10 Responses to “Alan Keyes Comments on LTC Lakin’s Trial and ObamaGate”

1. Michael
   December 20th, 2010 @ 7:55 pm

   Lets organize a Citizens “Directive” instead of another meaningless “Petition” where we the undersigned Citizens, hereby direct our public servants to take action.

   Order them to Validate the natural born status of President and Commander and Chief, or be removed themselves for willful neglect of official duty. Failure to honor their oath of office.

   The more citizens we get to sign such a Citizen Declaration & Directive, the more pressure we can bring to bare.

   How about it, any support for this idea?

   Maybe, we could start a website just for this purpose. With a forum section where people can share ideas on how to apply even more and more pressure on those neglectful officials.

2. Phil
   December 20th, 2010 @ 11:50 pm

   Michael:…sounds interesting! But how would it become “legally” enforceable? And…here’s a major problem that “may be” looming on the horizen:…

   https://www.wnd.com/?pageId=241773

   Dr Corsi wrote this article for WND!

   Davey Crockett…

3. Tina F. Bronkowski
   December 21st, 2010 @ 12:54 pm

   Orly,

   Can you clear something up? Why didn’t Alan Keyes show up and testify on Lakin’s behalf? The pretrial court orders specifically allowed him, Gen. Vallely and other other guy to come and testify, if not on eligibility, then to Lakin’s character. Where was Alan Keyes? He certainly could have testified as to Lt. Col. Lakin’s fine character and shown the jury that we are not racists, to boot. Where was Vallely? Where were they when they could have helped?

4. CPT Pamela Barnett
   December 21st, 2010 @ 3:40 pm

   It would have been powerful if Ambassador Alan Keyes could have made it to the trial.

5. Veritas
   December 21st, 2010 @ 7:30 pm

   Today a PURPLE HEART RECIPIENT, WORLD WAR II vet, called to voice support for LTC LAKIN!
   Obama has a HANDFUL to deal with when the Greatest Generation lines up to clarify the situation!

6. Michael
   December 22nd, 2010 @ 10:29 am

   Phil,

   I understand your concern about what “may be”… “looming on the horizen:…” ….BUT we are not there yet and we must act quickly before it is too late.

   Lets not worry about what maybe, but lets act on what is. Together, we the People can correct these problems for our children and grand-children.

   “…But how would it become “legally” enforceable?…”

   The U.S. Constitution is the “Supreme Law of the Land.” I think it is legally enforceable by those who are sworn to support and defend it.

   The problem is, they are not doing so, and are breaking the “LAW.” They need to be corrected and widely exposed, or removed and jailed for their crimes against the “Sovereign People of these United States.”

7. Starla
   December 22nd, 2010 @ 4:46 pm

   GOD IS ASKING that We The American People, and ALL People on earth allow LORD JESUS CHRIST to Lead Us In HIS ALMIGHTY & FOREVER LIVING POWER & HOLINESS & LOVE & TRUTH & WISDOM & RIGHTEOUSNESS & GRACES on earth through the enormous darkness of evils, corruption, lies, deceptions, & sins of many kinds that are being committed on earth against GOD, humanity, & animals on earth.

   AMERICANS, & ALL PEOPLE ON EARTH: PLEASE LET THE FOREVER LIVING CREATOR – ALMIGHTY GOD, THE MOST HOLY TRINITY, & THE LORD JESUS CHRIST, Y’SHUA – GOD THE SON, WHO IS THE ALWAYS FAITHFUL & ALWAYS TRUE SAVIOR OF HUMANITY – LEAD US ON EARTH 24/7/365 IN THE FOREVER LIVING HOLY SPIRIT OF GOD & in the HOLY & AWESOME ALMIGHTY POWER OF THE FOREVER LIVING GOD on earth!! Please Repent & Come Back To GOD On Earth Now!

   LORD JESUS CHRIST & THE MOTHER OF GOD VIRGIN MARY have been speaking to many, many people TO GIVE GREAT WARNINGS OF GOD to people on earth in personal visions and visits to try to WAKE UP PEOPLE & TO WARN SINNERS TO STOP SINNING AGAINST GOD ON EARTH & TO WARN SINNERS ON EARTH TO REPENT OF SINS AGAINST GOD ON EARTH & TO GET CLOSE TO GOD’S FOREVER LIVING POWER, LOVE, MERCIES, & GRACES ON EARTH NOW.

