OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Can Taylor be held liable?

Posted on | May 31, 2009 | 3 Comments

  bill
l

Not being a legal eagle it does appear to me that Mr.Taylors departure was all he could do.If he had carried out Orlys Quo Warranto he would be put in a precarious and scary position.If he didn’t file and stayed could he be looked upon as commiting a Misprision of Felony ? Seems Washington works by getting people to resign and suddenly the heat goes away.The only problem I might imagine is that regardless whether or not Mr.Taylor resigned,could he be held on Misprision of Felony because Quo Warranto was filed on his watch and he did nothing.? I wonder if a grand jury would let it slide after the truth is found out ?
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

3 Responses to “Can Taylor be held liable?”

  1. Nick
    June 1st, 2009 @ 1:38 am

    No, Taylor cannot be prosecuted for this. Leo Donofrio answered someone on that issue on his website in a reply to a comment that was posted on April 8th: see https://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/two-us-postal-receipts-for-letters-to-us-attorney-taylor/#comment-6419

    Leo’s response: “there’s no case to bring against taylor. the statute gives him complete discretion.”

    We need to focus on the main objective: exposing the fraud of Obama himself.

  2. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    June 1st, 2009 @ 1:52 am

    I respectfully disagree with Leo. Taylor had a discretion whether to bring charges or not, however he did not have a discretion to sit on his hands and do nothing. Imagine a chief of police arbitrarily deciding not to do his job and not to incarcerate criminals and one of those criminals kills a person. the family would have a valid legal action against the police department. Do you remember LA riots? People were hurt and some filed legal actions against police for not protecting them. Taylor and the rest of our impotent law enforcement and judiciary and government did not protect us from usurpation. we have a valid claim against a lot of people. At the very minimum they were negligent, most probably they were reckless, conceivably some of them were actively involved in commission of misprision of felony and aiding and abetting all the crimes that were committed. Question is, who will prosecute them? If the government is not doing it’s job, then it is up to the citizen’s militia.

  3. Sherry Piles
    June 1st, 2009 @ 2:33 am

    Wait Im lost when did taylor leave and why