18 Responses to “According to “Times of India” 2 Justices of the Supreme Court voted to grant my petition. Does anyone know, who were these 2 Justices? Maybe in the next case I will have 4, which is necessary for the oral argument. Having 2 Justices on my side is a progress”

1. turnright
   January 11th, 2011 @ 11:00 pm

   I don’t know who the Supremes are, but a solution… actually a smoking out… to this mess might be to have a wealthy Republican very publicly offer one million dollars to the Democrat National Committee for an autographed, certified copy of OZero’s actual long form birth certificate, the BC to be the only one in existence besides what the un-prez may have.

   The investor could auction it off if desired, or keep it as a collectible along with the Honus Wagners in the wall safe.

2. Relayed
   January 12th, 2011 @ 1:57 am

   Orly, if you take the “7-2” as true, do you also accept the “NBC = born in the US” as true which the same article states?

3. Phil
   January 12th, 2011 @ 2:57 am

   Turnright:…Very interesting! That could become an “option?”

   Orly, yes! 2 of them who supported your case…very good! Keep “whittling” away! Plan on 2 of them NOT to care! So that leaves just 2 more or so? So PLEASE…all Patriots offer any suggestions to become options???

   But…it might be judicious to “write Orly an email,” instead of posting “any” solutions here…cause the C.E.T.s are lurking and reading everything! We shouldn’t “tip our hand” to them! They could try to “block” our options, if they’re posted!

   Patriots…”think like a ‘007’!” Think like a “security officer!” Think like a “secret service agent!” In the right frame of mind, our efforts can keep them “off-guard!” Let’s all do some serious “brain-storming?”

   They like to be covert…let’s “teach them how to play”! We know whom “they” are…but they don’t know whom we ARE! This is why I didn’t post a pix on any of those personal groups, like Facebook, etc.!

   They won’t know what we have planned, at any given time! If we don’t “telegraph” our intentions! This is crucial…!

   Remember how Orly made “trips” without broadcasting anything ahead of time? That’s what we need to do! Or how Reagan invaded Grenada, with “no advance discussion?”

   Don’t give out “game films” to help the enemy! This is very serious! We have to think in “terms of survival!” And to come to the realization that “THEY DO MEAN US GRAVE HARM!”

   Our future is in the balance! So please, post “around” your main subject, without giving any inkling away, as to what “option” you want to be tried! People like john are nothing more than “Harpies!” They want to do us “harm!”

   [If]…Orly will allow options to be sent to her, if they don’t get too excessive and long? And that was very “creative” by T.R.!

   I have some creative ideas, myself. But the “tails side of this coin,” shouldn’t know “too much”…!

   Besides, we can have some “fun,” with john and all his “nefarious, nattering nabobs of negative-neandrathal ‘netti-pots’!” LOL!

   Davey Crockett…

4. Paul Jackson
   January 12th, 2011 @ 3:23 am

   That’s a bogus article. No one knows what any vote was or indeed whether the petition even made the discussion list, which is doubtful. Not to mention the fact that Obama’s eligibility was not before the Supreme Court.

5. John
   January 12th, 2011 @ 3:46 am

   I don’t think that any of the justices is stupid or crazy enough to vote for cert in this case. The Times of India often contains spurious or mis-cited information about US politics.
   Good for you for remaining optimistic, Orly, but I don’t think the “next case” will have any outcome different than this one.

6. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
   January 12th, 2011 @ 6:47 am

   we shall see

7. Chito
   January 12th, 2011 @ 7:22 am

   It makes us wonder how the Times of India could know more than the mainsteam media.

   Davey Crockett is right about not telegraphing plans. But sometimes Orly needs to hear some public support. And specially financial support too.

   It is noteworthy to remember that Abe Lincoln has had many failures. But he never gave up. Eventually he succeeded. One day Orly will succeed too.

8. turnright
   January 12th, 2011 @ 7:23 am

   Something that presents an interesting possibility is the simple act on our part of emailing Orly’s website address to all the judges and court administrators in our individual states. Let them look for themselves at the actual situation. Most of them, I believe, just don’t know.

   Don’t say too much in your RESPECTFUL!! email, the more we say, the less someone feels a reason to open up the site.

   Be kind, that in itself opens doors.

   There could be a ready cadre over at “wethepeopleusa.ning.com” to do this with. They are organized according to state.

9. Col. Angus
   January 12th, 2011 @ 8:23 am

   we’ve BEEN seeing. Day and nite, Night and Day, the birthers have been corrected by American jurists. 7-2? Entirely spurious.

10. Max Zorin
    January 12th, 2011 @ 9:27 am

    Who are the two? How does the Times of India know?

11. karen
    January 12th, 2011 @ 9:48 am

    Dr Orly I called their number 91 11 2330 2000 and a very rude man asked me if I new what time it was. Of course I do!!! It was 11:15. But he just kept asking. Maybe someone else can call and do’nt get that very rude man.

    I bet it is the 2 judges you met, Scallia and Roberts. You always make such an impression.

12. tara
    January 12th, 2011 @ 9:50 am

    Dr Orly I called their number 91 11 2330 2000 and a very rude man asked me if I new what time it was. Of course I do!!! It was 11:15. But he just kept asking. Maybe someone else can call and dont get that very rude man.

    I bet it is the 2 judges you met, Scalia and Roberts. You always make such an impression

13. Elliot
    January 12th, 2011 @ 10:29 am

    There were no recorded dissents from the denial of cert., but Scalia and Thomas did dissent from other denials of cert. that same day. So how does the Times of India know that there were two votes for cert.?

14. turnright
    January 12th, 2011 @ 11:10 am

    Colonel,

    You’re upside-down in this. Demonstrate for us where it is that any judge has actually looked at any of the mountain of evidence provided to them all. If a judge… in reality a cowardly rubber stamp… has MADE A RULING BASED on his having examined the evidence, let us know.

15. MRR
    January 12th, 2011 @ 3:44 pm

    I am wondering how the decision could have been 7 to 2, when I have read that Sotomeyor and Kagan recused themselves this time.

16. Mark Galperin
    January 12th, 2011 @ 4:37 pm

    https://www.miamiherald.com/2011/01/10/2009166/appeal-by-birther-attorney-taitz.html

    “I will be filing a proper complaint with the Committee of the Judiciary with the U.S. House.”

    – with new House it could have some effect…

    Go ahead, Orly.

17. Marty
    January 12th, 2011 @ 10:44 pm

    There is absolutely no way to know if there was 1, 2 or 3 Justices that agreed. No one in the Court is going to tell, and that was in a totally confidential meeting. With 30 plus years around courts, I can assure all readers that anyone alleging 2 Justices agreed to hear Orly’s case gave a bogus report. It is a waste of time to speculate, and the report should be given no weight. No one except the Justices in the Court can confirm how each voted, so why waste time on this issue? Justice Thomas flat made it clear that the Court is not going to hear this issue. That is a matter of public record. Every possible effort to get as many states to pass laws demanding clear, well doumented proof a candidate for President in 2012 meets all the requirements to be a NBC is crucial. Also, we must have several totally reliable members of Congress with the absolute guts to stand up and demand proof, if BHO reaches potential confirmation in 2 years, or we have anything close to this ever again.

18. John
    January 13th, 2011 @ 4:15 pm

    Marty, with “30 plus years around courts,”, you should know that the Constitutional requirement that a candidate be a “natural born citizen” means one and only one thing – that a person is born on US soil. President Obama has clearly met this requirement.

Leave a Reply