   ALL AMERICAN CITIZENS and ALL PEOPLE WAKE UP!! Read & Review the WARNINGS OF GOD here:

   (1) Guadalupe, Mexico
   (2) Lourdes, France
   (3) Fatima, Portugal
   (4) La Salette, France
   (5) Pontmain, France
   (6) Beauring, Belgium
   (7) Garabandal, Spain
   (8) Bayside, NY, USA
   (9) Banneux, Belgium
   (10) Akita, Japan
   (11) 1981 to 1989, KIBEHO, RWANDA, AFRICA
   (12) Lagos, Nigeria – http://www.themaninthesynagogue.org/
   And other locations, too.

   There has been in the past, and there is today many places on earth where LORD JESUS CHRIST – Y’SHUA is giving Warnings of the FOREVER LIVING CREATOR – ALMIGHTY GOD – THE MOST HOLY TRINITY to earth for sinful humanity to WAKE UP & STOP SINNING AGAINST GOD, as GOD is already very much too much offended with humanity’s sins against GOD & humanity & animals!

   Here are more: http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=62393

   # # # #

8. Constitutionalist
   December 23rd, 2010 @ 2:00 am

   A long but clearly-written legal essay by Daniel P. Tokaji in the Michigan Law Review explains that the only place to challenge presidential eligibility is in state court (not starting out in federal court, and certainly not in a military court).

   Here’s how to get to a forum post that summarizes the essay (see (1) and (2) below):

   ‘The Presidential Poser’
   [https://news.personalliberty.com/pub/cc?_ri_=X0Gzc2X%3DUQpglLjHJlTQueQcjP4QiMdtQpDzgQ40ihzcQGQaQ9edVXtpKX%3DSRCBBCTY&_ei_=]

   Do a Find for the following strings without the quote marks (as of December 2010 they are near the end; a Find on ‘Obama sultana’ in that same forum will yield additional interesting material):

   (1) ‘September 10, 2010 at 5:00 am’
   (2) ‘September 17, 2010 at 1:57 am’

   Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin initially requested that the Army show him clear proof of Obama’s presidential legitimacy. (A) They said no. (B) The glaring omission from the Army at that time (a sort of ‘crime of omission,’ but not illegal) was a lack of advice to Lakin on how he could achieve his goal.

   Dr. Lakin’s reactions without this information were predictable. Living in a military universe, he tried the obvious next solution within the military: getting himself into a courts-martial trial to try to legally force the evidence out of hiding through ‘discovery.’

   He refused to deploy to Afghanistan and wound up before Army Judge Col. Denise R. Lind. (A) She said it wasn’t relevant for the military to consider such claims as his. In essence, her answer was, ‘No, you can’t go down the path you are on to get the information you want.’ (B) What she didn’t do was tell him who is in fact authorized to entertain challenges to presidential eligibility (shades of another ‘crime of omission,’ though not illegal). (C) The answer no one would give him was ‘the state court system,’ where presidential candidates’ names are placed on state ballots and where election results are challenged.

   Whether it was intentional or whether the Army was just trying not to illegally practice law by giving legal advice (lawyers, like doctors, draw strict boundaries around their territory), a certain amount of unrest within the military (and perhaps within the general population as well) was fomented by its tight-lipped responses.

   Lakin and his supporters were left hanging, thinking he was being martyred.

   It doesn’t make sense that it isn’t relevant for the military to challenge the eligibility of the very Commander-in-Chief of the military, but that’s the strange truth of the matter, because the People (through the political process of voting) have power over the Commander-in-Chief, who is in turn over the military.

   The military court refused to order Obama’s documents to be produced because they couldn’t. To do so was not in their jurisdiction. Lakin was court-martialed, in effect, because he didn’t start a lawsuit in a state court of law instead of through the military. His misstep was born of procedural unawareness, a position he shared with most Americans.

   His was a curious case, where punishment was meted out only according to his actions (not mitigated by his motives), after a cloud of intentionally perpetrated ignorance (from the general culture, the media, his Army superiors and his lawyers) impelled this man to the actions that were subsequently punished.

