CHRISTIPEDIA: INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY, GROWING …

21 Responses to “What media is not telling you?”

1. Leslie Johnson
   July 29th, 2012 @ 9:51 pm

   I’m confused what Christipedia has to do with anything that this Web-Site is trying to accomplish.

   Are they on our side, in the middle, or on Whats His name’s side.

   After looking at what they have posted here I just don’t know.

   Please everybody stay focus on what we are all trying to achieve.

   I certainly hope Christipedia is on our side, but if they aren’t so be it.

   America, please WAKE UP, and for us, the ones that are already WIDE AWAKE, let’s all stay FOCUS on what our Great leader Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. is doing and help her any and every way we can.

2. Authenticator
   July 30th, 2012 @ 7:02 pm

   John Robb-
   Hijack? nice word for a christian judgment within Christianity. Christ called for adherence to the Commandments given on Mt. Sinai. He even made a summation that to keep them was exercising a love of humanity. If those commandments alone were stuck to, this blog would maybe not be in existence as its issues of concern would have been resolved through the U.S. justice system.

   All the little and big legalisms of any denomination are a distraction, no doubt, and they always will be. A quick look at any ‘Yellow Pages’ shows as many listings of churches as of attorneys, each with a variation of someone else’s idea of reality and deity.

   Apparently the U.S. Supreme Court is stacked with Catholics. Accuse them of occultism and ask them why they do not perform their elected duties in the context of eligibility. It’s a sure bet that Mary, the Pope, etc., will be nowhere-to-be-found in their answers, should any that are reasonable, be provided. It is.. a fair statement to say the Catholic church’s moral inconstancies overall are amuck. Like any institution they unfortunately reflect the society they house. Maybe your academic and time tested excellence-should you possess these-can right them and your forces can be intersected for a greater good.

3. Veritas
   July 30th, 2012 @ 7:26 pm

   The MEDIA should have reported THIS ages ago, but, thank GOD for Drudge, he has it as a headline today:
   ————–

   Court Finds Obama Appointees Interfered with New Black Panther Prosecution…

   (is anyone surprised?)

4. The Phoenix
   July 30th, 2012 @ 9:18 pm

   The Catholic Church is a false religion of sorts, in that, the “created position” of Pope absconded (usurped!) with the position of being the “intermediary between God and man!” That was not given to the Pope! But was granted to Jesus! Since Jesus was the one that died on the Cross at Calvary! We have then, the time frame of: (a BC-Before Christ or an AD-After Christ Died.) Though, editing has taken place a couple of times later, as well.

5. HE TOLD YOU
   August 1st, 2012 @ 5:42 am

   THE USURPER TOLD YOU WHAT HE WANTED TO DO TO AMERICA. THAT WHITE HOUSE NG PIECE OF DUNG NEEDS TO BE REMOVES. READ WHAT HE SAID BELOW
   *******************8
   Yes, he told us in advance what he planned to do. Few were listening.
   �
   The following is a narrative taken from a 2008 Sunday morning televised “Meet The Press’.

   From Sunday’s 07 Sept. 2008 11:48:04 EST, Televised “Meet the Press” the THEN Senator Obama was asked about his stance on the American Flag.

   General Bill Gann’ USAF (ret.) asked Obama to explain WHY he doesn’t follow protocol when the National Anthem is played.

   The General stated to Obama that according to the United States Code, Title 36, Chapter 10, Sec. 171…

   During rendition of the national anthem, when the flag is displayed, all present (except those in uniform) are expected to stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart. Or, at the very least, “Stand and Face It”.

   NOW GET THIS !!
   ‘Senator Obama replied:

   “As I’ve said about the flag pin, I don’t want to be perceived as taking sides”. “There are a lot of people in the world to whom the American flag is a symbol of oppression..” “The anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air and all that sort of thing.”
   (ARE YOU READY FOR THIS???)

   Obama continued: “The National Anthem should be ‘swapped’ for something less parochial and less bellicose. I like the song ‘I’d Like To Teach the World To Sing’. If that were our anthem, then, I might salute it. In my opinion, we should consider reinventing our National Anthem as well as ‘redesign’ our Flag to better offer our enemies hope and love.It’s my intention, if elected, to disarm America to the level of acceptance to our Middle East Brethren. If we, as a Nation of warring people, conduct ourselves like the nations of Islam, where peace prevails – – – perhaps a state or period of mutual accord could exist between our governments ……”
   When I become President, I will seek a pact of agreement to end hostilities between those who have been at war or in a state of enmity, and a freedom from disquieting oppressive thoughts. We as a Nation, have placed upon the nations of Islam, an unfair injustice which is WHY my wife disrespects the Flag and she and I have attended several flag burning ceremonies in the past”.

   “Of course now, I have found myself about to become the President of the United States and I have put my hatred aside. I will use my power to bring CHANGE to this Nation, and offer the people a new path. My wife and I look forward to becoming our Country’s First black Family. Indeed, CHANGE is about to overwhelm the United States of America “

6. leslie Johnson
   August 1st, 2012 @ 5:00 pm

   If Whats his Name really said on “MEET THE PRESS” on a Sunday morning broadcast just after he won the election for President in 2008, what I just read above, why didn’t every American Citizen that loves our Country, that heard him say it, DEMAND an IMMEDIATE RECALL?

