Important
Posted on | May 29, 2009 | 10 Comments
| (ANx), DISCOVERY, MANADR |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Southern Division – Santa Ana)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN
|
Keyes et al v. Obama et al Assigned to: Judge David O. Carter Referred to: Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question |
Date Filed: 01/20/2009 Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other Jurisdiction: Federal Question |
| Plaintiff | ||
| Alan Keyes PhD | represented by | Orly Taitz Orly Taitz Law Offices 26302 La Paz, Ste 211 Mission Viejo , CA 92691 949-683-5411 Email: dr_taitz@yahoo.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED |
| Plaintiff | ||
| Wiley S Drake | represented by | Orly Taitz (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED |
| Plaintiff | ||
| Markham Robinson | represented by | Orly Taitz (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED |
| V. | ||
| Defendant | ||
| Barack H Obama also known as Barack Hussein Obama, II also known as Barack H Obama, II also known as Barry Obama also known as Barry Soetoro |
||
| Defendant | ||
| Condoleeza Rice in her capacity as Secretary of State |
||
| Defendant | ||
| Robert Mueller in his capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation |
||
| Defendant | ||
| Michael W Hager in his capacity as Acting Director, Office of Personnel Management |
||
| 05/27/2009 | 7 | First REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Barack H Obama filed by filer-plaitiff Alan Keyes PhD. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Affidavit of process server)(Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 05/27/2009) |
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
10 Responses to “Important”
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
May 29th, 2009 @ 4:13 pm
Orly, I am not sure the Judge will be happy about you filing a request for default entry as your response to the Judge’s Order to show cause??
BE CAREFUL HERE!!!
You need to establish for the Judge that you DID accomplish proper service as according to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, specifically Rule 4. Read it here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule4.htm
The judge seems to be saying you did not serve process correctly, and so there was NO service accomplished, you need to show that you did, and the story in that affadavit doesn’t seem to be enough to accomplish service if you read Rule 4 carefully!
Maybe you should file a response to the Judge’s Order to Show Cause so the Judge does not get mad and maybe impose Rule 11 sanctions!! Those Federal judges seem to be really sticky about following all those Federal Rules REALLY carefully, and if you even miss one part of a Rule they get really mad and throw away your case!
May 29th, 2009 @ 4:31 pm
Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, Rule 4, includes the proper method of service on officers of the United States, by the way.
May 29th, 2009 @ 4:41 pm
Orly, you can read all the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure here online: https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/index.html#chapter_ii
Also, please keep in mind that each different Federal Court (each District Court) also has a set of Local Rules that you must follow, those can be found on the respective court’s websites under the Local Rules link.
Individual Judges also often have specific procedures that you MUST follow if you have a case before them, those are also at the specific court’s website.
There are a LOT of Rules governing procedure and lots of people win or lose cases when they do not know all of them or they don’t follow them perfectly. Please be sure to familiarize yourself with all the Rules, it makes things so much easier that way.
May 29th, 2009 @ 7:47 pm
Answering a civil complaint 3 days are allowed for delivery from the postmarked date.Sorry Phil.Nice try.
May 29th, 2009 @ 7:48 pm
3 Buisness days that is.
May 29th, 2009 @ 8:07 pm
what do you mean by 3 business days?
May 29th, 2009 @ 8:08 pm
who is Phil? what is it about?
May 30th, 2009 @ 12:53 am
what exactly did you see in rule 4?
May 30th, 2009 @ 2:00 am
But guess who,
The judge in PA requires electronic filing. And the deadline was not a post-mark by date, it was a must be at the courthouse and filed date.
It was FedEx’s fault. I just want to make sure that we don’t confuse people about post-mark dates and due in court dates.
Dr. Taitz, are you thinking about taking action against FedEx? Sounds like they messed up big!!!
May 30th, 2009 @ 2:35 am
Nice to see your still at it. Thow Obama and his team fall to show up in court might not keep the judge from dismissing the cast if they did what happen in Connerat v. Obama: Where the judge dismissed the suit even thow Obama and his legal team did not show up at the court.
It was reported in the news that Obama was out with Biden ordering Hamburgers at Ray’s Hell Burger in Virginia on the same day that it was reported that Connerat v. Obama was dismissed.
https://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=5936
news report about U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Taylor
The federal prosecutor who became the public face of the Justice Department’s investigation into the 2001 anthrax attacks, the killing of Chandra Levy and the Blackwater Worldwide shooting is resigning.
Washington U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Taylor, a holdover from the Bush administration, will leave the Justice Department on Friday. He will join the auditing firm Ernst & Young, where he will lead their fraud investigation practice.
Taylor inherited the anthrax and Chandra Levy investigations and declared both long-unsolved matters closed.
The Justice Department declared that Army scientist Bruce Ivins was responsible for the anthrax mailings that killed five people in 2001. Ivins killed himself before he could be indicted.
Taylor, 44, recently announced murder charges against 27-year-old Ingmar Guandique in the Levy case.
Taylor also announced manslaughter charges against Blackwater security contractors involved in the deadly 2007 shooting of Iraqi civilians. The case involved the unprecedented question of whether overseas State Department contractors could be charged in the U.S.
Taylor previously served as counselor to Attorney Generals John Ashcroft and Alberto Gonzales. He has also served as counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee and as a line prosecutor in San Diego.
Taylor took the top job in Washington on an interim basis in 2006 and, though the Senate never acted on his nomination, federal judges in Washington unanimously voted to extend his tenure.
President Barack Obama will nominate Taylor’s replacement. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, Washington’s nonvoting representative to the House, is conducting a public search for someone to recommend to the president.
https://www.startribune.com/nation/46368977.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/28/AR2009052801826.html