   Foster ignorance. Watch results. Punish actions.

   The cruel irony is that Lakin was imprisoned for trying to make sure that both he and his Commander-in-Chief were defending and upholding the Constitution as they had sworn to do. His motive was pure. His goal was truth. His crime was one of omission (punishable by the rules of the military), not of commission.

   Meanwhile, federal court cases challenging Obama’s eligibility to be President are all non-judiciable because of the Constitutional requirements for legal standing and because presidential eligibility is a ‘political question’ to be handled at the level of the states’ responsibility for the ballot box where the voice of the People rules. (See the laws put into place by Arizona and other states to enforce proper scrutiny of the eligibility of presidential candidates before the 2012 election.)

   How and when did Lakin finally learn the correct place to address his concern? Why wasn’t he told up front, before he injured himself? Other people, including Christopher Earl Strunk, have brought state court law suits against Obama. Why not point Lakin in that same direction? Was the military trying to avoid the appearance of a shaky U.S. regime in a world where the U.S. is already seriously wounded? Or was it discouraging a stampede into the already-overburdened state court systems? Could Obama’s eligibility status be considered top-secret classified intelligence that no one is permitted to reveal? If so, why?

   It’s hard to believe Lakin wasn’t told where to go. If he wasn’t told, then somebody maliciously sacrificed him. Did he innocently step into a trap? If he was told to go to a state court, then he voluntarily engaged in this courts-martial adventure while knowing that it was an exercise in futility. What precedent would be established by his doing that — the dismissal of a laudable motive as a mitigating factor in cases of disobeying orders or rules?

   No one kept him from being needlessly hung in the public square. Therefore the ones who are guilty deep down are all who knew but didn’t tell. Not Lakin.

   ‘DON’T ASK for evidence, ‘cause we DON’T TELL you how to get it.’

   Can you jail the Army? Pardon Lakin, jail the lawyers.

9. Phil
   December 23rd, 2010 @ 3:13 am

   Michael:…yes…I understand. But how do we go about making the judiciary “do their job(s)?” I understand the Constitution is the Law…but look what they’re doing to the Constitution? And these “moles” are hole up in the Pentagon!

   Also, with trying to rid Congress of the treaon, there isn’t another election, till Nov. 2012! But what vehicle would be used to initiate this “cleansing”? Give a few more statements. Are you discussing signing a directive, to send to the Congress? And who would be the “agent” to “force” these people to do their jobs “or else”?

   Maybe give the New House time to get organized and to start to “dismantle” the “garbage” that was passed? But…I could not do the website thing! I don’t know anything about that. Don’t have the money to support that, and so forth!

   Also, discuss this with Orly? one or more military clients of hers? or one or more of the (Ret) Generals? I already discussed info with Orly early last year, which was a possibility? So who knows…? Let’s get more posters on this…more discussion!

   Davey Crockett…

10. Michael
    December 23rd, 2010 @ 9:18 pm

    Phil,

    What I am saying,is we should send signed directives to all of our public officials.

    Placing them on notice, that we the people will no longer allow them to violate their oath and our Constitution without paying a price. Such as loss of job,retirement and health benefits and even jail time in many cases.

    Explain to them that they no longer have authority to act per AMENDMENT XIV. Section 3. of the U.S. Constitution.

    Which in essence says, anyone who previously takes an oath to support the Constitution and then engages in insurrection or rebellion it, is no longer illegible to hold any office, civil or military, under the United States or under any State.

    “…And who would be the “agent” to “force” these people to do their jobs “or else”? …”

    We the people are the “Sovereigns” not the “subjects” we are there bosses, but, we have been acting like subjects. They work for us,not the other way around.

    We the people can form Citizen Grand Juries, per AMENDMENT V. and hand down presentments or indictments, as need be. The “Citizen Grand Jury” is a powerful tool, yet, a widely misunderstood and unused method of correcting abusive officials. It actually is a fourth branch of government, totally independent of the others.

    We really need to have a public forum to talk and brain storm ideas. If not now, when?
    After we have been completely enslaved?

Leave a Reply