Obama regime pet Col Sullivan defends jihadists and attacks american hero LTC Lakin
Posted on | December 4, 2010 | 6 Comments
ObamaRelease YourRecords on 6:10 PM
This explains why the obots hold up Col. Sullivan on a pedestal and it also explains why the Col. spends a lot of time on his blog bashing and ridiculing Lt. Col. Lakin’s efforts to seek proof that Obama is eligible to be Commander-in-Chief, thus that LTC Lakin’s deployment order issued by Obama is legal. As many know LTC Lakin took an oath to support and defend the Constitution from enemies foreign and domestic. It is important to note that an enlisted soldiers oath is different than the commissioned officers oath. Officers in the Armed Forces of the United States are bound by their oath to disobey any order that may violate the Constitution of the United States.
Now on to Col. Sullivan; if you were to read Col. Sullivan’s about page on his blog you would think he’s a pretty fair and decent person:
“My CAAFlog entries are written purely in my personal capacity. For information purposes only, in my day job I’m a civilian appellate defense counsel in the Air Force Appellate Defense Division. I’m also a judge advocate in the Marine Corps Reserve, currently supporting Marine Corps defense counsel. I’m also an adjunct faculty member at the George Washington University Law School.”
Now, if you were to dig a little deeper(no pun intended) you will find out that Col. Sullivan was the managing attorney of the ACLU’s Baltimore office from 1997 to 2003.
Sullivan was also the chief defense counsel for the Gitmo Jihadists. Yes, he was the chief defender of the 7th Century Throwbacks that would cut off his head quicker than he can publish a hit-piece on LTC Lakin. I find it a bit hypocritical that Col. Sullivan spent a lot time crying about how the Jihadists were not getting fair trials under the military tribunals and now spends some of his time championing the fact that LTC Lakin himself is not getting a fair trial in his court-martial. Nevermind that under U.S.C. Rule 46, a defendant put on court-martial has the right to call any and all witnesses and obtain any evidence in his defense.
According to the USA Today, this is the ilk that Col. Sullivan was sworn to defend; “In a one-year span, Guantanamo Bay detainees made 726 threats, engaged in 227 physical assaults and there were 422 incidents of detainees throwing bodily fluids at guards, said Rear Adm. Harry Harris Jr., commander of the Joint Task Force-Guantanamo.”
I’m guessing if LTC Lakin was a sodomizing, poop throwing, God-hating Jihadist, Col. Sullivan would be singing a different tune!? Instead he is going after a person who is trying to live up to his oath to defend the Constitution.
Bonus; The audio below is Col. Sullivan speaking with Amnesty International, praising them and talking about the Jihadists not getting fair trials.
Sources for the info above can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.
Support LTC Terry Lakin Day: Offices of John McCain, Jon Kyl, Trent Frank; Now is the time to stand up for LTC Lakin and demand action! Details at Source.
Previous reports on LTC Lakin can be searched here. Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama’s eligibility; [https://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].
Comments
6 Responses to “Obama regime pet Col Sullivan defends jihadists and attacks american hero LTC Lakin”
Leave a Reply














29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

December 4th, 2010 @ 8:33 am
Orly, you are a proud member of the CA Bar. Don’t you believe everyone is entitled to competent and vigorous legal representation? Didn’t you contact Amnesty International over your horrible sanctions?
I am a HUGE fan of yours. I read your blog nearly every day! I am just surprised that you would object to people having competent counsel, given your own dedication to justice.
God Bless!
December 4th, 2010 @ 8:35 am
Exposed: Now we know why the anti-American obots love Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin Basher, Colonel Dwight Sullivan of CAAFLOG…
https://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/12/now-we-know-why-anti-american-obots.html#comment-form
https://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/12/now-we-know-why-anti-american-obots.html#comment-form
See
https://www.caaflog.com/2010/11/28/this-week-in-military-justice-28-november-2010-edition/#comments
https://www.caaflog.com/2010/11/28/this-week-in-military-justice-28-november-2010-edition/#comments
Mario Apuzzo won the debate, Sullivan gave up. Messages backing Apuzzo most of the time
are not aproved.
The way Sullivan speaks about court cases about the usurper, make anyone think he is advising
on his web to someone could it be the courts, congress or the media. The time spent also at other sites on the same issue by his followers like NBC from https://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/
https://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/
or SueDB sounds like they have a job to do in their well trained assignment.
December 4th, 2010 @ 9:59 am
So Chuckie Kerchner opposes fair trials for all persons notwithstanding the guarantees of our Constitution? Perhaps he missed the part where the Supreme Court AGREED with the arguments of counsel for the Guantanamo detainees that the military commission system violated the Constitution and the Geneva Conventions.
December 4th, 2010 @ 5:19 pm
> under U.S.C. Rule 46, a defendant put on court-martial has the right to call any and all witnesses and obtain any evidence in his defense
Come again? What Rule 46 are you talking about? The only sites mentioning a “U.S.C. Rule 46” are birther sites reporting on the Lakin case.
Can you, as a lawyer, not even give a correct identification of the law you are talking about?
December 4th, 2010 @ 7:47 pm
Excellent point, Andi. There is no “U.S.C. Rule 46.” There is, however, the UCMJ art. 46, which provides for compulsory process of witnesses. Nothing in Judge Lind’s ruling denies LTC Lakin his right to compulsory process — in accordance with regulations prescribed for implementing Article 46. Notably, Lakin has DROPPED HIS APPEAL relating to Article 46, so one has to wonder why Chuckie Kerchner is all up in arms about it.