   What I just read above should be broadcast FAR and Wide.

   What, Whats His Name said if it’s not unconstitutional it certainly is anti American.

   The reason Whats His Name was able to get away with saying it is because of the First Amendment to our Sacred Sonstitution. “Freedom of Speech”

   If I’m not mistaken hasn’t Whats Name been trying to curtail our Freedom of Speech, which he used when making all those Anti American remarks on Meet the Press in 2008.

   Please WAKE UP AMERICA, before it’s TO LATE

7. Phoenix'Daddy
   August 1st, 2012 @ 7:51 pm

   Hey Phoenix, the Catholic church is a false religion just like your mama’s a whore!

8. Authenticator
   August 2nd, 2012 @ 4:07 am

   “Doesn’t make a rendition of biblical character and idol worship.”

   Correction: (A statue) doesn’t make a rendition of biblical character (an) idol worship.

9. Henry Tisdale
   August 2nd, 2012 @ 10:14 am

   Damn it, Google just erased a long comment whose content was mostly a question for you Orly. About 2 months ago or so, I wrote the Georgia Deputy Chief Judge, Michael Malihi and asked this question of him. Since you have denied the Defendant’s motion to dismiss, is the case still open? If so, would it be appropriate, and legal to request the court to demand that the Defendant (President Obama) fulfill his obligations to bring your subpoenaed items before the court. If this answer is yes, shall the Plaintiff, Dr. Orly Taitz esq. file another claim? Her objectives are two.

   If President Obama is innocent, then he has an excellent chance to prove it, plus he would be following court orders.

   If Dr. Taitz’ claim meets all requirements, is there any court orders to prevent her from seeing the subpoenaed items and hence prove his guilt.

   Please let me know your answers I am one of her followers and believe me, the corruption that is running wild in the federal judiciary, has caused her more undo pain and wrongful, judgements, and as an American citizen with high honors, she deserves to hear a clear, clean judgement of her claims.

   Thank you.

   Orly, is this all hogwash? Or, did you see a man in black who appeared to have some honesty about him. I am thinking that this may be the best way to get those damned birth papers.

10. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    August 2nd, 2012 @ 12:32 pm

    we will resubmit Farrar for the general election

11. Washed Hog
    August 2nd, 2012 @ 9:07 pm

    It’s all hogwash, Henry – eveything about bitherism is hogwash. Hogwash, I say! Hogwash!

12. Washed Hog
    August 2nd, 2012 @ 9:07 pm

    It’s all hogwash, Henry – eveything about birtherism is hogwash. Hogwash, I say! Hogwash!

13. The Phoenix
    August 2nd, 2012 @ 11:04 pm

    Hoosier mommy: LOL! Am I glad that I’m not Catholic! Having to go and kiss some priests ring and “rear-end”…! Do you like having the church in control of your silly life?
    How freakin dense!

    Thank God for the Protestant Reformation! They are the ones that opened the eyes of the midaevil world! Oh, and my mother would ignore trash like you, but I won’t, as she was also a Christian! At least my mother was human!!! 🙂 LOL!

14. The Phoenix
    August 2nd, 2012 @ 11:17 pm

    Authenticator: such a long post! Your post is so long, and you jump around quite a bit. What are we to conclude with your post? I don’t know enough about Robb and Elizabeth to concern myself with whether they are idolators?! They posted civily, as far as I know!

    Robb and Elizabeth have the right to their opinion! If you don’t like it, you and “dork-daddy” need to stop taking post liberties with attacking posters that are defending America and Orly, through her site! Anyone who is Catholic and can’t handle this, just move on!

15. Authenticator
    August 3rd, 2012 @ 5:45 am

    Phoenix, for a Vietnam vet you sure could improve your strategy of alliances in defending the country. It was you who added 2¢ of Catholic bashing when you could’ve left it alone. Fyi, no clergy controls anything I do, I’ve never kissed ‘their’ ring (you make a good point, I don’t get that either), and regrettably I’m not a church attendee on any kind of a regular basis for the points I listed; have “hopped” to a dozen of Protestant churches over the years, was a member of one. I took it upon myself, however, to level the field in Robber’s foray. Nevertheless, I admire your unabashed ignorance and passion. I don’t plan on moving so might work toward some amiability. Thanks for the Vietnam service.

16. Authenticator
    August 3rd, 2012 @ 6:01 am

    Phoenix, I contradicted myself. A Clergy’s biblical leadership, if expressed, controls me. On the other hand, Clergy’s personal whims–what you implied–do not control me.
    Another point: in Continental Europe, men kiss other men on the cheek and that would freak us out here. So kissing the Pope’s ring may be a subtle variation of normal custom.

17. The Phoenix
    August 3rd, 2012 @ 8:20 am

    Authenticator: I’m not a viet nam vet! Where did you get that idea? And you have missed the point. Jesus (WAS-IS) the intermediary between God and man! Not the freakin’ Pope!
    Did the Pope (any of them) die on the Cross? Nein! Non-disch-ka! But many of them have been very devious for the past 1600 hundred years! Robb is right! If the cream doesn’t rise to the top from the beginning, then, it never will!

18. Henry Tisdale
    August 5th, 2012 @ 7:38 pm

    Hey guys, this is no place and no time to argue religion. There are many sites available for going just that. Why not go there and make whatever points you like.

Leave a Reply