolution. So, I guess he too agrees that one needs two American parents to be eligible for POTUS — except he doesn’t care — after all, he’s the Obamamessiah. Rules don’t apply to him. Same kind of thing he has/is doing with Inspector Generals (Americorps).
June 13th, 2009 @ 10:21 am
Obama Bill Boards Slowly Spreading!
https://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=100914
Grassroots sign onto eligibility billboard campaign
Washington state ‘Where’s The Birth Certificate’ sign appears
Come my friends, let’s get more Bill Boards out there.
June 13th, 2009 @ 10:26 am
Yes, we could really start a good media spin on the issue. A bunch of birthers should sign up to attend the show. If Huckabee addresses one, they bring up the eligiblity issue.
2 Things to Note:
1. If some birthers do attend the show they need keep the Eligibility issue to themselves. They don’t mention this to anyone else except to Huckabee LIVE on his show.
2. Please be aware that if some birthers do decide to do this, they may some backlash from the show. They could be removed from the premises. This is a risk that birthers must be willing to take if want to get this issue LIVE on a Fox News Program.
June 13th, 2009 @ 10:28 am
Again, for birthers who decide to do this. There may some backlash from the Huckabee Show. You must be willing to accept and take the risk if you want to this issue LIVE on a Fox News Program.
June 13th, 2009 @ 1:53 pm
Most “live” broadcasts still employ a delay in order to screen out profanities and other FCC objectionable content.
The one exception is sometimes a sporting event will be broadcast live because of the timed nature of the event and simultaneous coverage from other networks.
When Janet Jackson had a “wardrobe malfunction”, very few channels received the video in question.
The exceptions were the local channels who broadcast live.
So don’t expect to surprise Huckabee with a birther question.
The networks may surprise you with a block of “dead air.”
June 15th, 2009 @ 2:50 am
They may not give a lot of time to ask questions. So, one simple short one gets to the point.
“The White House says the President released his birth certificate online for all to see – to settle the question of his eligibility. Leaving aside the fact that what he released was a short form summary – (whose authenticity has been questioned ) and not the long form which gives corroborating info such as the hospital he was born in, why doesn’t the President sign a waiver with the Department of Health in Hawaii to release his BC to anyone that requests it. Instead he continues to fight the release of that document. WHY ? According to the White House they already released it to the public via the Internet. Why continue to fight the release of something that they themselves have said they already released ? Is it because the one the released is not authentic ?
June 17th, 2009 @ 12:24 am
Karen, James….SteveinTX and I have formed a Yahoo group. We are going to create assignments and strategies to spread the word overseas and throughout the country. Remember the Jerusalem Post thread (check it out and see what was being discussed) from over a week a ago? It got buried and dried up and we lost momentum. Please contact Steve at his email :
scyrier@netzero.net
We are just getting this up and running. Contact Steve and get on the ground floor. Please help. We can do this. We just need to be organized! Steve will tell you how to get into the group. By this weekend we want enthusiastic patriots who are willing to do a bit each day! Thank you. – Gary